In the Matter Of: M/S. Tata Steel Limited, Mumbai and Others Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission, Nayapalli and Others

Decided On : May-30-2011

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 86(4, the Electricity Act, the Section 61, section 42, Section 61(g) &, Electricity (Amendment) Act, Act 26 of 2007, Section 62(3, Section 61(g, the Electricity Act, Section 62, the Electricity Act, Section 62(3, the Electricity Act, The Electricity Act, Section 61, Section 62, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 61(g, Section 61, Section 61(g, Section 55, Section 8.2.1, Section 62(3

CARDINAL: 102,103 and 112, 1, 2, 2, 2.1, 2.2, 9.12.2004, 22.3.2005, 20.3.2008, 2.3, 20.3.2008, 2.4, 142, 2.5, 3., 4., 4.1, 132, 4.2, 4.3, 5., 2, 6, 8., 9, 1998&#8221, 10, one, 11, one, 12, 2, 13, 1, 30, 2, 3, 1, 2.40, 3.60, 8.5, 38,39,40, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 374, 376, two, 5.5.2, 377, one, 25, 379, three, 26, 381, 383, three, 8.3.2, 17.36, 31.562010-11EHT, 327.37379.93383.68 219.2152.0056.31, 17.20, 33.03Thus, 27, 9, 18.0202008, 27.0102009, 19.01.2009, 28, 110, 29, 30, 2, Only about 1/4th, 11, 2, 31, 33, 11, 0.4, 220/132, zero, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, three, 420, 590, 110, 40, 41, 41.1, 41.2, 2007(APTEL, 931, 41.3, 31, 35, 41.4, 41.5, one, 39, 42, 43, 2011.&nbsp

DATE: 2010, 20th March, 2010, Annual, three years, 2008, 16.3.2010, 2010-11, 30.11.2009, 2009, 2010-11, 20.3.2010, 2010-11, the previous year, March, 2008, 16.3.2010, 2003, five years, six months, the end of year 2010-2011, the end of year 2010-2011, 2010-11, 1+, the last few decades, 2004, the end of year 2010-11, 2007, 15.6.2007, the year 2007, the end of the year 2010-11, the end of, 2010-11, 2003, 2004, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2003, 6 months, the end of year 2010-11, 2003, 2003, 2010-11, 2004, 2007, 2007, APTEL 1592, 2007, 02.06.2006, 1 July 2009, 2007, 2003, 1998, 2003, 2003, 2003, six months, January 6, 2006, July 6, 2006, the end of the year 2010-11, six years, the expiry of two years, March, 2007, 32, 35, 2007, the previous year, next six months, 40, this 30th day of May

ORG: M/s. Tata Steel Ltd., Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd., M/s. Balasore Alloys Limited, Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission, Retail Supply Tariff, the North Eastern Electricity Supply Company Limited, The State Commission, Ferro, Extra High Voltage, no.2, the Orissa Power Transmission Corporation Limited, The State Commission, the State Commission, the High Court, The High Court, State, the State Commission, Sections 61 and 62 of the 2003 Act, the State Commission, The State Commission, ARR, the State Commission, Ferro, The State Commission, ARR, the State Commission, Extra High Voltage, EHV, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Extra High Voltage, EHV, the State Commission, the High Court, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Statement of Objects, the State Electricity Boards, the State Governments, the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, The State Electricity Regulatory Commissions, a)………&#8230, the Appropriate Commission, the National Electricity Policy, Appropriate Commission, State Commission, the National Electricity Policy, Appropriate Commission, the National Electricity Policy, SERC, Tariff Policy, SERC, Tariff, Weighted, Tariff Policy, The National Electricity Policy, the Central Government, State, Tariff Principles, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, National Electricity Policy, the State Commission, Appropriate, Appropriate, Parliament, The National Electricity Policy, the State Commission, the Tariff Regulation 7, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, Determination of Tariff) Regulations, Commission, the Retail Tariff, Distribution Licensees, Commission, Commission, Commission, Tariff Policy, SERC, Commission, National Electricity Policy and Tariff Policy, the National Electricity and Tariff Policy, the Clause 8.3 of the Tariff Policy, the National Electricity Policy, BPL, National Tariff Policy and Electricity Policy, Commission, un, State, Tariff Policy and, The State Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, the Tariff Policy and, National Electricity Policy, the State Commission, the State Commission, Extra High Tension, Allied Agricultural Activities, Allied Agro Industrial Activities, EHT, The State Commission, GRIDCO, State, Tariff Policy, National Electricity Policy, State, State, State, EHT, Regulation 7, Determination of Tariff, EHT, NESCO, Commission, Tariff Policy, State, Cross &, the State Commission, ARR, the State Commission, the State Commission, Regulation 7, the State Commission, EHT, Punjab Electricity Regulatory Commission, Retail Limited v/s, Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, ELR, Retail Limited v/s, Maharashtra Electricity Electricity and Ors, Kashi Vishwanath Steel Limited, Uttaranchal Electricity Regulatory Commission, Ors, Retail Limited v/s, Maharashtra Electricity Electricity and Ors, Multiplex Association of India v/s, Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, Retail Ltd. Vs, MaharashtraElectricity Regulatory Commission, APTEL 931 Siel Limited, PSERC, Ors, Commission, Commission, Commission, Tariff, Tariff, Tariff, Commission, Commission, the Government of of, the Tariff Policy, Commission, Commission, Commission, the words &#, Tariff, the National Tariff Policy, Tariff, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the Central Electricity Authority, the Tariff Policy, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, ARR, ARR, ARR, EHT, GRIDCO, ARR, Return on Equity, Interest on Loan, Segregating Power Purchase, the State Commission, the State Commission, category= Total, ARR, ARR, the State Commission, Appellants, the State Transmission Licensee, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Annual Revenue Requirement, The State Commission, EHT, EHT, ARR, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, ARR, the National Electricity Policy, Tariff Policy, the State Commission, the State Commission, Regulation 7, the State Commission, PSERC, Ors, The State Commission, the State Commission, ARR, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Tariff Policy, the State Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Tariff Policy, The State Commission

GPE: Orissa, Orissa, New Delhi, India, electro, New Delhi

PRODUCT: Judgment, Year(1)Level, Judgment, Judgment

PERSON: Low Voltage, Reasons, Bill, Surcharge, Surcharge, Licensee, Licensee, Kutir Jyoti, Purpose, Regulations, 8211;subsidy, Order, meter

LOC: Policy, Policy, Policy

ORDINAL: first, First, first, first, first

MONEY: 8220;4, 8230;……………………………&#8230, 8220;61, 8220;5.5.1, 8220;5.5.3, 8220;7, 8230;………&#8230, 8230;………………&#8230, 8220;As, 8220;category&#8221, 8220;Average&#8221, 8220;Average&#8221, 20 per cent, 20 per cent

PERCENT: at least 50%, ± 20 %, ±20%, 5%, 5%, ± 20%, ±20%, at least 50%, ±20%, ±20%, ±20%, ± 20%, at least 50%, 100%, 100%, ± 20%, 80%, ± 20%, Only 68%, 80%, ± 20%, ± 20%, ±20%, ± 20%, about 33%, 80%, 20%, ± 20%, ± 20%, 20%, 20%, ±20%, ± 20%, 80%

EVENT: supply(6)2009-10EHT, APTEL 931