Manjeet Sharma and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Decided On : May-28-2012

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

LAW: Section 17, Article 14 of Constitution of India, Article 14, Constitution, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: Sudhir Kumar, Aligarh, Aligarh, Aligarh, Presses, Diwakar Vs, Binder, Nirman Bhavan, Diwakar Vs, Shri Diwakar, Binder, Shri Diwakar, Shri Diwakar, Kumar Sharma, Shri Diwakar, Binder, Chakradhar 2002, Law, O. Chakradhar, Krishna Yadav, Artist Retoucher, Anr, Jagjit Singh, Anr, Jaipur v. Daulat Mal Jain, Kumar Mann, Chandigarh, Anr, Kameshwar Prasad Singh, Anr, Gaurav Ashwin Jain, Jagjit Singh's, Chandigarh, Chandigarh, Prakash Rani, Jagjit Singh, Gaurav Ashwin Jain, Bench, Jagjit Singh's, Gursharan Singh's, Presses, Delhi Orders, WP(C, Vir Singh, A.K. Sharma, Aligarh, Delhi Orders, WP(C, Vir Singh, A.K. Sharma, GIP Aligarh, Aligarh, Annexure A-1, Quash, Nilokheri, Aligarh, Shri Ajay Maken, Nilokheri Presses, Aligarh, Chakradhar 2002, Roy, Nilokheri, Ring Road, Koratty, Rashtrapati Bhawan, Rashtrapati Bhawan, Rashtrapati Bhawan, Rashtrapati Bhawan, Shri R.C. Mishra, Aligarh, Press Aligarh, O. Chakradhar, Damocles, Aligarh

CARDINAL: 1, 57, 1, 2, 2. &nbsp, 18, 23.01.2008, 27.03.2008, 46, 18.04.2008, 47, 18.04.2008, 48, 18.04.2008, 49, 18.04.2008, 50, 18.04.2008, 51, 52, 3. &nbsp, 4. &nbsp, 5., 6. &nbsp, 2412/2009cannot, 7. &nbsp, one, 4.&nbsp, 18, 8. &nbsp, 20.10.2010, 1, 5. &nbsp, 19.1.2011, 5.2&nbsp, 18, 25.2.2009, 9. &nbsp, one, 10.&nbsp, 22.03.2011, 11.&nbsp, 12.&nbsp, 3, 1, 14, 15, 16, 17.&nbsp, three, 5825/2011, 22.11.2011, 07.03.2012, 3, 19, II, 1986)II, 1, 54, 20.&nbsp, 21, 23, 5, 16, 1, 126, 1, 1, 1, 18-3-1991, 69, 8), one, one, 77, two, 24, 25, 18.11.2011, 26, 27, 28.&nbsp, three, three, 13, 29.&nbsp, 14, 2012.&#8221, 30.&nbsp, 18.4.2011, 31, 2, 3., 32.&nbsp, 18.4.2011, 2, 3., 4., 33.&nbsp, 57, 57, 07.03.2012, 35.&nbsp, two, 36.&nbsp, 57, one, 37.&nbsp, 38.&nbsp, 33, 34, six, 154, 3, 146, 39.&nbsp, 19.01.11, 30, 7.3.12, 2. &nbsp, 1.4.2011, 3. &nbsp, 4. &nbsp, 40.&nbsp, 6, 5, 6, 6, 41.&nbsp, 42.&nbsp, 30.11.2010, 42, 4, 14, 43.&nbsp, 14, 44.&nbsp, 07.03.2012, 57, 57, one, two, 45.&nbsp, 57, 57, 14, 46.&nbsp, 14, 47.&nbsp, 16, 48.&nbsp, three, 49.&nbsp, 50, 17.07.2012

GPE: OA, New Delhi, Delhi, OA, Presses, Presses, OA, New Delhi, OA, OA, CP, OA, OA, OA, OA, Delhi, Shankarsan Dash v. Union of India, Upendra, Singh, Singh, Delhi, Delhi, WP, Delhi, Delhi, WP, Harish, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, OA, Delhi, O.A., Restrain, India, Mayapuri, Faridabad, Faridabad, Mayapuri, Govt, Delhi, Dilbagh, WP, U.D., Delhi, Faridabad, Delhi, Delhi, India, Govt, India, Delhi, Delhi, OA, Delhi

LOC: Govt, Reliefs, Govt, Apex

ORG: India Press, Tribunal, India Press, Tribunal, Presses of the Union of India, India Press, Annexures A-11 and A-12, Tribunal, the Respondent Union of India, Group &, Tribunal, OA No.2412/2009, Group &, Directorate of Printing,, Ministry of Urban Development, Tribunal, the respondents:- &#, OA, Contempt Petition No.494/2010, the Government of India that Shri A K Sharma, OA No, Group, Tribunal, this Tribunal in Contempt Petition, Bench, Contempt Petition, MA No.1580/2010, Tribunal, Bench, order:- &#, Tribunal, Tribunal, Shri Vijay, India Press, inter alia, the Administrative Ministry i.e Urban Development, OBC, Tribunal, the Contempt of Courts, Bench, Union of India, Applicant, Applicant, Applicant, Respondents, the Ministry of Urban Development, Central Administrative Tribunals, the Honble Supreme Court, Union of India Vs, the Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development, Ministry of Law, Bench, OA No.2856/2010, Respondents, Respondents, Central Pay Commission, Group, Respondents, Respondents, Union of India, the Supreme Court, AIR 1991, Union of India, the Apex Court, Subordinate Selection Board, the Supreme Court, CBI, LLJ 468 SC Kashi, Union of India, Department, the High Court, Court, Government, CVO, Press, CVO, CVO, State of Bihar, Court, The High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Chandigarh Administration, Jaipur Development Authority, Union of India, Railway Board, Ors, AIR 1996 SC 2890, New Delhi Municipal Committee, State, Haryana v. Ram, Faridabad CT Scan Centre, D.G. Health Services, SC, AIR 1999, SC, State of Bihar and Ors, AIR 2000, Union of India, Anr, International Trading Co., Anr, AIR 2003, Directorate of Film Festivals and Ors, AIR 2007, Estate, the High Court, Estate, Government, Estate, the High Court, Smt, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Authority, Authority, the High Court, Authority, the High Court, Authority, the High Court, principles.&#8221, Directorate of Film Festivals and Ors, the High Court, The High Court, CVO, Government, CVO, the Ministry of Law, the Ministry of Law, CVO, CVO, Emphasis, Delhi High Court, Tribunal, the Union of India and Others, Tribunal, CM, High Court, Government, CVO, Court, CVO, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Delhi High Court, No.5962/2011, WP, CAT, S/Shri Dharam, Government of India Press, Press, High Court, Court, Directorate, Delhi High Court, No.5962/2011, WP, CAT, S/Shri Dharam, O.M., the Judgment of the High Court, Government of India Press, Press, High Court, Court, Directorate, Respondents, Delhi High Court, Delhi High Court, Tribunal, CVO, Emphasis, the Union of India, Delhi High Court, and &, CVO, Tribunal, Delhi High Court, File No, CVO, Coimbatore, CVO, Coimbatore Presses, Minto Road Press, MOS, UD, the Directorate of Printing, India Press, ASandCVO, Apex Court, Union of India, Ministry of Urban Development, MOS, UD, ASandCVO, the High Court, HOD, HCD, CVO, HCD, HCD, CAT, CVO, GOI Presses, Aligarh, Coimbatore, Santragachi, UD, CVO, GOI Presses, Santragachi, CVO, GOI Presses, Santragachi, UD, Government of India, the High Court, GOI Presses, the Government of India, the GOI Presses, Santragachi, CVO, CVO, the Investigation Report, CVO, Ministry of Urban Development, India Press, Delhi High Court, Original, CVO, Tribunal, Delhi High Court, Union of India, Delhi High Court, CVO, Delhi High Court, CVO, Court, Tribunal, CVO, CVO, the Government of India Press, CVO, CVO, CVO, CVO

WORK_OF_ART: the Lucknow Bench, Subhaiah and Ors, Style (Dress Land, Presses, Investigation Report

PRODUCT: Respondent No.3, Respondent No.4, A-10, 801, 3678, Respondent No.4

DATE: the very first date, the year 2007, 10-16.11.2007, 42 and, 43, January 2008, 17.04.2008, 07.12.2009, 2412/2009, more than one year, 7.12.2009, two weeks, two months, two months, the next date, 04.05.2010, 27.04.2010, 10.08.2010, 7.12.2009, 7.12.2009, the next day, March, 2008, 1992, 13.12.2010, 3rd April, 2008, 1993, 154 13.&nbsp, December 2008, four weeks, 2002, a past few years, 1986, 1991, the year 2010, 22, 13.12.2010, April, 2008, 2009, 1995, 1997, 1996, 1154, 1997, 1997, 2306, 1640, Sector 31A, one month, 07.03.2012, 4745/2011, 5978/2012, 5987/2012, 7th March, 2012, 7th March, 4745/2011, 34.&nbsp, one month, page-32, 1993(1, 09.04.2012 as follows:- &#, 2007, 2008, 2007-2008, today, 14.05.2012, 07.03.2012, days, the last four years, February, 2008, 14.05.2012

MONEY: 8216;D&#8217, 8216;D&#8217, 8220;As, 8220;, 8216;as, 8220;It, 8220;The, 8220;67, 14.05.2012:- &, 8220;In, 8216;Y&#8217, #8216;X’:- &, 8220;X, 8220;a)&nbsp, 8220;The

EVENT: the OA No.1194/2009, SC 1612

FAC: 04.05.2010, OA No.2880/2010, Minto Road, Temple Street, Temple Street, Temple Street, Temple Street

QUANTITY: 4.2 x x x x x, 5.1 x x x x, 338 square yards

ORDINAL: first, Sixth, second, first, first, Honble, Honble

PERCENT: 25%, 5%