Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Madhya Pradesh Power Generation Company Ltd Vs. Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission and Others

Decided On : May-06-2011

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: Section 2, Regulation 58, the Tariff Regulations, the Tariff Regulations, the Tariff Regulations, Section 5.3, Section 6, Section 6.2, Section 6.2, Section 61, Section 181 of the Electricity Act, Section 111 of the Act, Section 111 of the Act, the MYT Regulations, Section 111 of the Act, the Electricity Act, Section 111 of the Electricity Act, the MYT Regulations, Section 111 of the Electricity Act, Regulations 57, the MYT Regulations, Section 111 of the Act, Section 111 of the Act, Section 61 of the Act, section 61, the Tariff Regulations, Regulation 57, the MYT Regulations, the Constitution of India, Section 110, Section 111, Section 120, Section 121, Section 121, Section 86, section 42, the Grid Code, section 79, section 3.&#8221, Section 178, the Electricity Act, Section 179, Section 181, Section 111, the Electricity Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Electricity Act, Section 111, the Section 61 of the Act, the Electricity Act, Section 63, the Electricity Act, Section 61 of the Act, Section 63, Tariff in Part VII, the Electricity (Supply) Act, section 62, section 62, Section 86, Section 108, Section 121, Section 111, Constitution, Constitution, Article 226, Section 61, Section 121, the Electricity Act, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 62, Section 111, Section 61, Constitution, Section 6, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 115, Section 111, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 27

GPE: P.S., STPS, Sarni, Counsel, Sarni, India, DC, DC, Regulation, Jabalpur, Useful, Useful, Useful, States, Premium Granites, Kerala, Ramchandran, de Smith&#8217, S.N., Karnataka

PERSON: JUDICIAL, Generating Tariff, Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut, Jawahar Sagar Hydro Station, Amarkantak, Power Station, Sanjay Gandhi Thermal Power Station, Birsinghpur, Sanjay Gandhi Thermal Power Station, Birsinghpur, Sanjay Gandhi Thermal Power Station, Birsinghpur, Regulations, Sanjay Gandhi Thermal Power Station, vii, xiii, xiv, Tawa, xv, xvii, Heat Rate, Regulations, K.S Venkataraman, Vinod Seth, Padam Sen v/s State, Nain Singh V/s. Koonwarjee, M.G. Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Anr, Tamil Nadu, V. A.K. Roy, Karnatka, Anr, V.R. Vivekanand Swamy, V. M.E.R.C., V. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission, M.G. Ramachandran, M.P. Jain, Hiltaire Barnett-Constitutional, Administrative Law, Banasagar-IV, Madhikheda HPS, Sanjay Sen, Ramachandran, Regulations, Amarkantak, Tradeco, Tradeco, Modernization, Ramchandran, Regulations, Distribution Licensee, Regulations, Regulations, Regulations, Regulations, Tariff, Regulations, Gazette, Regulations, Schedule, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Regulations, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Ramchandran’s, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Anr, Tamil Nadu, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, M.P. Jain, Henry VIII, Vs A.K.Roy, Ramchandran, Ramachandra’s, Anr, R. Vivekanand Swamy, Ramchandran, Administrative Law, Ramachandran, Ramachandran, Ramachandran

ORG: Tribunal, the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Commission, Commission, Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board, the State of Madhya Pradesh, the Power House -1, the Satpura Thermal Power Station, Sarni, the Gandhi Sagar Hydro Station, the Rana Pratap Sagar Hydro Station, Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited, Rajghat Hydro Power Station, Maharashtra State Transmission Company Limited, the Pench Hydro Station, Generating Stations Date of Commission, Amarkantak Thermal Power Station, Amarkantak Thermal Power Station, House, House, Satpura Thermal Power Station (STPS, Satpura Thermal Power Station (STPS, Satpura Thermal Power Station (STPS, House, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Sanjay Gandhi Thermal Power Station at Birsingpur, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, The State Commission, The Sanjay Gandhi Thermal Power Station Unit No, MW, the State Commission, The State Commission, the Plant Availability/Load Factor, The State Commission, Plant Availability/Load Factor, the Plant Availability/Load Factor, The State Commission, Plant Availability/Load Factor, The State Commission, The State Commission, the Satpura Thermal Power Station Phase 1, MW, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, Plant Availability Factor, The State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, MPPGCL, The State Commission, The State Commission, Tariff Policy, The State Commission, the Central Commission, Central Generating Stations, Tariff Policy, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, Tribunal, BSES Rajdhani Power Limited V. Delhi Electricity Regulatory Commission, ELR APTEL 880, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited v., Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, the National Tariff Policy, Generating Companies, the National Tariff Policy, Coal India Limited, xviii)The State Commission, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, MYT, Tribunal, the MYT Regulations, Tribunal, Regulations, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Regulations, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Regulations, Commission, Calcutta Electricity Supply Company Ltd., Co. Pvt, Union Territory of Himachal Pradesh, Supreme Court Employees Welfare Association Vs Union, Sinai Vs Union, UP AIR 1219,and (, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, MYT Regulations, Tribunal, MYT Regulations, the Tribunal under Section 111 of the Act, Commission, the State Commission under Regulations, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Appellate Tribunal, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Limited, National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd and Ors, PTC India Limited V. C.E.R.C., Hindustan Paper Corporation Ltd., Hindustan Steels Ltd., S.N., V. Union of India, Bengal Electricity Regulatory Commission, CESC Limited, Cellular Operators Assn of, Union of India, MaharashtraState Power Generation Co. Ltd., Ors, ELR, APTEL, NTPC Ltd., Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board, ELR APTEL 7 13, BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd., ELR APTEL 880, Uttar Pradesh Rajya Vidyut Utpadan Nigam Limited V. Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Gujarat State Electricity Corporation Ltd., Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 4th Edition, the State Commission, MW, PLF, CEA, STPS, BHEL Turbine, BHEL Boiler/BHEL Turbine, CEA, MW Unit-1, PUF, Boiler/BHEL Turbine, MW, Year Plant Utilization Factor, PUF, PUF, PUF, BHEL/BHEL, ABL, CEA, Year Plant Utilization Factor, PUF, BHEL/BHEL ABL/BHEL, The State Commission, the State Commission, the Hydel Power Stations, Hydro Power, YEARLY, PAFM, WRD, Rajghat, these Power House, Hydro Generating Stations, MPPGCL, company&#8221, The State Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Rand M, Commission, Commission, Regulations, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal for Electricity, Tribunal, the Appropriate Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, The Central Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Commission, the State Commission, State Commission, the State Commission, State, State, State, 2)The State Commission, the State Government, State, the State Commission, State Commission, State Commission, the National Electricity Policy, Commission, Commission, Commission, Regulations, Tariff Regulations, Conduct of Business Regulation, Commission, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, Parliament, the State Commission, the State Commission, each House of the State Legislature, Unicamral, the State Commission, the Central Commission, Commission, Legislature, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, PTC India Ltd., CERC, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, The Hon’ble Supreme Court, The Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, Regulations, Appellate Tribunals, the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Securities and Exchange Board, the Securities and Exchange Board, the Telecom Disputes Settlement, Appellate Tribunal, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, the National Tariff Policy, National Electricity Policy, The First Generation Tariff, the Madhya Pradesh State Electricity Board, Commission, MPPGCL, Company, Commission, Commission, Satpura Thermal Power Station, Commission, observations:- &, Rand M of the STPS, Commission, power house &#, Commission, Commission, Company, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Company, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Satpura TPS, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Satpura, Commission, M/s. A.F. Ferguson, M/s. Deolittle Touche Tohmatsu India Pvt. Ltd., Commission, Review of Consolidated Annual Regulatory Compliance Report, Commission, 03.09.2008 the Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Generation Tariff, Commission, the State Commission, Commission, 09.03.2009 the Commission, Commission, Commission, NIT, Commission, NTPC, Commission, the M P Electricity Regulatory Commission, Generation Tariff) Regulations, Commission, STPS Sarni, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, State, MPPGCL, MPERC, Commission, MPERC, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Commission of the Commission, Commission, Commission, MPPGCL, Commission, the Government of India, MW Birsinghpur, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Tariff, Tribunal, Regulation, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Commission, Tariff, the Official Gazette of the Government of Madhya Pradesh, Commission, Project, Tariff, Commission, Project, the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Generation Tariff under Section 62, Tariff, the Central Government, the Generating Company and Beneficiaries, Tariff, Commission, Generating Company, Generating Company, Commission, The Multi-Year Tariff Principles, the Generating Company, the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission, Units, The Generating Company, the Generating Company, Beneficiaries, the Generating Company, Plant Load Factor, Commission, Tariff, the Generating Company, Commission, the Central Commission, CERC, Tariff Regulation, The Generating Company, Commission, Project Report, Beneficiaries, the Generating Company, the Generating Company, Commission, Commission, Renovation and Modernization, the Original Project Cost, Tariff, The Generating Company, Renovation and Modernisation, Commission, Normative Annual Plant Availability Factor, Commission, Commission, Commission, Generating Company, COD, the Generating Company, Regulations, Project, CERC, Tariff, Regulations, Commission, the Generating Company, Regulations, Commission, the Generating Company, Commission, Commission, Repeal and Savings, Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Generation Tariff, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Appropriate Commission, the Central Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the National Electricity Policy, the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, Determination of Tariff, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, The Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Commission, Appropriate Commission, the Central Government, the Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Government, Authority, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Commission, the Central Government, the State Government, the State Government, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Regulations, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Central, State, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, PTC, Judicial Review, Utter Pradesh Power Corporation Limited Vs, National Thermal Power Corporation of India Limited, such.&#8221, Hotel and Restaurant Association Vs, Star India Pvt. Ltd., the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Authority, Section 111of the Act, Commission, Commission, WB Electricity Regulatory Commission Vs, CERC, the High Court, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Tribunal, Commission, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, PTC India Ltd., CERC, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Hon’ble Court, Judicial Review, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Commission, Lordships, CERC, Commission, Lordships, PTC, the Mineral Concessional Rules, the Madras High Court, Supreme Court, State, Court, Emphasis, Commission, Commission, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Commission, the National Tariff Policy, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Court, Hindustan Paper Corporation Limited Vs, Kerala Forest Produce (, Fixation of Selling Price, Supreme Court, Commission, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Premium Granite, Commission, times, &#, Hindusthan Steels Ltd., Industrial Tribunal, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Tribunal, Judicial Review of Administrative Action,4th, Commission, Union of India, Authority, Court, State, the Government of the medical reimbursement, Government, Government, Authority, Foulke’s &#, Bennion on Statutory Interpretation, Fifth Edition, Court, Court, Court, CESC Ltd., Supreme Court, Tribunal, Commission, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Calcutta High Court, the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act

DATE: 2009, 2009, 4, 5, 08.02.1965 45 years, 31.03.1978 33 years 3, 10.09.2009 01 year 4, 21.03.1970 42 years 5, 20.09.1980 30 years 6, 27.02.1984 27 years 7, 17 yars 8, 23.11.2008 11 years 9, 28.08.2008 02 years 5, 2009, 30th April, 2009, annual, 2009, multi year, 2009-2010, 2011-12, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2010, 25 years, 2010, 26th May, 2010, the previous years, the earlier years, the coming years, the financial year 2009-2010, the financial year 2010-2011, the past few years, the past years, the year, 20.1.2010, FY 2009-10, 2008-09, 2003-04, the last 5 years, 2007-08, 2010-12, April 2009, FY 2009-10, many previous years, 2009, 2006, year, year, the previous years 9, 26.05.2010, 2010, 2003, 26th May, 2010, 2010, 2009, 2002, 2010, 1971, 1989, 1972, 2010, 1970, 2003, 26th May, 2010, 8of 2010, 2009, 2003, 2009, 58, 58, 59, 58, 2009, 2009, 2010, 1994, 1986, 398 5, 1969, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2010, 0189, 2007, 2009, 14, 2006, 1996, 2010, FY 10, older than 15 years, 2009, 2010, FY 2003, 2007, 2002, 2003-04, 2004-05, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2006-07, 2004-, 2005-06, 2006-07, 2010, 2009, preceding three months, June July, 61.99 3, 80.05 5, 13.79 25, July 2009, the Month May-09, these months, annual, annual, 2009, years, 2010, 2009, 58, 2009, 2003, 2003, 2003, 2010, 2003, 94, 2003, 1992, Annual, multi-year, 2006-07,, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2006-07, three months, more than 37 years, 11.10.2007, 18.03.2008, 15.07.2008, 2008-09, the preceding year, multi year, 22.02.2009, 20.03.2009, 07 of 2009, 25.03.2009, 15.04.2009, three months, six months, 2009, 08.05.2009, 02.06.2009, a month, 03.08.2009, 2009, multi year, 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 05.01.2010, 2009, 20.01.2010, 2010, 2010, 2009, 08 of 2010, 26.05.2010. 31, 2009, past years, 2009-10, 2008-09, the earlier years, the coming years, all the years of the years, 2009, 08-05-2009, 34, March 2012, 31.3.2009, 2005, 2003, 2003, many years, 2009, 1.04.2009, annual, the Year, 2009-10, every Year, 2009-12, the next financial Year, more than 25 Years, 1.4.2009, the Year 2009-10, 2005, 36, multi year, 1948, 1998, one year, one year, any financial year, seven days, 37, 38, 2009, 2009, 2006, 66, 2002, 2010, 1994, 48, 49, 50, 51, Rule 39, 19860, 1976, 43, 1994, 45, 46, 1990, 49, 1908, 2002, 1998

CARDINAL: 28, 2, 3, 6, 2, 3, No.8, No.9, 10, 4., 1, 1, 1.02.1965, 2, 01.04.2009, 2, 3, 11.09.1977 Unit 4, 5, 1, 06.10.1967, 2, 21.03.1968, 3, 14.05.1968, 4, 10.07.1968, 5, 6, 27.06.1979, 7, 8, 25.01.1983, 9, 2, 27.03.1994, 3, 28.2.1999, 4, 5, 1, 54, two, 6, 8, 7, 8, 8., 5, 500, 5, 62.5, 2.5 to 3, zero, 27.2.2009, Two, 5, 129, 2, 3, 10, about 388, 11, ten, 1, 1, 12, 8, 1, 8, 4, 2, 4, 2, 640, 8, 1, 735, 13, 57, 59, 59, 14, 15, 59, 57, 58, 59, three, 9, one, 1, 4, 603 3, 691 4, 3, 3, 4, 594, 328, 8), 217 9, 8, 3, 186, 11, 12, 15, 129, 1994Edition, 117, 285, 90, 716, 142, 16., 8, 500, 10 3.26, 2, two, one, 3.27, 210, 2, 200/210, 1, No.2, 17, 38, 1, 59.86 25.46, 2, 29.17 56.75, 69.16 43.30, 96.46, 87.50, 9, 8.60, 10, zero, zero, zero, zero, 18, 19, 8, 59, 8, 20, two, 21.Ours, 22, 1, 1, 3, 4, 23, 24, four, 25, 4, five, 121, 1997&#8221, 26, 93, 94, 121, 111, 27, 28, 149, 29, 30.05.2007, 30, 22.01.2008, 15.01.2008, 31.03.2008, 24.03.2008, 16.05.2008, 30.05.2008, 03.08.2009, 26.02.2009, 07, 11.11.2008, 11.12.2009, 20.03.2009, 30.04.2009, 19.05.2009, 9, 10, 27.08.2009, 28.08.2009, 54, 03.04, 25.01.2010, 16.02.2010, 54, 32, six, 26, 1, 1, 36, 33, 500, 28.08.2008, 14.0, 35, five, 59, 2, 2.1, 3., 3.1, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 16, 16.1, 19.01.2009, 18, 18.2, 18.3, 18.4, 18.1, 18.5, 5, 56.1, 57, 57.1, 58, 58.1, 59, 2005)&#8221, 59.2, 59.3, 59.4, 62, 1, two, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 63, 64, 1, 2, 3, one hundred and twenty days, 1, 4, 5, two, 6, four, four, 54, 74, 39, 6, 235, One, 56, 13, 753, 8, 40, 4, one, 78, 25, 49, 52, 41, 2, 691, 39, 39, 42, 9, 117, 44, 4, one, 47, 5, 328, 48, 217, 90, 115, 8, 102

WORK_OF_ART: Regulations, Thermal Power Generation, Draft Regulations, Regulations, Regulation, petitioner.&#8221, Renovation and Modernization, Regulation, Edition volume 1

PERCENT: 40%, 50%, 50%, 50%, 33%, approximately 20%, 62.64%, 62.57%, 50.56%, 62.55%, 62.92%, 61.50%, 69.60%, 63.22%, 63.71%, 45.54%, 61.77%, 65.37%, 72.20%, 64.34%, 63.45%, 80.18%, 63.71%, 79.35%, 65.37%, 83.58%, 63.45%, Monthly %, 50%, 5.72 %

ORDINAL: first, 3rd, fifth, first, fifth, 12th, Secondly, first, second

QUANTITY: 5.80 ml

PRODUCT: Appellant, No.1, HP Heaters, Birsingpur, Notification, 3 SCC 398, 1969)3 SCC 513, the S

MONEY: 8220;Allow, 8220;3.25, 1, 8220;24, 100.00, 8220;Mela&#8221, 8211, 8220;86, #8220;The Commission, #8220;The Commission, 8211;I, 8220;61, 8211;V, 8220;It, 8211

LOC: Madras, Licensing

EVENT: AIR 1966 SC, Regulation 33, Regulation 18.4, MW/Year

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, iii)apply, Indian

FAC: Sarni

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //