Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., (Ongc), Ahmedabad Vs. Gujrat Electricity Regulatory Commission, Ahmedabad

Decided On : Mar-08-2011

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: Order No.2 of 2006, the Electricity Act 2003, section 60, Electricity Act 2003, Electricity Act 2003, under Electricity Act 2003, Section 86, section 42, Section 86 of, Order no. 2 of 2006, Order or Regulations, the Electricity Act 2003, the Electricity Act 2003, Order no. 1 of 2010, Electricity Act 2003, Order no 2 of 2006

ORG: V.J. Talwar, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation, ONGC, Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, State Commission, Gujarat Electricity Transmission Corporation, 5th Respondents, Order of State Commission, Captive Wind Energy Generators, ONGC, Appellant, State Commission, State, State Commission, Tariff Order, ONGC, Wind Energy Generators, State, ONGC, R‐2, Wind Energy Generators, Appellant, State Commission, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, 7 Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generator, ONGC, State Government, The State Government, Wind Energy Generator, R‐2, ONGC, ONGC, State Government, ONGC, State Government, R‐2, ONGC, Wind Energy Generators, ONGC, State Commission, State Commission, Tariff Order, ARR, Wind Energy Generators, GECTO, Thereupon State Commission, Order, Order, State Commission, the State Commission, State Government, The State Commission, ONGC, ONGC, ONGC, ONGC, Transmission, Wind Energy Generators, Commission, ONGC, Wind Energy Generators, State Government Wind Power Policy, ONGC, Wind Energy Generators, State Government, State, State Government Wind Power, ONGC, State Commission, State, State Government Wind Power Policy, Wind Energy Generators, State Commission, Order, The State Commission, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, Commission, Commission, State Commission, Order, Wind Energy Generators, ONGC, State Government Policy, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, ONGC, Learned Counsel, Wind Energy Generator, the State Government Wind Power, Wind Energy Generators, State Government Wind Power, State Commission, Order, the State Commission, State Government, the State Commission, State, State Commission, Wind Energy Generators, State Commission, the State Commission, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, Order, Wind Turbine Generators, Order, the State Commission, Appellant, Wind Turbine, Wind Turbine, the State Commission, the Amended Policy of the Government of Gujarat, Wind Energy Generator, ONGC, Wind Energy Generators, ONGC, State Commission, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, State, Wind Power, inter alia, Industrial Undertakings, State, The Wind Power Policy of, the Wind Power Policy, Wind Turbine Generators, State, Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, State Commission, Wind Energy Generator, ONGC, Supreme Court, K C Deo Bhanj v Raghunath Misra, AIR 1959 SC 586, the word “reduce&#8221, the word &#, the word &#, Policy of State Government, Energy, Petrochemical Department, State Government, M/S India Wind Energy Association, Wind Power Policy, Wind Power, State Government, ONGC, the State Government, Wind Energy Generators, ONGC, the State Commission, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, Appellant, Wind Energy Generators, State Commission, ONGC, Gujarat Energy Development Agency, GEDA, GEDA, These Wind Energy Generators, MVA, The Moti Sindholi, GEDA, GEDA, GEDA, M/S Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd &, MW, WTG, MVA, The Moti Sindholi, GEDA, fed, Wind Energy Generators, the Energy Units, Energy, Energy, the Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, Amendment to Government, GEDA, GETCO, the Wind Energy Generators, The State Commission, Wind Energy Generator, ONGC, Wind Energy Generators, GETCO/EE‐C/2108, Government of Gujarat, Order, Government of Gujarat, Appellant, Wind Energy Generators, Government of Gujarat Government Resolution, Power Policy (First Amendment), Wheeling of Electricity, the Wind Turbine Generators, State, Distribution Company, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, State Commission, State Commission, State Government, the State Government, R‐2, Wind Energy Generators, Appellant, GETCO, Wind Energy Generators, State Commission, Commission, Whether State Commission, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, GEDA, Wind Energy Generators, Commission, Wind Energy Generators, Energy, Petrochemical Department, Commission, Wind Power Policy, Appellant, State Commission, GETCO, Wind Energy Generators, the State Commission, Order, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, the State Commission, GETCO, Wind Energy Generators, Commission, Order, the State Commission, Government of Gujarat, GETCO, Government of Gujarat, State Commission, GETCO, potest de injuria sua propria&#8221, inter alia, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Union of India, R‐2, ONGC, Wind Energy, Government of Gujarat, the State Commission, the State Commission, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, Order, the State Commission, Wind Energy Generators, Open Access, State, State, MW, Saurastra, Kutch, The Gujarat Energy Development Agency, the Indian Institute of Meteorology, State, The Government of India, Wind Energy, State Government, the State Government, Sales Tax, the State Such Industrial, State, the Gujrat Electricity Board, Government of Gujarat’s 2002 Policy, State, State Commissions, State Commission, Functions of State Commission, State Commission, State, the State Commission, State Commission, Transmission and Wheeling Charges, basis&#8230, GETCO, State Commission, Wind Power Policy, State, State Commission, State Government, State Commission, Wind Power, Wind Power Policy, State, Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, GERC, State Commission, Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, Government of Gujarat, Wheeling of Electricity, the Wind Turbine Generators, State, Distribution Company, the State Commission, The State Commission, the Gujrat Urja Vikas Nigam, the State Commission, State Commission, Transmission, Commission, GETCO, the Order of the Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Order, Commission, Commission, the Wind Power Policy, Government of Gujarat, Government of Gujarat, State Commission in Government Resolution, Wind Energy Generators, Commission, the State Commission, this Order Commission, Transmission and Wheeling, Transmission and Wheeling charges &#8230, Commission, GETCO, Govt, Gujrat Amended Wind Power Policy, Commission, the Wind Power Generators, State, the Wind Power Generators, State, Access Consumer, the Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generators, Wind Energy Generator, State, State Commission, parties.&#8221, Wind Energy Generators, Energy Generators, State, State, Transmission, I., Wind Energy Generator in Government, Wind Energy Generators, GETCO, Appellant, State Commission, State Commission, State Commission, Policy vide Government Resolution

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Commission’s Order, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Commission’s Order no, Commission’s, Para 9 of the Regulations

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 4, 29.9.2005, 5, 34, Three, 31.3.2008, 27.5.2008, seven, more than two, 6, 954, 31, 3.37, 7, 24, 29.9.2008, 24, 29.9.2008, two, 24, more than two, 8, more than two, 9, 5.3.2009, 12.3.2009, 5.3.2009, 5, 10, 11, 954, 12, 13, 34, 14, 24, 15, 5, 3, 3, 34, 31.3.2008, Seven, 9.9.2008, only 10, 24, 6.5.2008, 24, 16, 5.4, 10, 24, 10, 24, 17, 18, 11.8.2009, 34, 10, 24, 20, 10, 24, 24, 2, more than two, 24, 2, 24, 24, 2, 24, up to two, 34, 24, 22, one, one, 23, 24, two, them&#8221, 8, 2, 3, 5, 25, two, two, 3, 5, more than one, more than two, 26, 27, up to two, two, 28, more than two, more than two, 29, 30, 31, 32, 954, 3, Seven, 33, 24, 29.9.2008, 23.10.2008, 29.9.2008, 33, 300, 34, 36, 24, twenty four, 33, 300, 36, 8, 24, electricity.&#8221, 37, 2, 38, 39, 40, 41, 3.2, 3.6, 5, 3.2, 3.6, 17.03.09, 43, 66, more than two, 5, 45, 3, 31.3.2008, 7, 21.12.2008, 24, more than two, 10.09.2008, 24, 29.9.2008, 5.3.2009, 24, 50, 24, 24, 29.9.2008, 24, 29.9.2008, more than two, 51, 51.1, 954, 2.4, 34, 31.3.2008, 7, 24, 7.7, 10.9.2008, 12.03.2008, 24, 954, 51.2, 1996(4, 127, more than two, 2002&#8230, 3, two, two, 8, 4%.&#8221, 55, 56, 86, 1, 57, 2, 59, 60, 66, more than two, 5, 61, 66, 66, 62, 7.9, 63, policy.&#8221, 6.1, 6.1, 66, 66, 4:6, more than one, one, 4:3.&#8221, 65, 2.2, 66, 67, 6.11.2008, 69, 2011.&#8221

ORDINAL: first, second, 3rd, 4th, 7th, first, First, 6th, 6th, 7th, first, second, First, first, second, 10th, third, 11th, 11th, 11th, 11th

GPE: the State of Gujarat, the State of Gujarat, Gujarat, Gujarat, the State of Gujarat, inter‐alia, G.R., Tribunal, MD, Gujarat, Gujarat, 7/1/2009, IV, Gujarat

DATE: 23.9.2009, 2007, 13.6.2007, 11.8.2006, 2007, 2008, 10.9.2008, 11.8.2006, 20.12.2008 GECTO, 2007, 2007, 2007, 2007, 2007, 2007, 7th January 2009, 07.01.2009, 17.1.2009, ONGC’s, 2008, 6.5.2009, January 2009, 2007, January 2009, 7th January 2009, 2007, 11.8.2006, 2007, 2009, 6.5.2009, 23.9.2009, May 2008, June 2008, that day, 23.9.2009, 2007, 6.5.2009, 18.6.2009, 2007, 6.5.2009, 2007, 23.9.2009, 2007, 2007, 6.5.2009, January 2009, 6.5.2009, 6.5.2009, January, 2009, 6.5.2009, 6.5.2009, 4.3.2009, 12.3.2009, 25.3.2009, 6.5.2009, 2007, 21, 2007, 2007, 2007, 2002, 2007, 2002, 2002, 2007, 2007, 20th June, 2007, 30th June, 2012, a period of twenty years, 2002, 2007, 2002, 2007, 2007, 2002, 2007, 2002, 2007, November 2008, 21st May 2008, 2002, 2007, November 2008, 2007, January 2009, 2007, 2008, 10.9.2008, 23/10/2008, 35, 2007, 12.3.2009, 2007, 2007, 12.3.2009, 2007, 7th January 2009, 42, 2007, 7th January 2009, 7th January 2009, 2007, 44, 2007, 27.05.2008, June 2008, 46, 2007, 2007, 47, 2007, 12.3.2009, 48, 49, 2007, 2007, 2008, 10.9.2008, 6.5.2009, May, 2008, 2008, 2007, 2007, 52, 53, 2007, 54, 2002, year 2003, August 2006, 58, 2002, 2006, 2002, 2007, 13.6.2007, 2007, 2007, January 2009, 2007, 23rd January 2009, 2003, 23.1.2009, 6.5.2009, January 2009.&#8221, 2007, January 2009, 2007, 6.5.2009, 64, 13th January, 2009, 2007, August 2009, 11th August, 2009, 11th August, 2009, 10th August, August 2010, 2007, 2006, August 2009, 2007, 2007, 12.3.2009, 10.8.2006, 2007, 68, today, the 8th March

PERSON: R‐2, GECTO, GECTO, R‐2, Order, R‐2, R‐2, R‐2, R‐2, GECTO, R‐2, R‐2, Order, Order, GECTO, R‐2, Order, GECTO, R‐2, GECTO, R‐2, Order, R‐2, Order, R‐2, R‐2, GECTO, R‐2, GECTO, R‐2, Order, GECTO, R‐2, Order, Order, R‐2, Order, Order, Order, Order, Order, Order, i. Appellant, Stated, Rejoinder, Order, R‐2, GECTO, 8220;With, Ahmadabad, accordingly.&#8221, GECTO, GECTO, Hence Appellant, GECTO, Moti Sindholi, Moti Sindholi, R‐2, GECTO, R‐2, Moti Sindholi, Moti Sindholi, GETCO Nani Khakher, GETCO, R‐2, R‐2, GERC, R‐2, R‐2, GETCO, R‐2, Appellant, Order, Stated, Nos, Order, Appellant, R‐2, GETCO, R‐2, Legal Maxims, legalprocedure.&#8221, Madan Lal Yadav, GETCO, GETCO, R‐2, Bangalore, Distribution Licensee, GERC, Order, GERC, 31.1.2010, Order, Regulations, Order, Order, Order, Appellant, GETCO, R‐2

WORK_OF_ART: Regulations for Procurement of Power from Renewable Sources, Wind Power Policy, Renewable Sources of Energy, Wind Power Policy, Appellant, Wind Power Policy, 25.5.2009, The Appellant, Wind Energy Generator, Wind Energy Generator, Wind Energy Generator, Wind Power Policy, Wind Power Policy, Wind Power Policy, Stated, Wind Power Policy, Wind Power Policy, 05.03.2009, Wind Power Policy, Wind Power Policy, Wind Power Policy, Wind Energy Generator, Wheeling Agreement with Appellant, Wind Power Policy, Wind Power Policy, Regulation on Renewable Energy, Open Access Consumer, Wind Power Policy, Wind Power Policy

QUANTITY: 1500 kW, 33/220 kV, 33/220 kV

LOC: Kutch, Kutch District, ONGC’s, Govt

MONEY: 8220;The, 8220;3, 8230;………&#8230, 8220;In, as “reduce&#8221, 8220;reduce&#8221, 8220;reduce&#8221, 8230, 8220;Certificate, 8220;Thus, 8220;1, 8230;……………………&#8230, 8220;It, 8220;RESOLUTION, 8216;Ex‐Bus&#8217, 8230;……………………&#8230, 2003 Act, #8220;The Commission, 8220;…it, 8220;Notwithstanding

EVENT: Policy date, the 2007 Policy

PERCENT: 4%, 4%, 24 Wind, 24 Wind, 4%, 4%, 4%, 10%, 7%, 4%

FAC: R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, SEB

NORP: Captive

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //