In the Matter of Mumbai International Airport Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai Vs. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, Mumbai and Another

Decided On : May-31-2011

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

LAW: the Electricity Act, The Electricity Act, the HT-II, the HT-II, Section 62(3, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 62, Section 62, the HT-II, the HT-II, the Electricity Act, the Competitive Bidding Process, the Appeal 106/08, the HT-II, the HT-II, the HT-II, Section 62(3, the HT-II, the HT-II, Section 62(3, the Electricity Act, Section 62(3, the Electricity Act, Section 62(3, the Electricity Act, the HT-II, Cal 63, Tariff Schedule, Section 62(3, Section 62(3, Section 62(3, Section 62(3, the Electricity Act, Section 62, section 62, the Electricity Act, the Article 14 of the Constitution of India, the Electricity Act, Indian Electricity Act, Electricity Supply Act, The Electricity Act, the Indian Electricity Act, the Electricity Supply Act 1948, The Electricity Act, The Indian Electricity Act, The Electricity Act, Section 49, Indian Electricity Act, the Electricity Supply Act, the Electricity Act, Section 62, the Electricity Act 2003, The Electricity Act, Tariff Schedule, Section 62(3, Section 62(3, the Electricity Act, Section 62(3, the Electricity Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 62(3, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 62(3, the HT-II

ORG: HONOURABLEMr, Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, State Commission, RIL, Appeal, the State Commission, RIL, Mumbai International Airport Private Limited, Maintenance, Development, Design, Construction, Upgradation, Modernization, Finance and Management of the Mumbai Airport, Appellant, RIL, RIL, RIL, the State Commission, MYT, the State Commission, MYT, MYT, The State Commission, LT-IX, Tribunal, Appeal, Tribunal, the State Commission, RIL, the State Commission, The State Commission, the Appellate Tribunal, the State Commission, Appeal, Tribunal, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, Appellant, Tribunal, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, RIL  (R-2, Tribunal, State Commission, Tribunal, RIL, ARR Petition, the State Commission, the Judgment of the Tribunal, the State Commission, State Commission, Appellant, the Tribunal in Appeal No, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the Tribunal in the Judgment, The Learned Counsel, the State Commission, Tribunal, The State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, RIL, Appellant, The State Commission, Tribunal, State Commission, DERC, Delhi Commission, State, the Appropriate Commission, The State Commission, The State Commission, The Learned Counsel, the State Commission, RIL, the State Commission, Tribunal, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Learned Counsel, the Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, RIL, this Tribunal in Appeal No, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the Appropriate Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Government on 04.02.2006, RIL, RIL, the State Commission, MYT, Appeal, Tribunal, Tribunal, LT-IX, RIL, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Appellant, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Appellant, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, RIL, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, RIL, ARR Petition, ARR, RIL, Appellant, the State Commission, the Tribunal in the Judgment, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the ARR Petition, RIL, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, RIL, Tata Power, RIL, the Bombay High Court, RIL, RIL, Tata Power, the State Commission, RIL, Tata, RIL, Tata, RIL, RIL, the Appellant for Terminal, Appellant, the High Court, the High Court, the State Commission, The High Court, SLP, the Supreme Court, the Hon’ble, Supreme Court, RIL, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the State Commission, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the State Commission, Commission, Commission, IA 183 of 2009, Commission, Commission.&#8221, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, possible.&#8221, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellant, the High Court, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the High Court, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Learned Counsel, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellant, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Remand, the Learned Counsel, the State Commission, the Distribution Company, Remand, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Distribution Company, the State Commission, Tribunal, the Learned Counsel, the State Commission, Appeal, MERC, MERC, the Essential Services Maintenance Act, MERC, the Essential Service Maintenance Act, scale.&#8221, MERC, Appellant, MERC, Government of India, Airport Authority of India, the Government of India, the Airport Authority of India, MERC, MERC, Appellant, Appellant, the Essential Services Maintenance Act, Appellant, Appellant, the State Commission, the Government of India, the Airport Authority of India, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Commission, Commission, Tribunal, Kashi Vishwanath Steel Ltd., Uttaranchal Electricity Regulatory Commission, this Tribunal on 02.06.2006, The Uttaranchal Electricity Regulatory Commission, consumers.&#8221, Kashi Vishwanath Steel Ltd., the National Tariff Policy, Commission, the National Tariff Policy, Commission, Commission, consumers.&#8221, Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, The State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, National Tariff Policy, the State Commission, The State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, RIL, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Anandhibai, CCE, Income Tax, Allahabad, AIR 2004 Calcutta, U.P., AIR, Union of India(2001 10 SCC 424, Union of India, Tirupati Balaji Developers Private Limited, State of Bihar, C.V. Rajendran, AP, Dorayya, Income Tax, Allahabad, the Superior Court to Subordinate Court, Court, the Superior Court, Court, the Superior Court, Court, Limited Remand Order, Court, the Order of Remand, Superior Court, Court, the Superior Court, the Superior Court, the Superior Court, the Superior Court, Court, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Appellant, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, ATE, Commission, ATE, Commission, MIAI, Commission, MERC, Commission, RInfra, Commission, the State/Central Government, Commission, Commission, Commission, EA, Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, the State Commission, the Respondent Commission, Tribunal, the Respondent Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellant, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellant, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the Tribunal on the basis of, the State Commission, Determination of Tariff &#, Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, the Appropriate Commission, The Learned Counsel, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Learned Counsel, Commission, the Distribution Company, Legislature, Commission, Commission, the Learned Commission, the Learned Counsel, State, U.P., M.S. Jasra and Others, Labour, Burhanpur Tapti Mills and Others, the Learned Counsel, expression &, the Learned Counsel, Appellant, Appropriate Commission, Board, Board, Board, Board, State, Board, Board, Railway Stations, Railway Station, Small &#, Medium &#, Large &, States/Union Territories, Group Housing Societies, the State Commission, Commission, MERC, Commission, industrial.&#8221, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, the word &, the State Commission, the Sate Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, Appellant, Tribunal, Udyog Nagar Factory Owner Association, BSES Rajdhani Power Limited, Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, Commission, Railway, DMRC, the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, RIL, the State Commission, the State Commission, HT-Public and Government, RIL, DERC, the Delhi International Airport, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, the State Commission, Tribunal, Tribunal, the State Commission, Tribunal, the State Commission, The State Commission, the State Commission, The State Commission, Appellant, Tribunal, The State Commission, the State Commission, the State Commission

PERSON: M. KARPAGA VINAYAGAM, Appellant, Appellant, Airport, Mohan Lal, Bidya Devi, K.P. Dwivedi, Tate, Muneswar, Jagat Mohini Das, Anr, Bahadur Singh, Singh Badal, Anr, Harmusji Wadia, V. Mohmmed Kinhi, Kaluram, Mahtab Bai, Balaswaraswami, Haribilas, Bidya Devi, Remand Order, Petitioner, Canara Bank, Airport, Distribution Licensee, Distribution Licensee, Petitioner, Distribution Licensee, Remand Order, Remand Order

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 24.11.2009, 3., 5, 6., 8, 9, 10, 106/08, 11, 12, 30.04.2009, 13, 26.02.2009, 26.02.2009, 24.11.2009, 26.02.2009, 26.02.2009, 15, 16, 3, 17, two, 106/08, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 106/08, 23, 17.04.2009, 24, 30.04.2009, 25, 26, 26.02.2009, 27, 26.02.2009, 28, 29, 30, 20.10.2009, 01.11.2009, 1854/09, 26.02.2009, 3, 30.04.2009, 26.02.2009, 19.05.2009, 14.05.2009, 33, 26.02.2009, 34, 26.02.2009, 30.04.2009, 35, one, 19.05.2009, two, 36, 26.02.2009, 30.04.2009, 18.11.2009, 24.11.2009, 26.02.2009, 38, 26.02.2009, 39, 40, 41, 42., 106/08, 43., 1968.&#8221, tariff.&#8221, 45, 26.02.2009, 26.02.2009.in, 5.90, 5.4, 125, 10.92, 5, only 10.22%.&#8221, three, 0 to, 21, 50, 50, 20, 20, 21, 50, 50, 27.01.2009, 124, 21, 22, 17, two, 2, 2, 2, 1, 26.02.2009, 09, two, one, 1, 48, 3, 50, 51., 26.02.2009, 1, 1, 2, 7, 352, 3, 4, 12, 572, 5, 368, 6, 1, 8), 1, 9, 5, 1, 10, 3, 11, 7, 447, 12, 1959, 161, 13, 250, 14, 90, 15, 26.02.2009, 24.11.2009, 57, 1, 2003.&#8221, 59, 26.02.2009, 60, 61., 62, 3, 63, one, 3, 6, 590, 2, 484, 484, 64, 3, 66, 67, 3, 3, 1, 23(4, 3, 1, 2, 3, 4, 69, One, 3, one, 3, 3, 4, 72, 73, 74, 75, 79, 81, 28.05.2009, 82, 84, 85, 26.02.2009, 26.02.2009, 88

FAC: Mumbai International Airport, the Appellant herein, Mumbai Airport, the Mumbai Airport, Mumbai Airport, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, Appellant, R-2, the Delhi International Airport Limited, R-2, the Mumbai Airport, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, Appellant, R-2, R-2, R-2, R-2, the Mumbai Airport, Appellant, the Mumbai Airport, the Appellant per se, Mumbai Airport, Mumbai International Airport, Appellant, R-2, Remand, Remand, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, the Appellant (Petitioner, R-2, R-2, Remand, Remand, Remand

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second, first, second, 2nd

LOC: the Appellant for FY 2008-09, Malls, Open Remand, Respondent, Malls, Malls, Remand, Respondent, Remand

DATE: 04.04.2006, 2007-08, 2009-10, 24.04.2007, 19.12.2007, 2003, 19.12.2007, the FY-2008-09, 04.06.2008, 26.02.2009, 04.06.2008, 8 weeks, 26.02.2009, 17.03.2009, 8 weeks, 8 weeks, 26.02.2009, FY-2009-10, 26.02.2009, 15.06.2009, FY-2009-10, FY-2008-09, 15.06.2009, the year 2009-10, 144/09, 24.11.2009, 195/09, 14, 26.02.2009, 26.02.2009, 26.02.2009, 2003, 23.11.2009, 2003, 2003, 26.02.2009, 2003, 24.04.2007, 2007-08, 2009-10, 19.12.2007, 2008-09, 04.06.2008, 04.06.2008, 26.02.2009, 8 weeks, 26.02.2009, 17.03.2009, 25.03.2009, 07.04.2009, 8 weeks, 06.05.2009, 19.05.2009, 2008-09, 26.02.2009, FY-2009-10, 2008-09, 15.06.2009, 26.02.2009, 19.05.2009, 2008-09, 15.06.2009, 26.02.2009, 15.06.2009, 144/09, August 2009, 26.02.2009, 1854 of 2009, 15.10.2009, monthly, 07.11.2009, 18.11.2009, 1 week, 2008-09, 21.11.2009, 24.11.2009, the very same day, 24.11.2009, 31, 26.02.2009, 8 weeks, 8 weeks, the 8 weeks, 19.05.2009, 8 weeks, 2008-09, 26.02.2009, 32, 26.02.2009, 19.05.2009, the next 8 weeks.&#8221, 8 weeks, 17.03.2009, Almost 8 weeks, 19.05.2009, 26th February, 2009, the next 8 weeks, 19,.05.2009, the next year, 2009-10, 15.06.2009, August, 2009, 2008-09, one week, 37, 19.05.2009, August, 2009, 3 months, 24.11.2009, 26.02.2009, 04.06.2008, 24.11.2009, 2008-09, 2003, 26.02.2009, 1968, 44, 2003, 1968, 2003, 46, the previous year, the next eight weeks, 47, 49, 52, 1971, 2007, 63, 2003, 1952, 2006, 3670, 2007, 2004, 2004, 2002, 1972, 54, 55, 56, the year, the year, 2005, 2003, 58, 24.11.2009, 26.02.2009, 2003, 1998, 1992, 1964(7, 2003, 2003, 2003, 1910, 2003, 62, 1910, 1948, 2003, 1910, 2003, 70, 71, 2003, 2005, 2003, 76, 80, 26.02.2009, 86, 87

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Judgment, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Judgment, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Judgment, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Judgment, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Remand, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, 8220;However, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

PERCENT: 25%, 43.88%, nearly 85%, 50%, about 43%, about 85%, 84%, approximately 43%, only 9.7%, 25%

EVENT: Multi Year Tariff, LT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, the FY-2008-09, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, LT-II, HT-II, HT-II, the HT-II, HT-II, the HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, LT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, Petitioner.&#8221, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT-II, HT Commercial II

WORK_OF_ART: Appellant, Open Remand

GPE: Counsels, Bombay, Mumbai, Airport, kW, kW, kW, kW, kW, kW, Singh, Port, Mumbai, India

MONEY: 8220;We, 8220;In, 8220;(I, 8220;(J, 8220;(L, 8220;(M, 8220;18, 8220;19, 8220;20, 8220;12, 8220;24, 8220;26, 8220;As, 8220;As, 8220;As, 8216;Industrial&#8217, 8220;It, 8220;It, 8217;non, 8220;As, 8220;In, 8220;shall&#8221, 8220;may&#8221, 8220;shall&#8221, 8220;may&#8221, 8220;shall&#8221, 8220;may&#8221, 8220;shall&#8221, 8220;may&#8221, 8220;may&#8221, #8220;The Appropriate Commission, 8220;26, 8220;may&#8221, 8220;may&#8221, 8220;purpose&#8221, 8220;Thus

NORP: Malls

QUANTITY: 20 kW

TIME: The hours