Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Budhuram Vs. State of Chhattisgarh

Decided On : Sep-20-2012

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 302 IPC, PW 1, the Investigating Officer

DATE: J1, 1.8.1998, 2.8.1998, PW 1, July 1986, PW 3, PW 4, PW 4, PW 5, PW 2, 13.8.1998

ORG: the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bandhanram, the Police Station at, PW 4 (Ranjit Ekka, the High Court, Amicus Curiae, State, Bandhanram, the High Court

PERSON: Shantibai, Kumar, Atul Jha, Vedprakash Patel, Shantibai, Tangi, Tangi

TIME: the next morning, 9.00 PM

EVENT: PW 2, PW 5, PW 2, PW 5, PW 2, PW 2, PW 5, PW 5, PW 3, PW 3, PW 2, PW 5, PW 5, PW 5, PW 2, PW 4, PW 4, PW 1

GPE: Ramchandra, the Dhawraghat Nala, Kamleshwarpur, Shantibai, Baburam, the Dhawraghat Nala, the Dhawraghat Nala, Shantibai, Shantibai, the Dhawraghat Nala, the Dhawraghat Nala, the Dhawraghat Nala, the Dhawraghat Nala, Dhawraghat Nala, the Dhawraghat Nala

WORK_OF_ART: PW 2 and PW 5, PW 2

PRODUCT: PW 2, PW 2, PW 2, PW 2, PW 2, PW 2, PW 2

CARDINAL: two, one, only one

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //