Skip to content

St. Louis, Brownsville and Mexico Ry. Co. Vs. Taylor - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Nov-17-1924

Court: US Supreme Court

LAW: the Carmack Amendment

GPE: St. Louis, U.S., Delaware, Missouri, Texas, Michigan, Atchison, Galveston

ORG: Brownsville & Mexico Ry, U.S. Supreme Court, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Company, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF, Syllabus, supreme court, Court, Congress, Mo. 474, the Supreme Court, The American Fruit Growers, Inc., The Brownsville Company, Brownsville, U.S. 696, Detroit &amp, Railroad Commission, Farmers' Cooperative Equity Co., Topeka & Santa Fe, Wells, Railway Co., Big Vein Coal Co. v. Read, Compare Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co., Minneapolis &amp, St. Louis R. Co., New Orleans & Northeastern R. Co. v. Harris, Yazoo & Mississippi Valley R. Co., Atkins v. Disintegrating Co.

PERSON: Taylor, Jurisdiction, Mackinac Ry, Stadelman, Davis, Wallace, Claflin, Houseman, Mullins, Clark v. Wells

DATE: 1924, October 17, 1924, November 17, 1924, June 29, 1906, c. 3591, 12, 223 U. S. 1, 239 U. S. 199

CARDINAL: 266, 89, 1, 2, 3, 4, 298, 206, three, 263, two, One, 11, 34, 584 595, 223, 241, 211, one, 18, 272

PERCENT: 246 U. S. 544, 103 U. S. 794, 93 U. S. 130, 247 U. S. 367

EVENT: Carmack Amendment

ORDINAL: first

LOC: Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //