Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

E. Mohammad Ajmal Vs. Union of India, Represented by the General Manager, Southern Railway, Headquarters Office, Park Town P.O., Chennai and Others

Decided On : Feb-28-2012

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

LAW: Article 311 of the Constitution of India, Article 311, Rule 9, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act

PERSON: K. GEORGE JOSEPH, Loco Pilot, Railways, Loco Pilot, Loco Pilot, Pay Band, T.C. Govindaswamy, P.K. Radhika, S.S. Makapur, Gangadhar

ORG: ADMINISTRATIVE, the Trivandrum Division, Railway Services, The Disciplinary Authority, Railway, Tribunal, xxxxx xxxxxxx, a Civil Service of the Union, an All India Service, a Civil Service, State, State, the Railway Rules, the Public Servants (Inquiries, Railway, Authority, Railway, Court, Court, Court, Court, AIR 1969, SC, Central Bank of India Limited, Khardah Co. Ltd., Court, Court, the State of Mysore, Court, M/s. Kesoram Cotton Mills Ltd., Gangadhar and Others(1, New Prakash Transport Co., New Suwarna Transport Co., the Apex Court, Tribunal

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 3(1)(ii, 3., 4., 5, 6., 6, 2, 1, 6, 2, 8., 10, 10, 2, 9, 10, 11, 8

GPE: O.A., O.A., O.A., O.A., O.A., O.A., O.A., O.A., Clauses, Apex, Workmen, OA, O.A., O.A.

DATE: 52 days, 1966, 5 years, 3 years, 1850, a period of, six months, 6 months

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India

PRODUCT: Constitutional

ORDINAL: First

FAC: Prakash Chand Jain

TIME: a few minutes

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //