Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

In the Matter of Punjab State Electricity Board, (Punjab) Vs. Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Chandigarh

Decided On : Mar-04-2011

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: the Electricity Act, Central Commission’s Regulations, the Regulation 22

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 4, 14.6.2005, 5., 21.11.2005, 6, 1.4.2007 to 31.3.2008, 7, 8, two, 210, 9, 116, 22.17, 62, 22.17, 54, 10, 11, 12, 2666.67, two, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 62, 116, 22, 116, 62, 23, 24, 22, 25, 2666.67, 2, 6, 26, 2500, two, 3000, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 931, 33, 34, 37, 38, 62, as high as, 39

ORG: State Electricity Board, The Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Appellant, Appeal, the State Commission, State Electricity Board, the State of Punjab, Sec, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Determination of Tariff ) Regulations, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, The Learned Counsel, MW, Plant Load Factor/Availability, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, The Learned Counsel, Appellant, the State Commission, the Net Calorific Value, the State Commission, Gross Calorific Value, Gross Calorific Value, The State Commission, Net Calorific Value to Gross Calorific Value, the Central Commission, State Heat Rate, the State Commission, Guru Govind Singh Super Thermal Power Station (GGSSTP, the State Commission, the Central Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, The State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, Plant Load Factor/ Availability, the State Commission, Plant Load Factor/Availability, Plant Load Factor/Availability, the Central Regulation, the State Commission, the Learned Counsel, the State Commission, the Learned Counsel, the State Commission, the State Commission, MU, Appellant, the State Commission, the Net Calorific Value to Gross Calorific Value, State, the Learned Counsel, the Central Commission Regulations, the Gross Calorific Value, the Net Calorific Value, NCV, the State Commission, the Central Commission Regulations, The State Commission, Coal &#, the Central Commission, the State Commission, the Central Commission, the State Commission, Central Commission, GGSTPS, the Central Commission, GNDTP, the State Commission, Tanda Thermal Station of NTPC, the State Commission, the Central Commission, Tanda, Transmission and Distribution Losses, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, State Commission, the State Commission, Employees Cost, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Commission, the State Commission, Board, Tribunal, Tribunal, APTEL, State Electricity Commission, State Commission, the Target Plant Load Factor/ Availability Factor, Appellant, the State Commission, PLF, the State Commission, the Plant Load Factor, Plant Load Factor, Appellant, the State Commission, Plant Load Factor, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, MU, the State Commission, Calorific Value to Gross Calorific Value, the State Commission, the Central Commission, Commission, the Gross Calorific Value of, the Net Calorific Value, The State Commission, the Central Commission, Regulations, The State Commission, the Station Heat Rate, the Central Commission, the State Commission, Central Commission, the Central Commission, GNDTP, the State Commission, Tanda Thermal Station of NTPC, Transmission and Distribution Losses, the Station Commission, the State Commission, Board, Board, the State Commission, The State Commission, Tribunal, The State Commission, Board, Tribunal, Tribunal, the State Commission, Plant Load Factor/Target Availability, the State Commission, the Plant Load Factor, Plant Load Factor, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appeal

LOC: the Appellant herein, Central Commission’s

DATE: 17.9.2007, Annual, 2007-08, 2006-2007, 2003, 2005-2006, 10.5.2006, 2006-2007, 2005, 2007-2008, 30.11.2006, the previous year 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007-2008, the tariff year 2007-2008, 17.9.2007, the year 2007-2008, the previous years 2005-06, 2006-2007, 17.9.2007, 2005-2006, 2005-06, FY 2005-06, 2006-2007, 2006-2007, 2007-08, more than 22 years old, 2007-08, the years, the year 2005-2006, 2006-2007, 2007-08, 2007-08, the year 2007-08, the year 2001-02, the next six years, the year 2007-08, the year 2006-07, the year, 2007, the year 2007-08, 32, 35, 36, 2005-06, the year 2001-02, the next six years, the year 2007-08, the year, the year 2007-08, 2005-06

EVENT: the Financial Year, the Financial Year, the Financial Year, Financial Year 2005-2006, the Financial Year, the Financial Year, Financial Year 2005-2006, the Financial Year

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

FAC: Guru Gobind Singh Super Thermal Power Station

ORDINAL: first, first

PERCENT: 19.5%, 22%, 22%, 19.5%, 22%, 27.52%, 19.5%, 23.91%, 22%, 19.50%, 27.52%, 19.5%, 19.5%

WORK_OF_ART: Appellant for the Financial Year, Regulation

PERSON: Rs.1661.41, Station Heat Rate, Guru Govind Singh, GNDTP, Rs.1661.41, Findings, Gross Heat Rate, Rs.1661.41

MONEY: 8216;as, 8216;as, 8216;as, 8216;as

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //