Semantic Analysis by spaCy
E. Mohammad Ajmal Vs. Union of India, Represented by the General Manager, Southern Railway, Headquarters Office, Park Town P.O., Chennai and Others
Decided On : Feb-28-2012
Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
LAW: Article 311 of the Constitution of India, Article 311, Rule 9, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act
PERSON: K. GEORGE JOSEPH, Loco Pilot, Railways, Loco Pilot, Loco Pilot, Pay Band, T.C. Govindaswamy, P.K. Radhika, S.S. Makapur, Gangadhar
ORG: ADMINISTRATIVE, the Trivandrum Division, Railway Services, The Disciplinary Authority, Railway, Tribunal, xxxxx xxxxxxx, a Civil Service of the Union, an All India Service, a Civil Service, State, State, the Railway Rules, the Public Servants (Inquiries, Railway, Authority, Railway, Court, Court, Court, Court, AIR 1969, SC, Central Bank of India Limited, Khardah Co. Ltd., Court, Court, the State of Mysore, Court, M/s. Kesoram Cotton Mills Ltd., Gangadhar and Others(1, New Prakash Transport Co., New Suwarna Transport Co., the Apex Court, Tribunal
CARDINAL: 1, 2., 3(1)(ii, 3., 4., 5, 6., 6, 2, 1, 6, 2, 8., 10, 10, 2, 9, 10, 11, 8
GPE: O.A., O.A., O.A., O.A., O.A., O.A., O.A., O.A., Clauses, Apex, Workmen, OA, O.A., O.A.
DATE: 52 days, 1966, 5 years, 3 years, 1850, a period of, six months, 6 months
WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India
PRODUCT: Constitutional
ORDINAL: First
FAC: Prakash Chand Jain
TIME: a few minutes