M/S. Ispat Industries Ltd, Vs. Maharashtra State Electricity Dist. Co. Ltd, Mumbai and Another

Decided On : Dec-14-2009

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: the Electricity Act, Power Purchase Agreement, the Reliability 12, Section 62

PERSON: M. Karpaga Vinayagam, C.S. Vaidyanathan, Vikas Singh, Paise

ORG: Ispat Industries Ltd., the Maharashtra State Commission, the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., Respondent the Distribution Company the State Commission, Additional Supply Charges for Note, Tribunal, BS Judgment in Appeal No, the State Commission, Additional, the Distribution Company, Additional, The Distribution Company, the State Commission, The State Commission, the Distribution Company, the State Commission, the Distribution Company, Appellant Company, The Appellant Company, Appellant, The State Commission, Additional, the Distribution Company, Additional, the State Commission, un, Additional Supply Charges, State, The Distribution Company, Humanist Consumer Council, Consumer Council, Additional Supply Charges, Additional Supply Charges, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Humanist Consumer Council, Paise/kwh, Appellant, Appellant, the State Commission, the Humanist Consumer Council, the State Commission, the Vidharba Association, Association, ABR, Vidharba Association, Appeal, Post, Consumer Category Energy Charges Effective, Appellant, Additional Supply Charges, the State Commission, the Additional Supply Charge, un, the State Commission, the Distribution Company, the State Commission, Additional, the State Commission, Additional, Association, Act, the State Commission, the Humanist Consumer Council, the State Commission, the Review Petition, the State Commission, the Distribution Company, the Review Petition, the Distribution Company, the Review Petition, the Distribution Company, Tribunal, the Appeal the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission

GPE: Kolkata

FAC: the Appellant herein

DATE: 15.06.2009, the 1st, 20.10.2006, 18.12.2009, 2009, 20.06.2008, the financial year 2006-07 and 2007-08, staggering day, 15.06.2009, 2009, the year 2006, 2003, daily, 7 days, 1 day, 1.8.2009, 2009, 20.10.2006, the financial year 2006-07 and 2007-08, 24.02.2009, 2009, the year 2009-10, daily, one-day, 15.6.2009

LOC: Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Pen circle, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Respondent, Reliability, Respondent, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Reliability, Respondent, Reliability

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

CARDINAL: 2., 3., 1, 2, 17, 135, 4, 5., zero, 6., 7, 4, 17, 135, 20.6.2008, 8., 9, 1.04, 19, Zero, 19, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 28, 16, 17, 18, 1.8.2009, 4.30 5.05, 3.95, 19, Zero, 11, 17, 135, 20, 20.6.2008, 21, 17, 135, 22, 23, 3, 24, 20.6.2008, 25, 26, 24, 7, 1, 1, 27, 1, 1.8.2009, 18, 19, 28

ORDINAL: 2nd

PERCENT: 7%, around 7%

NORP: Urban

MONEY: 8220;since, #8220;The Commission, 8220;Keeping