Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd, Mumbai Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, Mumbai and Others

Decided On : Apr-27-2011

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: 31.3.2010, Section 64 of 2003 Act, Section 64, section 62, the True Up for, Section 64(3, Section 64(3, 31.3.2010, the Tariff Regulations, the Income Tax Act, the Companies Act, the Income Tax Act, the Companies Act, Section 131 of the Act, Tariff Regulations&#8221, Section 64(3

CARDINAL: 1, 1., 2 to 10, 2, 115, 3, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3, 25.4.2007, 10.4.2008, 3.4, 4.11.2008, 3.5, 115, 115, 3.6, 5.3.2010, 3.7, 82, 5.3.2010, 4, 5.3.2010, 5, 9, 6, 10.4.2008, 12, Appellant’s, 7, 7.1, 10.4.2008, 7.2, 10.4.2008, 20.6.2008, only two, two, one, 14.11.2008, 7.3, 7.4, 10.4.2008, 7.5, 1, 3, one hundred and twenty days, 1, 7.6, 10.4.08, 7.7, 19.1.2010, 7.8, 7.9, 17.8.09, 8, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 5.3.2010, 919.12, 948.11, 3.26, 3.26, 32.41 61.25, 883.45, 29.00, 854.45, 8.4, 948.11, 93.66, 854.45, 854.45, 8.5, 8.6, 8.7, 8.8, 9, 9.1, 9.2, 9.3, 27, 9.4, 10, 10.1, 10.2, 12, 11, 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 31.1.1(b, 11.4, 11.2, 12, 12.1, 32.3, 12.2, 12.3, 32.1, 32.2, 31.3, 31.4, 32.3, 1/10, 32.1, 32.3, 12.4, 1, 32.3, 12.5, 1, 1, 13, 13.1, 10.4.2008, 13.2, 10.4.2008, 13.3, 5.3.2010, 13.4, 14.1, 10.4.2008, 14.2, 10.4.2008, 14.3, 25.1, 5.3.2010, 15, 15.1, 15.2, 28.5.2009, 111, 7, 19, 16, 16.1.The, 16.2, 16.3, 16.4, 16.5, 16.6, 16.7, 16.8, 28.5.2009, 111, 17, 18

ORG: Maharashtra State Power Generation Company Limited, State, Generating Company, Maharashtra State Electricity Regulatory Commission, Associations, Consumer Representatives, Maharasthtra State Electricity Distribution Company, Appeal, the State Commission, State, the State Commission, the Aggregate Revenue Requirement, ARR, The State Commission, MYT, Appellant, State, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, Station Heat Rate, the State Commission, Central Power Research Institute, Appellant, the State Commission, Performance Review, The State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, 19.1.2010 the State Commission, The State Commission, Appellant, Tribunal, State, 19.1.2010, the State Commission, State, Operation, Deferred Tax Liability, Advance Against Depreciation, Reactive Energy Charges, Erroneous Disapproval of Interest, Working Capital, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Operation, the State Commission, the State Commission, CPRI, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Advance Against Depreciation, the Central Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Working Capital, the State Commission/Respondent no.1, Tribunal, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tariff Order, the State Commission, the Judgment of this Tribunal, The State Commission, NTPC, Central Power Research Institute, CPRI, The State Commission, CPRI, Tribunal, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, CPRI, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Appropriate Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Annual Performance Review, the Public Notice, APR, the State Commission, APR, the State Commission, CPRI, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, CPRI, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, North Delhi Power Ltd., CERC, ELR, APTEL 193, North Eastern Electricity Supply Company, APTEL 278, the State Commission, State Commission, State, the Capital Works, the Capital Works, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Existing Stations Upcoming Stations Total Gross, The State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Appellant, Regulations, Capital Works, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Capital Works, the State Commission, the Station Heat Rate, CPRI, CPRI, Station Heat Rate, The State Commission, the Station Heat Rate, The State Commission, the Station Heat Rate, CPRI, the Station Heat Rate, MSPGCL, Heat Rate, MSPGCL Stations, MZ/PST/MOR/Nil, MSPGCL Stations, ref, Committee, PLF, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Station Heat Rate, State, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, 31.3.2010, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Appellant, Regulation 31.1.1(b, The State Commission, Commission, Generating Company, the Generation Business, development reserve, the State Commission, the State Commission, Advance Against Depreciation, Appellant, Advance Against Depreciation, The State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, Appellant, Regulation 31.2, the Generating Company: Provided, the Generating Company, AAD, the State Commission/Respondent, State, the Generating Company, the State Commission, AAD, AAD, Regulations, the State Commission, AAD, Maharashtra State Electricity Board, the State Commission, Reactive Energy Charge, Tribunal, The State Commission, Tribunal, Appellant, Reactive Energy, Commission, inter &#, the Transmission Licensees, Distribution Licensees, Commission, The State Commission, CERC, Tribunal, Appellant, ARR, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, Working Capital, the State Commission, Working Capital, The State Commission, this Tribunal in the Judgment, Reliance Infrastructure Ltd., MERC, Ors, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Operation, the State Commission, the Capital Works, Respondent-1/State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, CPRI, the Station Heat Rate, the State Commission, The State Commission, Commission, Appellant, Commission, Advance Against Depreciation, The State Commission, AAD, Regulations, the State Commission, Reactive Energy Charge, The State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, Appellant, Tribunal, the State Commission, Working Capital, the State Commission, Working Capital, Tribunal, Reliance Infrastructure Ltd., MERC, Ors, Appeal, The State Commission, Judgment

DATE: 17.8.2009, 2008, 2008-09, FY 2009-10, FY 2005-06, 2007-08, FY 2008-09, 2006-07, 2006, 2007-08, 2009-10, the year 2007-08, 86, 87 of 2007, 2008, 2007-08, Annual, FY 2008-09, FY 2009-10, 2008, 17.8.2009, 2010, 17.8.2009, 19.1.2010, the years 2005-06 to 2007-08, 2007-08, 2007-08, monthly, 2010-11, 2005-06, the previous year, the current year, the previous year, 115/08, 17.8.2009, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10, 2005-06, 2007-08, FY 2008-09, 2007, 2007, 19.1.2010, the base year, the subsequent years, the base year 2006-07, the base year, 2006-07, 2006-07, 2006-07, 2006-07, 2006-07, 2006-07, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2006-07, the subsequent years, the subsequent years, subsequent years, the base year, 2007-08, FY 2008-09, the years 2005-06 to 2007-08, future years, FY 2005-06 to 2007-08, the years 2008, 2009, FY 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, the year 2008/2009, the year 2005-06 to 2007-08, years 2008, 2009, 2008-09, 2008-09, 2008-09, previous years, 13/10/2008, the year 2008-09, the past period, the years 2008/2009, these years, 2005-06, 12 months, the end of year 2009-10, FY 2005-06, the years 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, FY 2006-07, 4 years, monthly, 2010-11, the 12 months period of FY 2005-06, the 12 months, 2010-11, 5 years, FY 2006-07, 4 years, 2007-08, the year, the initial years, the later years, April 1, 2004, the financial year ending March 31,2005, April 1, 2004, the year, a particular year, 2007-08, 2007-08, the year, 32, each year, a year, September 30, each financial year, any financial year, such financial year, a financial year, such financial year, 14, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2005-06, three years, 3 years, the base year, the subsequent years, 2006-07, the subsequent years, the subsequent years, the subsequent years, 2007-08, the years 2005-06 to 2007-08, the past period, 2008-09, the past period, 2005-06, 12 months, 2010-11, 2005-06 to 2007-08, 2008-09, 2005-06, 16.9, a period of, three months, this 27th day of April, 2011

TIME: 19.1.2010 and, 2009-10 i.e., three months&#8221

MONEY: 5.3.2010, 8220;64, 8230;…&#8230, 8216;All, 8220;It, 8216;a, 8220;(b, 8220;in, 8220;32, 8220;actual&#8221, 8220;88, 8220;91, 8211, 8220;In, 8220;Hence, 8220;6

PRODUCT: Appellant, Commission’s, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Commission’s, Commission’s, Appellant, Appellant, Judgment, Appellant, Appellant, Judgment, Appellant, Judgment, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Commission’s, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Judgment, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Judgment, Judgment, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Judgment, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

EVENT: Multi Year Tariff, Financial Year

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second, first, Firstly, first, first, first, first, second, first, second, first

PERSON: Regulations, Buddy A. Ranganadhan, n-2, Deepa Chavan, Deepa Chavan, Buddy Ranganadhan, CPRI, CPRI, CPRI, CPRI, CPRI, Shri Buddy A. Ranganadhan, Order, REL, 19.1.2010, Maintenance Expenses, Regulations, CPRI

WORK_OF_ART: Renovation and Modernization

FAC: Judgment