Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Budhuram Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Decided On : Sep-20-2012
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 302 IPC, PW 1, the Investigating Officer
DATE: J1, 1.8.1998, 2.8.1998, PW 1, July 1986, PW 3, PW 4, PW 4, PW 5, PW 2, 13.8.1998
ORG: the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bandhanram, the Police Station at, PW 4 (Ranjit Ekka, the High Court, Amicus Curiae, State, Bandhanram, the High Court
PERSON: Shantibai, Kumar, Atul Jha, Vedprakash Patel, Shantibai, Tangi, Tangi
TIME: the next morning, 9.00 PM
EVENT: PW 2, PW 5, PW 2, PW 5, PW 2, PW 2, PW 5, PW 5, PW 3, PW 3, PW 2, PW 5, PW 5, PW 5, PW 2, PW 4, PW 4, PW 1
GPE: Ramchandra, the Dhawraghat Nala, Kamleshwarpur, Shantibai, Baburam, the Dhawraghat Nala, the Dhawraghat Nala, Shantibai, Shantibai, the Dhawraghat Nala, the Dhawraghat Nala, the Dhawraghat Nala, the Dhawraghat Nala, Dhawraghat Nala, the Dhawraghat Nala
WORK_OF_ART: PW 2 and PW 5, PW 2
PRODUCT: PW 2, PW 2, PW 2, PW 2, PW 2, PW 2, PW 2
CARDINAL: two, one, only one
ORDINAL: first