Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (Tneb), Chennai Vs. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited, and Another

Decided On : Jan-05-2011

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: Section 111 of the Electricity Act, the Appeal No.132/2010, The Tariff Regulations 2001, Section 65, the Indian Contract Act, Section 65 of the Contract Act, Section 5, Section 5, the Limitation Act, the Appeal No, the Appeal No., the Appeal No., the Review Applications before

ORG: Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited(NIL, Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, Central Commission, The Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Appeals Nos.132/2010, the Central Commission, Appellant, Appeals, Appeals, Appellant, Appeal, the Central Commission, Appellant, Appeal, the Central Commission, Appeals, The Neyveli Lignite Corporation Limited, Applications, Applications, Applications, The Appellant Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, NLC, Letter of Credit, Letter of Credit, the Letter of Credit, Appellant, the Central Commission in Petition No.97, NLC, the Central Commission, No.97, Appellant, Electricity Board, the Letter of Credit, the Appellate Forum, the Electricity Board, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, No.17 of 2006, the Central Commission, Appellant, the Central Commission, Rs.79.52, the Central Commission, Rs.79.52, Tribunal, the Central Commission, Tribunal, the Review Petitions, the Central Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appeal No.78/2009, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, NLC, Bench, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, NLC, the Review Petitions, the Central Commission, The Central Commission, Review Petitions, the Review Petition, Appellant, the Central Commission, Appeals, Impugned Orders, Appellants, Appeal, Appeal, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, Appeals, the Petition No.97, No.17 of 2006, the Central Commission, the Respondent NLC, Appellant, the Central Commission Regulations, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, NLC, NLC, NLC, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Central Commission, Tribunal, Order, the Central Commission, NLC, Tribunal, the Central Commission, Appeals, Tribunal, No.79 of 2009, Appellants, Appeals, the Central Commission, Review Petition, Tribunal, Appeals, Appellant, the Central Commission, NLC, the Central Commission, Review Petitions, the Review Petition, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Learned Counsel, the Planning Department of the Appellant, The Planning Department, the Department of Finance, NLC, the Department of Finance, Electricity Board, the Department of Finance, the Electricity Board, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Petition No.163/2009, Appeals, Appellant, Tribunal, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Review Petitions, Review Petition the Appellant, Appeal, Tribunal, Appellants, Appeals, Appellant, Tribunal, the Central Commission, the Respondent NLC, the Central Commission, NLC, NLC, NLC, NLC, Electricity Board, NLC, NLC, Appellant, Appellant, NLC, NLC, TNEB, NLC, Bulk Power Supply Agreement, the Bulk Power Supply Agreement, Agreement, Regulations, the Central Commission, NLC, the Central Commission, Bulk Power Supply Agreement, Regulations, Agreement, Counsel for the Appellant, Corporation Bank, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs, Bombay Towers International Ltd, 9 SCC 274 &, Shiv Das Vs, UOI, District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd., the Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Appeals, Appeals, Tribunal, Review Petition Nos.98, the Central Commission, the Review Petition, the Review Petition, these Appeals Nos.132, Appeals, the Central Commission, Tribunal, Appeals, CTC 663 &#8211, ELR, APTEL) 0232 &, M.D. Bescom Vs, ELR, APTEL, Konkan Synthetic Fibres, Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, ELR, APTEL) 0234 &, Mula Parvara Electricity Coop, Society Vs, Maharashtra ERC, ELR, APTEL, Shrishrimal Plantation Ltd., Chhattisgarh State Power Distribution Co. Ltd., ELR, APTEL, Maharashtra Jeevan, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Co. Ltd., Central Power Distribution Company, AIR 1964, SC 743 &#, Central Bank of India Vs, ELR, APTEL, BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd 11, Appeals, the Central Commission, Supreme Court, District Cooperative Central Bank Ltd. Jagdalpur, Suit, the Hon’ble Supreme Count, the Hon’ble, Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Hon’ble, Supreme Court, CTC 663, Supreme Court, the Hon’ble, Supreme Court, Appeal, Appeal, Court, The Rules of Limitation, AIR 1962, SC 361 &#, Rewa Coalfields Ltd, Supreme Court, Appeal, Court, Court, Limitation, Supreme Court, The Hon’ble Supreme Court, discretion.&#8221, ELR, APTEL, Synthetic Fibres, Yarn Unit, Century Enka Ltd, Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, issue.&#8221, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, State, Affidavit, Union of India, the Union of India, the Hon’ble, Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, Tribunal, Appeals, IA 182 of, Appellant, Appeals, Tribunal, Appellant, the Review Petition No.98/2009, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Review Petition, Appellant, Review Application Nos.98, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Tribunal, the Respondent NLC, the Central Commission, Appellant, the Central Commission, BSP Agreement, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Appellant, the Central Commission, Tribunal, the Central Commission, NLC, Appeals, Impugned Orders, Appellant, the Central Commission for Review, Appellant, the Central Commission, Tribunal, the Central Commission, Tribunal, Appeals, the Ist Impugned Order, Appellant, Central Commission, the Review Petition, Tribunal, Review Petition, the Central Commission, Appellant, Appeals, the Central Commission, Appeals, Review Application, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Appeals, Appellant, Appeals, the Central Commission, Review, the Review Petitions, the Central Commission, Appeals, Review Petition, the Central Commission, Review Petition, Tribunal, Appeals, Letter of Credit, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Respondent NLC, Letter of Credit, Tribunal, Appeals, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Appeals, the Central Commission, the Planning Department of the Appellant, the Accounts Department of the Electricity Board, the Planning Department of the Electricity Board, the Central Commission, the Planning Department, the Accounts Department, the Accounts Department, the Planning Department, the Accounts Department of the Electricity Board, the Planning Department, Affidavit, the Planning Department of TNEB, the Accounts Department of TNEB, the Planning Department, TNEB, Commission, Appellant, NLC, Finance Department, Petition No.163/2008.&#8221, Appellant, Planning Department, the Accounts Department, TNEB, Finance Department, Planning Department, Accounts Department, the Finance Department, the Appellant Electricity Board, Departments, Department, Department, the Planning Department, the Accounts Department, the Planning Department, the Accounts Department, Departments, Affidavit, the Planning Department, the Accounts Department, Affidavit, Affidavit, Appellant, Appeal, the Central Commission, Appellant, Appeal, Appellant, Appeals, Impugned Order, Appellant, Appeal, the Letter of Credit, the Review Petition, Tribunal, Appeals, the Review Petition, Appeal, Appellant, Tribunal, the Central Commission, Tribunal, the Central Commission, issue.&#8221, Counsel for the Appellant, the Respondent, Written Submission, the Appellant Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Appellant, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, Appeals, Appellant, the Central Commission, Appeals

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, the Common Order, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

ORDINAL: first, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 1st, 3rd, first, 30th, 1st, 1st, 3rd, 3rd, first, 1st, 1st, 1st, first, 2nd, first, 3rd, 1st, 3rd, first, 3rd, first, 2nd, 2nd, first, first, first, first, 2nd, 2nd, first

CARDINAL: 2, two, two, two, 4, 5, two, 6, two, two, 7, 5.6.2003, 10, 1.4.2004, 9.8.2005, 1.4.2001, 31.12.2007, 23.12.2008, two, 80, 80, two, 7.2.2010, 133, two, 8, two, 9, two, 19.10.2005, 134, two, 23.12.2008, 19.10.2005, 31.12.2007, 23.12.2008, 23.12.2008, one, 80, 19.5.2009, 99/1999, 3, 5.6.2003, 14.5.2006, 10, 4.5.2010, 133/2010. 11, 3, 5.6.2003, three, 2.3.2009, 3, 5.6.2003, 50, two, 12, two, 1.4.2001, 31.3.2004, 5.6.2003, 9.3.2001, 1.4.2002 to 31.3.2004, 13, 2, 2, 4, 10, 14, 6, 1, 7, 3, 3, 26.4.2009, 26.4.2009, 2nd, 19.5.2009, 17.12.2009, 99, two, 80, 133, 5.6.2003, three, 2, 15, 1, 5, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8), 2, 10, 2, 16, 17, 14, 18, 5, 1, 7, time.&#8221, 19, two, 20, 2, 21, 3, 22, 23, 2, 24, 2, 25, 1, 2, 3, 4, two, 5, 6, 26, 27, 132, 133, 14.09.2006, 28, 19.5.2005, 14.09.2006, 29, 3, 19.10.2005, 26.4.2009, 30, 26.4.2009, two, 99/2009, 19.5.2009, 31, 133, 99, 33, 19.10.2005, 17.1.2005, 21.2.2005, 2.5.2005, 1.4.2004, 19.5.2005, 37, 3, 5.6.2003, 22.12.2003, 31.03.2009, 39, three, 31.03.2005, 3, 80, 80, 41, two, 19.05.2005, 26.4.2009, 80, 26.4.2009, 43, 19.5.2009, 3, 3, two, 26.4.2009, 19.5.2009, 47, 80, 133, 3, 5.6.2003, 163, two, 50, 51, 5.6.2003, 52, 5.6.2003, 22.12.2003, 53, 15, two, 55, one, 57, 3, 5.6.2003, 3, 3, 23.9.2005, 59, 3, 14.09.2006, 60, 19.10.2005, 61, 17.1.2005, 21.2.2005, 2.5.2005, 19.10.2005, 62, 133, 64, 1.4.2010, 66, 67, 29.9.2010, 68, 69

DATE: 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 19.10.2005 and 14.9.2006, 45 days, 2003, 4 or 5 years 3, 1668 days, 2010, 1668 days, 19.10.2005, 1338 days, 2010, 1338 days, 14.9.2006, three working days, one month, 1.10.2001, monthly, January, 2004, 26.10.2004, 2005, 19.10.2005, 2005, 2001, 19.10.2005, 17.3.2006, 2006, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 19.10.2005, 31.12.2007, 2008, 31.12.2007, 31.3.2009, 31.3.2009, 2009, 19.10.2005, 14.09.2006, 2009, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 2009, 2009, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 20.5.2009, 2009, 31.3.2009, 20.5.2009, 80 of 2009, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 17.12.2009, 2010, 2010, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 1668 days, 19.10.2005, 1338 days, 14.9.2006, 2010, 2010, 2010, 1668 days, 1338 days, 2005, 14.9.2006, 