Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dr. Sunil Clifford Daniel Vs. State of Punjab

Decided On : Sep-14-2012

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Section 201 IPC, Section 28, Section 364, Section 311, the Canteen Contractor Joshi, Section 313 Cr, the Investigating Officer, Section 313 Cr, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Section 162(1, Section 162(1, Section 162(1, Section 27, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 162(2, Section 27, the Evidence Act, the Investigating Officer, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 Cr

PERSON: B.S. CHAUHAN, Haryana, Ludhiana, RI, Loyalla Shagoufta, Ludhiana, Ludhiana, B. Pawar, B. Pawar, Loyalla Shagoufta, Victoria Rani, Victoria Rani, Ludhiana, Victoria Rani, Namrata Saran, B. Pawar, No.2010, Rana, B. Pawar, Vir Rajinder Pal, Ludhiana, Victoria Rani, H. Immediately, Vir Rajinder Pal, B. Pawar, U.S. Sooch, Pauli, Head Constable, Ludhiana, B. Pawar, Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, Jayant K. Sud, Law, Pauli, U.S. Sooch, Loyalla Shagoufta, B. Pawar, B. Pawar, Victoria Rani, Victoria Rani, Sarabjit Singh, Anil Kumar, Cook, Joginder Singh, Kirpal Dev Singh, Sunil, Victoria Rani, Rana, Vir Rajinder Pal, Loyalla Shagoufta, Lalton Kalan, Randhir Singh, B. Pawar, Vir Rajinder Pal, Ludhiana, B. Pawar, Pauli, Pauli, Loyalla Shagoufta, Pauli, Loyalla Shagoufta, Loyalla Shagoufta, Pauli, Loyalla Shagoufta, appellant.15, B. Pawar, Shagoufta, Pauli, Lalton Kalan, Pauli, Yogesh, Yogesh, Sarabjit Singh, Sharad Birdhichand Sarda, and(5, B. Pawar, Matru, Mahender Singh Dahiya, Yusuf v. State, Subedar Tewari v. State, Chandra Bahri, Jackaran Singh v. State of, Teja Ram, Venkateswara Rao v. State, Jackaran Singh, Pauli, Gura Singh v. State, Prapanna Tripathi, Teja Ram, Kartalla v. State, Singh v. State of Punjab, John Pandian v. State, Tamil Nadu, Randhir Singh Jat, Anr, Singh Jat, I.O., Khan, Anr, S. Sardar Ali &, Loyalla Shagoufta, Victoria Rani, B. Pawar, B. Pawar, Victoria Rani, Rana, Namrata Saran, B. Pawar, Vir Rajinder Pal, Victoria Rani, Vir Rajinder Pal, Pauli, Joginder Singh, Randhir Singh, U.S. Sooch, B. Pawar, Kirpal Dev Singh, Joshi, Lalton Kalan, Pauli, Pauli

NORP: J.1, D.

CARDINAL: 1.4.2009, 399, 21.8.2000, 201, 9.3.1996, 6.3.1996, 8.3.1996, 8.3.1996, 10.3.1996, one, 9.3.1996, 9.3.1996, one, about 20, three, one, one, one, one, 15, two, 21.8.2000, 9&rdquo, 3.4&rdquo, 2, 2, 2&rdquo, 9.3.1996, 8.3.1996, 9.3.1996, 9.3.1996, 10.3.1996, one, one, one, one, 9.3.1996, 1&frac12, 9.3.1996, 9.3.1996, 3, 109, one, two, two, one, two, 51, 14, 129, two, one, two, 1, 652, One, 2, 1225).38, 1, 6.3.1996, 7.3.1996, 10.3.1996.(ii, 9.3.1996, 10.3.1996, sealed.(vi, one, one, one, 9.3.1996

ORG: the High Court of Punjab, the Christian Medical College, Hospital Ludhiana, the Court of the District Judge, the Medical Superintendent, Smt, District Yamunanagar, Jagadhari, I.O.G., SHO, Police Station, the Police Chowki, Lalton Kalan, Medical Board, FSL, Ashok Kumar, the Forensic Department, FSL, FSL, Criminal Appeal, the High Court, the State of Punjab, the Board of Doctors, abrasion ½ ” x ½&rdquo, Abrasion ¾&rdquo, x ½&rdquo, FIR, Security Guard, PW.12, CMC Hospital, CMC, Lalton Kalan, CMC Hospital, SHO, Police Station, CMC, FSL, the Medical Superintendent of the Hospital, the Medical Superintendent of the Hospital, FSL, The High Court, Divorce Petition, the Junior Doctor’s Hospital, Security Guard, Operation Theatre, the Operation Theatre, AIR 1984 SC 1622, Court, State, Court, U.P., AIR 1971, State, CBI, AIR 2011 SC 2283).In, U.P. &amp, AIR 1989, SC, Court, AIR 1995 SC, Court, State, AIR 1999, Court, Court, Andhra Pradesh, AIR 2003 SC 2846, Court, Court, FSL, dis-integrated.29, Court, AIR 2001, SC, Court, Court, Prabhu Babaji Navie, AIR 1956, SC, U.P., AIR 1963, Court, AIR 2008, the Forensic Science Laboratory Report/Serologist Report, Criminal Appeal No, Inspector of Police, Court, FSL, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, Madhya Pradesh, The Transport, A.P., Hyderabad &, AIR 1983 SC, State, Maharashtra v. Suresh, FIR, SHO, the Police Chowki, Lalton Kalan, SHO, PW.12, FSL, Lalton Kalan

DATE: 2000, 1860, a period of 3 months, two years, 2 months, 29.10.1993, June 1994.B., 20.2.1996, 1954, that day, 10.3.1996, 16 of 1996, 11.3.1996, 11.3.1996, 11.3.1996, 11.3.1996, 13.3.1996, 1973, 2000, 1.4.2009.Hence, two days, 11.3.1996, 7.3.1996, 2010, 11.3.1996, 13.3.1996, 10.3.1996, 5653, 11.3.1996, 2010, 11.3.1996, 1050, 2011, 1994, 2345, 1776, 1872, 1184, 20.7.2012, 2010, 2001, 2010, 2000, 11.3.1996, 9.3.1996.On the same day, 12.3.1996, 11.3.1996, 11.3.1996, one and a half hours

PRODUCT: Rs.2,000/-, 733, 330

GPE: Rs.1,000/-, Jagadhari, Piara, Hawaii, Old Jail, Hawaii, AAG, Jagadhari, Jagadhari, Ludhiana, PW.8, Ludhiana, Jagadhari, Jagadhari, Jagadhari, Piara, Singh, Ludhiana, Ludhiana, P.C., Hawaii, P.C., Singh, West Bengal, proof.21, Suresh, Bihar, Rajasthan v., P.C., P.C., Golakonda, Rajasthan, Bombay, Sattatiya, significance.32, Govt, Delhi v. Sunil &, Panch, P.C., Jagadhari, Ludhiana, Hawaii, P.C., PW.8, Jagadhari, Jagadhari

LOC: the District Judge

ORDINAL: first, second, first, Firstly

TIME: 9.40 p.m., 9.00 a.m., 5.00 p.m., 10.00 a.m., 10.00 a.m., 11.30 a.m., 6.00 p.m., 1½ hours, hours, 6.00 p.m.

EVENT: the Operation Threatre, SC 74

WORK_OF_ART: Panchnama and Recovery Panchnama

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //