In the Matter Of: Madhya Pradesh Power Trading Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission and Others

Decided On : May-06-2010

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: section 63, the Electricity Act, Section 63, the Electricity Act, Section 63, the Electricity Act, section 63, the Electricity Act, section 63, the Electricity Act, section 63, the Electricity Act, section 61, the Electricity Act, section 63, the Electricity Act, Section 63, the Electricity Act, section 62, Section 61, the Electricity Act, section 43-A of the Electricity (Supply) Act, section 61, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, section 62, the Electricity Act, section 62, the Electricity Act, section 63, the Electricity Act, section 63, section 62, section 63, the Electricity Act, Case 1, section 63, the Electricity Act, Article 3.1.2A of this Agreement, Power Purchase Agreement, section 63, the Electricity Act, MW under Case-1, MW under Case-1 M/s RPL, Case 1, Section 63 of the Act, section 63, section 63, the Electricity Act, section 63, the Electricity Act, Section 63, Section 63 of the Act

PERSON: Justice M. Karpaga Vinayagam, Kwh, Schedule, RFP Bid, Order No, Order, Bidder, Seller, Draft, Buyer, Seller, MoU, Lanco Infratech

ORG: Madhya Pradesh Power Trading Company Limited, Appellant, the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, State Commission, Reliance Power Limited, Essar Power Limited, the State Commission, the State of Madhya Pradesh, State, Appropriate Commission, the Central Government, the Government of India, the Government of India, State, the Government of India, Appellant, the Government of India, Appellant, the State Commission, The State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, Appellant, Company Capacity, MW, Lanco Infratech Ltd., MW, Reliance Power Ltd.(RPL, Essar Power Limited, KSK Energy Ventures Ltd, the Expert Committee, RPL, EPL, the State Commission, the Lanco Infratech Limited, the State Commission, the State Commission, Lanco Infratech Ltd., the State Commission, RPL, EPL, Negotiation Committee, RPL, EPL, RPL, The Board of Directors, RPL, the State Commission, the Essar Power Limited, Appellant, the State Commission, MW, RPL, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, Lanco Infratech Ltd., Lanco Infratech Ltd., the State Commission, the State Commission, MW, RPL, the State Commission, RPL, EPL, EPL, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, MW, EPL, the State Commission, the State Government, the State Government, the State Commission, the State Commission, RPL, EPL, the Central Government, Appellant, The Learned Counsel, The State Commission, the Government of India, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, the Expert Committee, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, Appellant, RPL, EPL, a Negotiating Committee, The State Commission, the State Transmission Utility, State, the Central Transmission Utility, the State Transmission Utility, the State Commission, The State Commission, RPL, EPL, the Learned Counsel, Commission, the Learned Counsel, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, RPL, EPL, the Central Government, the State Commission, the State Commission, Lanco Infratech Ltd, The State Government, MOU, RPL, State, Commission, the Central Government, Appropriate Commission, Central, Commission, the Government of India, the State Commission, the Central Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the National Electricity Policy, the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, the State Commission, the Central Government, Determination of Tariff &#, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, The Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Commission, Commission, State Commission, the words &#, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Central Government, RFP, the State Commission, RFQ, Lanco Infratech Limited, The Learned Counsel, the State Commission, the Central Government, Appellant, the Power Purchase Agreement, MW, EPL, MW, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the Learned Counsel, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the Lanco Infratech Ltd., the State Commission, the Bid Evaluation Committee, RFP, MoP, RFP, Company, MW, Lanco Infratech Ltd., M/s Reliance Power Ltd and M/s Essar Power Ltd, State, Commission, Discoms, Discoms, State Government/Commission, Commission, Commission, Power Trading Co. Ltd., Commission, Commission, Commission, MW, M/s Lanco Infratech Limited, the Power Purchase Agreement, Commission, c. MP Power Trading Co. Limited, Commission, MW, M/s Lanco Infratech Limited, The State Commission, RPL, EPL, State, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Lanco Infratech Limited, Commission, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, RFP, the Central Government, the State Commission, Appellant, RPL, RPL, Plant Load Factor, PLF, MW, PLF, PLF, State, State, the Supreme Court, Food Corporation of India, Messrs Kamdhenu Cattle Feed, the Supreme Court, the State Commission, the State Commission, Central Vigilance Commission, State, The Hon’ble Commission, State, Sasan Ultra Mega Power Project, Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, CERC, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Evaluation Committee, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, RFP, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Learned Counsel, the State Commission, the Power Purchase Agreement, MPSTU, MPSTU, the State of Madhya Pradesh, State, the Central/State Government, the Delivery Point, Madhya Pradesh Power Transmission Company Limited, MPSTU, MPSTU, the State of Madhya Pradesh, State, RFP, LOI, the Effective Date, Letter of Intent, RPL, the Expert Committee, the Evaluation Committee, the Evaluation Committee, Reliance Power Limited, RPL, Format-2, RPL, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Appellant: &, the Hon’ble Commission, the Delivery Point, STU, the Hon’ble Commission, the Government of India, GoI, the State Commission, RPL, STU, STU, EPL, Power Plant, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, EPL, RPL, the State Commission, RPL, the State Commission, RPL, the State Commission, Lanco Infratech Limited, the State Commission 20.08.2008, the State Commission, the State Government, EPL, LOI, the State Commission, MW, EPL, State Government, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Government, the State Commission, the State Government, Appellant, the State Commission, RPL, MoU, the State Government, the State Government, the State Commission, Reliance Power Limited, MOU, GoMP, MW, GoMP, M/s RPL, M.P. Power Trading Company Limited, MW, M/s RPL, M/s RPL, MOU, GoMP, M/s RPL, MOU, MW, MOU, M/s RPL, MOU, the State Government, the Appropriate Commission, MOU, MOU, The State Government, MOU, MOU, State, the State Commission, Lanco Infratech Limited, Commission, the State Commission, Lanco Infratech Limited, the Lanco Infratech Limited, the State Commission, Lanco Infratech Limited, the State Commission, Lanco Infratech Limited, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the Central Government, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, the Central Government, Expert Committee, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Expert Committee, Negotiation Committee, the State Government, Negotiation Committee, Expert Committee, the State Commission, the Learned Counsel, Commission, Commission, the Negotiation Committee, the State Government, the Expert Committee, Central Government, The Negotiation Committee, Central Government, the Expert Committee, the State Commission, the Negotiation Committee, the State Commission, the Evaluation Committee, RPL, RPL, RPL, the Evaluation Committee, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Central Government, the State Commission, the Evaluation Committee, the State Commission, Evaluation Committee, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Enquiry Commission, Vigilance Commission, the Evaluation Committee, the State Commission, the Evaluation Committee, the State Commission, Tribunal

LOC: the Appellant herein

CARDINAL: 2., two, 3, 4., 5., 6, 10/07, 8, 26.09.2007, 9, 4, 600, 2.701 3, 300, 4, 300, 10, 11, 12, 2.701, 2.45, 2.45, 2.45, 09.07.2008, 26.08.2008, 2.955, 2.45, 13, 150, 2.45, 14, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 1, 2, 3, one, 2.340, 4, 5, 2, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25., 26, 62, 1, two, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 27, 62 and 63, 27, 3, 1, 2, 3, 5.18, L2, 28, 2.45, 2.74, 2.99, 150, 2.45, 29, 30, 27.09.2007, 600, 1, 2, 3, 31, 2.34, 600, 32, 3, 600, 2, 3, 33, three, 34, 35, 0.25, 5457, 6139, 0.50, 150, 37, 1, 38, 39, 09.07.2008, 005, 40, 41, 42., 43, 47, 48, 49, 2, 2, 50, 52, 53, 26.8.2008, 29.12.2009, 55., 220, 57., 12.5.2008, 59, 12.5.2008, 2.45, 09.07.2008, 2.45, 24.07.2008, 28.10.2008, 150, 2.45, 60, two, two, 23.11.2009, 4000, 2.45, 2.4/, 30, 61, 2.45/, 62, One, 2.45, 2.34, 2.34, 20.08.2008, 2.45, 2.34, 63, 64, 5.16, 65, 66, one, 2.45, 67, 68, 69, 71, 1, 2, 3

DATE: 12th May 2008, 29th October 2009, 2003, 2003, 19.01.2005, 06.01.2006, 2003, 2000, 2003, 22.03.2007, 2000, 12.12.2007, 1241, 24.12.2007, 07.03.2008, 12.05.2008, 1241, 20.08.2008, 1241, 29.09.2008, 24.07.2009, 28.10.2008, 2003, 2003, 2003, 730 days, 730 days, May 2010, 2003, 730 days, 1002, 21, 2003, multi year, 1948, 1998, one year, 2003, 2003, 2003, one year, any financial year, 2003, 2003, 730 days, 1241, 25 years, 07.03.2008, last three years, September 2007, 2003, 25 years, 25 years, 25 years, 1337, 1493, 36, 91993, 20.08.2008, March 2007, 16Â, 17th October 2007, 07.03.2008, 07.03.2008, 07.03.2008, 44, 07.03.2008, 45, 46, 20.08.2008, 20.08.2008, 12 months, 14 months, (i), 12 months, 14 months, 07.03.2008, 54, 29.09.2008, 22.11.2008, 56, 730 days, 01.01.2007, 730 days, 31.12.2008, 58, 730 days, 08.05.2010, 27.05.2010, 06.01.2009, 1241, 1241, 1241, 1241, 07.03.2008, 07.03.2008, 07.03.2008, 07.03.2008, 70, 2003, 2003

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, L2, Appellant, Appellant, L2, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, 1241 M power, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Bidder, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Para 6.2, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

TIME: the minutes

GPE: 07.01.2008, 07.01.2008, L1, L1

WORK_OF_ART: Appellant, a Memorandum of Understanding, Appellant

FAC: Request for Qualification, MoU, MoU

ORDINAL: first, 26th, 3rd

MONEY: 8220;63, 8220;61, 8220;12, 8220;10, 8220;3.1.2, 8220;Transmission, 8216;not, 8220;The, 8220;Based

PERCENT: 80%, 90%, 80%, 90%, 30%

EVENT: the Procurer 51

NORP: Evaluation