2010, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, the order 1st, a period of, one month, 2006, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 2008, 2008, 31.3.2009, 79, 80 of 2009, 31.3.2009, 14.9.2006, 19.10.2005, 2009, 31.3.2009, 31.3.2009, 2009, May, 2009, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 6.5.2009, 22.12.2003, 26.10.2004, 19.10.2005, 17.12.2009, 25.1.2010, 22.12.2003, 26.10.2004, Appellant’s, 31.3.2009, 79, 80 of 2009, 31.3.2009, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 80/2009, 22.12.2003, 26.10.2004, 19.10.2005, 17/2006, 1.4.2001 to 31.12.2007, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 17/2006, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 1.4.2001, 3 years, August, 2005, 17/2006, 22.12.2003, 3 working days, 3 working days, 27 days, 3 working days, 27 days, 2001, 18.2.1999, 3 working days, 2004, 2004, 1998, 3) 2007, 4) 2007, 2008, 6) 2009, 7) 1994, 2006, 1998, 14, 80 of 2009, 2009, 17.12.2009, 2009, April, 2009, 17.12.2009, 5 months, 26.10.2004, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 1872, 2008, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 2010, 7) 2007, 1985, 2010, 2008, 1668 days, 2010, 19.10.2005, 1338 days, 2010, 14.9.2006, 2008, 2008, 1981, the last day, 1998, 1973, 2005, 2010, 1992, 1994, 2010, 19.10.2005, 2010, 1668 days, 1338 days, 2010, 2010, 14.05.2010, 19.10.2005, the 2nd, 14.9.2006, 6.5.2009, 17.12.2009, 2010, 32, 1999, 17.12.2009, 34, 7.1.2005, 19.10.2005, 1.3.2006, April, 2004, 35, 19.10.2005, 19.10.2005, 19.10.2005, 2nd 36, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 19.10.2005, 1.3.2006, 31.12.2009, 38, 26.10.2004, 19.05.2006, 14.09.2006, 79, 2009, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 6.5.2009, 40, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 19.10.2005, 42, 2009, 14.9.2006, 6.5.2009, the period between 19.5.2005/14.9.2006 and 6.5.2009, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 19.10.2005 and 14.9.2006, 44, March, 2009, 19.10.2005, March, 2009, 45, the 1st, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 46, 19.10.2005/14.09.2006, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 2009, 17.12.2009, 17.12.2009, 2010, 1668 days, 1338 days, 48, 22.12.2003, 26.10.2004, 19.10.2005, 14.9.2006, 2008, 49, 17/2006, 22.12.2003, 1669 days, 26.10.2004, 54, 22.10.2010, 56, 22.12.2003, 26.10.2004, 2.3.2009, 2003, 2004, March, 2009, March, 2009, 58, 21.4.2006, March, 2009, 19.10.2005, 2006, 14.9.2006, 7.1.2005, 2.3.2009, 12.3.2009, 80 of 1990, 63, 17.12.2009, 2010, 17.12.2009, 2001, 30th November, 2007, 31.12.2007, 1668 days, 1338 days, 70, 1668 days, 19.10.2005, 1338 days, 14.9.2006

GPE: I.A., I.A., IA, I.A., No.97/2005, Kerala, Singh, Singh, IA, I.A., Affidavit, Affidavit

PERSON: Order, Neyveli, No.163, Order, 24.5.2010, Appeal, Order, Appellant, Anr, Nabim Shah (, Amrendra, Manohar Lal Vs, SP Jung Vs, Jagamath, Hamja Haji Vs, Tarsem Singh Vs, Sukhminder Singh, Pundlik Jalam Patil, Jalgaon Medium Project 2, SBI, K. Ramanathan Vs, Ajay Mohan Vs, H.N. Rai, Manohar Lal Verma Vs, Pundlik Jalam Patil, manner.&#8221, cause.&#8221, Balakrishnan Vs, 8220;Ram Lal, 8220;Rajender Singh, Shanta Singh, Lipok AO, Anr, Raj Kumar&#8221, cause.&#8221, Supp, Vidarbha Venaer, Impugned Order, Impugned Order, Admittedly, Appeal Nos.132, Impugned Order, Ist, Appellant, Appellant, Appeal NO.50/2010, Order, 24.5.2010, Appeal, Appeal Nos.132, Appellant, Impugned Order, Appeal Nos.132, Order

FAC: Tamil Nadu, the Appellant/Applicant, Appellant, Appellant, Petition No.97/2005

PERCENT: 2.5%, 1%, 1%, 1%, 2%, 1%, only 1%, 2.5%/2.25%/2%, 2.5%/2.25%/2%, only 1%, 2.5%

WORK_OF_ART: Appellant, Orders, Law of Limitation, Review before the Central Commission, Review before the Central Commission

LOC: Respondent, the Petition No.163 of 2008, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Petition No.97/2005, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Damodar Valley, Courts, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Petition No.97/2005, Petition No.97/2005, Petition No.97/2005

MONEY: 628 &#, 100 &#8211, 296 &#, 445 &#, 235 &#, 1 &#, 8211, 416 &#, 471 &#, 8211, 8212, 8211, 8211, 8211, 116 &#, 8211, 8220;Whether, 445 &#, 8220;Now, 8220;The, 495 &#, 8220;It, 123 &#, 8220;It, 8212, 705 &#8211, 8220;The, 752 &#, 8220;Proof, 216 &#8211, 128 &#8211, 8220;In, 696 &#, 8220;The, 8220;It, 8220;The, 8220;We