M/S. Utkal Chamber and Commerce and Industry Vs. Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission Vidyut Niyamak Bhawan and Others

Decided On : May-24-2011

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: Section 61, the Electricity Act, Section 61, The Electricity Act, Section 108 of the Act, Section 12, Section 65 of the Act, Section 65 of the Electricity Act 2003, Section 65, the Electricity Act, Section 62, Section 108, Section 108, the Electricity Act, Section 61, the Electricity Act, Tariff and Conditions, Regulations 5, Section 61, the Electricity Act, the Appellant M/s. Utkal Chamber of Commerce, Section 61, the Electricity Act, Section 61, Section 12, the Electricity Act, Judgment in Appeal No, Section 108 of the Act

ORG: PER HON’BLE MR, Appellants, the State Commission, the Retail Supply Tariff, Appeals, the State Commission, the HT Consumers, the Distribution Judgment in Appeal No, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellants, Appeals, EHT, The Learned Counsel, Appellants, the State Commission, ARR, the HT Consumers, the Orissa Electricity Regulatory Commission, Determination of Tariff) Regulations, ARR, National Electricity Policy, Commission, the High Tension Consumers, The State Government, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, HT/EHT Consumers, Commission, the Learned Counsel, the Learned Counsel, Respondents, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Distribution Licensees, ARR, the State Government, U/S 108 of the Act, State, the Learned Counsel, the HT/EHT Consumers, Appellants, the State Commission, Appellant, the Distribution (Conditions of Supply, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, EHT, NTPC Power Stations, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Distribution Licensees, the State Commission, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Commission, the State Government, the State Commission, the State Judgment in Appeal No, the State Government, the State Commission, Commission, the State Government, the State Commission, The State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Commission, the State Government, The State Commission, the State Government, the State Government, Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, WESCO, NESCO, SOUTHCO, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, EHT, the State Commission, The State Commission, EHT, EHT Group, EHT, Commission, EHT, Commission, GRIDCO, Commission, GRIDCO, GRIDCO, EHT, EHT, EHT, NTPC, GRIDCO, EHT, HT EHT Consumption, HT Total Rate, P/KWH, P/KWH, EHT Total Rate, P/KWH, P/KWH, the State Commission, the State Commission, EHT, the State Commission, Tariff Regulation, Commission, Appellants, the State Commission, EHT, EHT, Load Factor, HT EHT Consumption, The State Commission, the State Commission, EHT, EHT, the State Commission, the State Commission, North Eastern Electricity Company of, NESCO, RST, the Judgment in Appeal No, NESCO, Ferro, the Energy Charges, Load Factor, Industries, the Respondent CESU, EHT, the State Commission, Ferro Alloys Industries, NESCO, HT/EHT, Concessional, the OERC Distribution (Condition Supply Code, Concessional, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellants, RST, the Judgment in Appeal No, EHT, RST, NESCO, Appellant, the Central Electricity Supply Utility of Orissa, RST, RST, RST, HT/EHT, RST, Ferro, Tribunal, Tribunal, Export Oriented Ferro Alloys Industries, Special Tariff, the State Commission, the State Commission, Regulations, under:- &, Tariff Order, EHT Consumers, the Retail Supply Tariff, the State Commission, Transmission Charges and Distribution, the State Commission, the Transmission Tariff, Retail Supply Tariff, the State Commission, the Judgment in Appeal No, EHT, Appeal, M/S. Tata Steel Limited, NESCO, State Commission, Tribunal, NESCO, NESCO, The Supreme Court, judgments…&#8230, RST, BSP, Appellants, the State Commission, the Respondent Distribution Company, EHT, EHT, EHT, the State Commission, the Judgment in Appeal No, the State Commission, EHT, Bulk Supply Tariff, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Distribution Company, Bulk Supply Tariff, Appellant, Tribunal, the Regulatory Commission, Commission, Commission, The State Commission, Commission, WESCO NESCO SOUTHCO Approved Dist, the State Commission, Business Plan, Bulk Supply, Transmission, EHT, the State Commission, The Distribution Licensees, Retail Supply Tariff, Reduction, the Govt Subsidy, the Retail Supply Tariff, the Distribution Licensees, the HT Consumers for the Supply of Electricity, Appellants, the State Commission, the Judgment in Appeal No, the State Commission, Commission, The State Commission, EHT, The State Commission, State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, EHT Consumers, The State Commission, the State Commission, EHT, The State Commission, EHT, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Government, the State Commission, the State Government, Appeals, the State Commission

PERSON: JUSTICE M. KARPAGA VINAYAGAM, Licensee, Regulations, Paise, Bulk, Tariff, Consumption Ratio, Consumption Ratio, Consumption Ratio, Bulk, Bulk, Written Submissions

CARDINAL: 23.3.07, 2, 127, 48, 3., 4., 5., 127, 127, 48, 127, 6, 127, 48, 127, 8, 9, 10, 127, 48, 12, 13, 127, 48, 41.90, 150/180, 170/200, 127, 48, 15, 16, 127, 48, 18, 1.2.2007, 127, 48, 19, 127, 48, 20, 21, 127, 22, 1.2.2007, 23, 127, 48, 24, 25, 127, 48, 26, 5.36, 127, 48, 5.35, 120.85, 25, 95.85, 127, 48, 135.66, 95.85, 39.81, 41.90, 05-06, 150/180, 170/200, 42, 290, 127, 202, 300, 290, 225, 202, 220, 202, 5.36, 279, 127, 48, more than 15 to 16, 348.53 346.26, 360.88 360.88, 20, 295.05, 301.26, 13.33, 308.34, 3.67, 127, 48, 50%&#8221, 28, 41.90, 29, 5(1, 26, 49, 127, 48, 1.3.2005, 31, 1.4.2007, 127, 48, 300, 290, 225, 202, 220, 202, 32, 33., 34, 127, 5.48.1, 127, 48, 127, 48, 5.32.3, 5.32.23, 2, 38, 127, 39, one, 127, 48, four, 40, 127, 48, 41, 1.4.2005, 127, 48, four, Four, four, 43., 127, 48, 1, 127, 48, 48., 127, 48, 41.90, 127, 48, one, 50, 51., One, 127, 48, 2.33 2.26, 3.41 3.42, 2.76, 127, 48, 127, 48, 127, 48, 79, 27, 56, 57, 127, 48, 59, 73.54, 127, 48, 127, 48, 127, 1.4.05, 127, 1.2.2007, 1.2.2007, 127, 48, 61, 52

DATE: the year 2007-08, Annual, 2007, 2010, 2007, 48 of 2010, 2007, 2010, 2009, 2007, 48 of 2010, 2007, the year 2009, 2007, 48 of 2010, the year 2007-2008, 2007, monthly, 2004, any year, 2007, 2010, FY 2005-06, earlier years, the next three years, 2007, 2010 14, annual, the year 2007-08, 2007, 2010 17, 2007-08, 2009, 2007, 2010, 1995, 2003, 2007, 2010, 2003, 2007, 48 of 2010, 2004, 2007-08, 2007, 2010, 2001-2002, 2007-08, the previous year, any year, 2007, 2010, 23.3.2007, the year 2005-06, 2007, year 2007-08, 2006-07, 2005-06, the next three financial years, 2005-06, that year, 2007, 07-08, 2007-08, 2007, 48 of 2010, Today, the Financial Year 2006-07, 2007, 2010 16, 2007, 2010, annual, 2004, 2007, the next 03 years, 2003, 2007-08, 2007, 2010, 2009-10, 03 years w.e.f 1.4.2005, 2007, 48 of 2010, 35, 2006-07, 2007-08, 23.3.2007, 36, 2006-07, 2007, 2010, three years, monthly, 2007, 2010, 2004, 37, Annual, 2007, 48 of 2010, 23 March, 2007, 2007-08, the year 2005-06, 2007, March, 2006, 2006-07, the year 2007-08, 19th October, 2006, 2007, 2010, 2005-06, 2006-07, 03 years, 2005-06, 2006-07, March, 2006, 2005-06, 03 years, 2005-06, 2007, 2010 42, No.232 of 2006, 12th November, 2007, 44, 2007, 45, 2004, 2007, 47, any year, 23.3.2007, the pervious period, 2007, 2010, the next three Financial years, 49, 2006, 2007, 2007, 2010, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2.79 52, 2007, 2010, more than 4 years, the next three years, 2007, 2010, 2007-08, 54, 2007, 2010 55, 2006, 1.2.2007., 2006-07, 2006-07, the year 2007-08, 2007, 2006-07, 2006-07, 2007-08, 58, the year 2007-08, 2007, the year 2007-08, the year 2007-08, 2007, 2010, 2007, 48 of 2010, three years, 2007, 48 of 2010, 2009, 1985, 2007

PRODUCT: Respondent, Application, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, 337.35 335.348 2.00, Appellant, Agreement, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

WORK_OF_ART: The Distribution Licensee, Low Judgment in Appeal No, Judgment in Appeal No, Judgment in Appeal No, Judgment in Appeal No, the Contract Demand, Export Oriented Ferro Alloys, Judgment in Appeal No, Bulk Supply Tariff

PERCENT: 31%, 11.5%, 6.8%, 13%, 35%, 10% to 13%, 50%, 5.3%, 5.6%, 5%, 50%, 50%, 60%, 60%, around 5.5%, 80%, 5.5%, 80%, 5.3%, 75%, 4.4%, 70%, 10.71 3.4%, 65%, 2.4%, 60%, 4.17 1.2%, 55%, 0.7%, 50%, 0.00 0.0%, 80%, 15.75 5.6%, 75%, 4.6%, 70%, 3.6%, 65%, 2.4%, 60%, 1.1%, 55%, 0.6%, 50%, 0.00 0.0%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 60%, 60%, 25%, 50%, 80%, 35%, only 2%, above 50%, 100%, nearly 100%, 100%, 10 to 13%, 50%, 50%, only 5% to 6%, 31%, 33.75%, 33.00%, 31.51%, 36.50%, 32.80%, 43.40%, 25.00%, 26.00%, 30.40%, 5% to 6%

MONEY: 8220;65, 8220;5.35, 135.66 &#, 293.05, 326.07 322.402, 8220;The, 8220;5, 8220;2005, 8211

EVENT: the Financial Year, the Financial Year 2005-06, 329.14 321.45, the Financial Year, Financial Year 2005-06, the Financial Year 2006-07, Financial Year 2005-06, Para 5.35

GPE: Financial, Orissa

LOC: the Financial year, the Financial year, the Financial year, Respondent, Respondent, Policy

NORP: DISCOMS, DISCOMS, DISCOMS, Policy

ORDINAL: first