Lanco Amarkantak Power Pvt. Ltd. Hyderabad Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission Bhopal and Others

Decided On : Aug-06-2009

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: a Power Sale Agreement, Article 3.1.3 of the PPA, Article 3.1.3, the Electricity Act, Section 64(5, Section 64(5, Section 2(39, Section 14, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 86 of the Act now &, Section 86(1)(f, Section 86(1)(f, Section 158 of the Act, section 86, Section 158 of the Central Act and Regulations, Article 1.1 of the PPA, Section 86(1)(f, the Power Sale Agreement, Section 64(5, Section 86(1)(a, Section 2(39, Section 14 of the Act, Section 86(1)(f, Section 86, Section 86(1)(f

PERSON: M. Karpaga Vinayagam, Lanco Amarkantak Power Pvt, Lanco Amarkantak Power Pvt, Shanti Bhushan, Order, Vikas Singh, MG Ramachandran, Vikas Singh, MG Ramachandran, Vikas Singh, Commission.&#8221, Commission.&#8221, inter se, Order, Order

LOC: the Appellant herein, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, the R-2 and R-3, R-2, R-2, R-2

ORG: the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, Appellant, PTC India Ltd., the Central Commission, PTC India Ltd., the Appellant in Chhattisgarh, the Appropriate Commission, MP Power Trading Co. Ltd., the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, PSA, The State Commission, Commission, R-3, the High Court of, Appellant, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, R-3, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appeal, Tribunal, Order, Appellant, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, PTC India Ltd., R-2, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the State Commission, Appellant, Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, Commission, the Learned Senior Counsel, The Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the State of Chhattisgarh, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Chhattisgarh State Commission, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Chhattisgarh State Commission, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Learned Senior Counsel, the Learned Counsel, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the State Commission, the Appellant in Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, the Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, Madhya Pradesh, Order, the Learned Senior Counsel, the Central Commission, the Madhya Pradesh Regulations, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd., Essar Power Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Appropriate Commission, the Learned Counsel for R-3, the Learned Senior Counsel, Regulations and Sections, Commission, the Appellant in Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, Madhya Pradesh, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, Clauses of the Regulations, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, Madhya Pradesh State Commission, Act, the State Commission, Functions of State Commission, State Commission, (d) &, the State Commission, the Regulatory Commission, State, State Commission, the State Commission, Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Central Commission, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, The Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, Commission, CERRC (Central Commission, State, Clauses 10.2, Regulations, State, Madhya Pradesh, the State of Chhattisgarh, the State of Chhattisgarh, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Central Commission, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, The Learned Senior Counsel, Supreme Court, the State Commission, The Hon’ble Supreme Court, High Court, Commission, Supreme Court, the State Commission, the Central Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Learned Counsel, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Learned Senior Counsel, PSA, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, Madhya Pradesh, Respondents, Appellant, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the Learned Senior Counsel, Commission, Tribunal, The Learned Counsel, Respondents, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, PSA, Commission, Tribunal, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, PSA, Commission, the Tribunal on 21.10.2008, State Commission, the words &, every State Commission, every State Commission, the Learned Counsel, Clauses of Regulations, the Central Commission, State Commission, the Learned Counsel, Respondents, the Central Commission, the State Regulatory Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Regulatory Commission, Legislature, the Madhya Pradesh State Commission, Commission, the Central Commission, Commission, the Learned Senior Counsel, Madhya Pradesh State Commission, the Chhattisgarh Commission, the Learned Senior Counsel, Commission, Commission, Appeal

CARDINAL: 2, 3, 4, 5, 16.11.2005, 6.5.2008, 6, 21.10.2008, 7, 8, 9, two, 10, three, 21.12.2005, 4, 755, 11, 12, 13, 1, 15, 16, 1, 17, 18, 19, 20, 4, 755, 21, two, two, two, one, 22, 23, 25, 21.10.2008, 26, 6.5.2008, 6.5.2008, 21.10.2008, 27, 6.5.2008, 6.5.2008, 28, 29, 30, 2, 21.12.2005, two, 31, 33, 34

GPE: Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, New Delhi, Madhya Pradesh, India, India, Madhya Pradesh

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Rule 9 of the Electricity Rules, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

FAC: R-2, R-2, R-2, the R-2 (PTC, R-2, R-2

DATE: 11.5.2005, 14.3.2008, 14.3.2008, 2003, 2003, 2005, 2008, 2003, 14, 2004, 2008, 24, 32

MONEY: 8220;86, 8230;&#8230, 8230;&#8230, 8230;&#8230, 8230;&#8230, 8230;&#8230, 8220;a, 8220;licensee&#8221

ORDINAL: third