Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

In the Matter Of: Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd Vs. Devangere Sugar Company Limited and Another

Decided On : May-18-2010

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: the Electricity Act, the Notice of Termination, the Notice of Termination, the Notice of Termination, the Notice of Termination, Article 6, Article 5.1., the Termination Notice, Article 6.2, article 10, Article 6, Article 6.1 to 6.7, the Notice of Termination, section 63, the Indian Contract Act, the Notice of Termination, the Notice of Termination, the Notice of Termination, the Termination Notice, the Notice of Termination, the Notice of Termination of Contract, the Notice of Termination, the Notice of Termination

PERSON: Justice M. Karpaga Vinayagam, Bangalore, Appellant, P. Appa Rao, Shrinivas Kini, Ratilal Bhagwandas, Krishna Bahadur Vs, Ohers, Jagan Bandhu Chatterjee Vs, Nilima Rani, al Singh, Singh Vs, Kamala Singh, Anupam Gupta, Rao Shankar Rao Deshmukh

ORG: Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Limited, Devangere Sugar Company Limited, Appellant, the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission, State Commission, The State Commission, Tribunal, the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, KPTCL, KPTCL, R-1, Agreement, R-1, 06.06.2009, the State Load Dispatch Centre, SLDC, the Central Commission, the Central Commission, SLDC, the State Government, the High Court, Appellant, the State Commission, the High Court, the State Commission, the Letter of Credit, LOC, the Letter of Credit, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, The Learned Senior Counsel, The Letter of Credit, LOC, The Learned Senior Counsel, Chart, LOC, LOC, LOC, LOC, the State Commission, Tribunal, Appellant, Appellant, LOC, Tribunal, the Notice of Termination, the Learned Senior Counsel, Appellant, Monthly Energy Charges, the Delivered Energy, the Commercial Operation Date, the Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy Sources of the GOI.&#8221, Clauses, Load Despatch Centre, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the Delivered Energy, Indian Rupees, the Tariff Invoices, Corporation, Corporation, SBI, Tariff Invoices, the Corporation (Appellant, Corporation, SBI, Letter of Credit, LOC, Letter of Credit, the Commercial Operation Date of the Project, Corporation, Scheduled Bank, Corporation, Corporation, the Letter of Credit, Tariff Invoice, Tariff Invoice, the Letter of Credit, Corporation, Tariff Invoice, Company, Corporation, LOC, LOC, the Corporation (Appellant, LOC, LOC, LOC, LOC, the Corporation (Appellant, Event of Default by Corporation, Corporation, the Default Notice, the Company (Respondent, Termination Notice, Company, the Event of Default, the Default Notice, Corporation, the Default Notice, Agreement, Corporation, Company and Corporation, the Event of Default, Corporation, Appellant, Appellant, LOC, the High Court, Default Notice, BESCOM &#, BESCOM, BESCOM, BESCOM, the Letter of Credit, LOC, the Corporation (Appellant, LOC, the Corporation (Appellant, Agreement, Corporation, BESCOM, SBI, MW, KERC, KERC, LOC, BESCOM, LOC, LOC, LOC, the High Court, the Default Notice, Default, the Letter of Credit, LOC, LOC, LOC, Default Notice, Appellant, LOC, the Learned Senior Counsel, the Learned Senior Counsel, LOC, the Learned Senior Counsel, the State Commission, LOC, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, High Courts, AIR 1974 SC 2089, AIR 1989, SC, Puna Theatre, Ors, Sind Bank, Sikkim Subba Association Vs, LOC, the Default Notice, LOC, LOC, Default Notice, the Default Notice, LOC, LOC, Appellant, LOC, Notice of Termination, LOC, the State Commission, LOC, Appellant, the Central Commission, LOC, LOC, Letter of Credit, This Letter of Credit, Corporation, Corporation, expiration&#8221, Corporation, LOC, the Company (Respondent, LOC, LOC, LOC, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, LOC, Default Notice, the Leaned Senior Counsel, Commission, the Learned Senior Counsel, The Learned Senior Counsel, Commission, Tribunal, the Learned Senior Counsel, Appellant, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Tribunal, SC, AIR 1992, SC, AIR 1999, SC 647 State of Punjab V/s R.N. Bhatnagar, the Default Notice, the Default Notice, the Appellant the Default Notice, Notice of Termination, The Default Notice, the Default Notice the Appellant, Respondents, the High Court, Appellant, the Notice of Termination, Appellant, Notice of Termination, Notice of Termination, Corporation, Letter of Credit, Default Notice, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, LOC, the Default Notice, Default Notice, the High Court, Notice of Termination, Notice of Termination

LOC: the Appellant herein, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

ORDINAL: first, third, third, third, third, third, third, first, first, third, third, first

CARDINAL: 2., 3, 4, 5, 6, only under two, 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 02.07.2009, 11, 09.06.2005, 12, 13, 14, 1, 2, 3, 02.07.2009, 15, 1, 2, 3, 16, 17, 18, 19, 5.1, 2.25, Two and twenty five, 20, 6.1, 6.2, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.2, fifteen, 6.3, 21, 6.2, 6.3, 22, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 23, one, thirty, one, 24, 25, 6.3, 26, 27, 30, 28, 29, 20, 16,79,459/-, 1,24,61,526/-, 20, 1,24,61,526/-, 6.6, 01.06.2005, 30, 31, 6.3, 09.06.2005, 6.5, 20, 6.6, 32, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 33, 2.7.2009, 34, 35, 12, 14/07, 36, 1, 2, 689, 3, 229, 4, 2, 925, 5, 533, 6, 5, 629, 37, 1, 2, 3, 4, two, one, one, 5, 38, 1, 1, 2.7.2009, 2, 02.07.2009, 2,41,32,390/-, 3, 14/07, 14/07, 14/07, 14/07, 3.32, 18/08, 10.4.2008, 4, 12.4, 6.6, 39, one, 12.4, 40, one, 41, 05.07.2003, 09.06.2005, 43, 12.06.2009, 44, 5, 11, 932, 10, 16, 738, 6, 45, 22.07.2009, 48, 02.07.2009, 1, 2, one, 30.6.2009, 2.7.2009, 2.7.2009, 50

PRODUCT: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Agreement, Appellant, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

GPE: the State of Karnataka, Karnataka, 08.07.2009, 08.07.2009, 08.07.2009, Billing, Karnataka, BESCOM, BESCOM, Karnataka, Sikkim, 08.07.2009, 08.07.2009, Karnataka

DATE: the eleventh year, 3 months, 2003, 17.01.2002, 10.6.2009, the 30 days, 08.07.2009, 17.01.2002, 08.07.2009, the past 3 years, 10.06.2009, 12.06.2009, 30 days, 12.06.2009, The 30 days, 12.07.2009, 15 days, the year 2004, the period of, 15 days, 60 days, the expiry of, 30 days, 30 days, 02.07.2009, the expiry of 30 days, the year 2004, the period of, 15 days, 60 days, the first 10 years, the year 1994-95, the previous year, 6.3, 15) days, 15 days, 15 days, 30) days, 30 days, monthly, less than 60 days, 30 days, 30 days, 30 days, the expiry of 30 days, thirty) days, 10.06.2009, 02.07.2009, 10.06.2009, the period March 2004 to July 2007, June 2005 to July 2007, the period March, 2004 to June 2005, the period July 2005 to March 2008, the period January 2009 to March 2009, 30 days, 17.01.2002, 30 days, 10.06.2009, 02.07.2009, 17.01.2002, 30.06.2009, March 09 to May 09, very few days, 60 days, 17.01.2002, monthly, 10.06.2009, 02.07.2009, the period March 2004 to June 2005, July 2005, March 200, the period January 2009 to March 2009, 10.6.2009, 02.07.2009, 3 years, 17.01.2002, 3 years, 1970, 2006, 2001, 10.06.2009, 10.06.2009, 10.6.2009, 10.06.2009, 10.06.2009, 02.07.2009, 22.07.2009, 8.7.2009, 3 years, 30 days, less than 60 days, 3 years, 30 days, 3 years, 17.01.2002, 3 years, 42, 10.6.2009, 30 days, the expiry of, 30 days, 1977, 1994, 10.06.2009, 30 days, 12.06.2009, the 30 days, 12.07.2009, 30 days, 46, 10.06.2009, 30 days, 30 days, 47, 30 days, 30 days, 08.07.2009, 30 days, 30 days, exactly 30 days, the expiry of, 30 days, 30 days, the expiry of, 30 days, 49, 15 days, 10.6.2009, 30 days, 8.7.2009, 10.6.2009, the expiry of, 30 days, 30 days, the expiry of, 30 days

WORK_OF_ART: Appellant, The Default Notice, The Letter of Credit, Supplemental Agreement 09.06.2005

FAC: the Metering Point, the Term of the Agreement, the Term of this Agreement, Notice, Appellant, Default Notice, Appellant, the Default Notice

PERCENT: 5%, 2%, 1.8%, 2%, 1.8%

MONEY: 8220;an, 8211, 8211, 8220;a, #8220;The Corporation, 8220;Any

EVENT: 02.07.2009

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //