Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

N.NameethA. Vs. the Pondicherry University and ors.

Decided On : Jul-04-2012

Court : Chennai

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Pondicherry University Act, Pondicherry University Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 10A, Section 22, the Pondicherry University Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

DATE: 13769, 13770, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 2012, 12988 of 2012, 13770 of 2012, 30.05.2012, 2002, 09.04.2012, nine years, December, 2011, 2002-2003, 9 years, December, 2011, December, 2012, 2002-2003, 4-1/2 year, 5 year, May 2010, 2 years, 2009, Nov 2009, one more year, May / June and, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, nine years, 4-1/2 years, 17.12.2009, May, 2011, December, 2011, 2012, the academic year 2001-2002, the academic year 2001-2002, First year, the year 2001-2002, 09.08.2002, the year 2001-2002, 2012, the first year, November, 2002, nine years, December, 2010, May, 2006, May, 2006, May, 2007, May, 2007, November, 2007, may, 2008, May 2008, November, 2008, nine years, 3rd year, 2012, First year, November, 2002, nine years, December, 2010, the year 2002-2003, 2012, the First year, November, 2002, nine years, December, 2010, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, December 2011, 2012, 4-1/2 years, 2006, 2011, 15957 of 2012, 25.06.2012, 2002-2003, April, 2002, the academic year 2001-2002, year 2001-2002, 20.1.2003, the academic year 2002-2003, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 2002-2003, about the year, the First year, November, 2002, 18.03.2002, the academic year 2001-2002, 2001-2002, 2001-2002, 2002-2003, 4-1/2 years, nine years, nine years, 2002, 2011, 2007, 4-2/1 years, 2006

CARDINAL: 2012W.P.No.12986, 1,2, 3, 1,2, 3, 3, 1,2, 3, 3, 1,2, 3, 3, 1,2, 3, 1,2, 3, 3, 1, 3, 4.5.2012, One, 2003?5, 29.03.2012, two, 2009.62.23, 12.09.2007, November 2009.Though, 3, 12.01.2011, 2011.66.20, two, 4-1/2, nine, 66, 28.12.2010, 12.01.2011, two, two, 25, 25, one, one, 1, 41, 41, two, one, 5, 515, 4, 606, 4756, 26.6.2012, 9, 12, 4.4.2002, 2nd, 100, two, two, two, two, 4, 606, or&nbsp, 17, or&nbsp, 5, two, 5, 515, 7, 2003."24

ORG: PU/CE/E5/MBBS/2012, Community, PU/CE/E5/MBBS/2012, PU/CE/E5/MBBS/2012, the Administrative decision- Ratification, the Administrative Decision -Ratification No.2010.63.03, Nil, Community, Ophthalmology, OTO-Rhino-Laryngology, the General Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Pediatrics, Ratification No.2010.63.03, Nil, W.P.Nos.12986, Controller of Examinations, Pondicherry University, University, MBBS, the Standing Counsel, the Academic Council of the Pondicherry Univesrity, Nil, MBBS, Standing Counsel for Pondicherry University, the Pondicherry University, MBBS, the Pondicherry University Act, the Indian Medical Council Act, Academic Council, Council, 2009.55.15 &, 01.09.2009, the Academic Council, the Academic Council, the Academic Council, MBBS, the Academic Council, the Indian Medical Council, the Indian Medical Council, University, University, the Indian Medical Council, University, University, the Pondicherry University, the Central University, Parliament, The Academic Council of the University, University, University, the Academic Council, The University, the Medical Council of India, MBBS, the Academic Council, the Government of India, University, University, MBBS, Arrupadai Veedu Medical College, Hospital, MBBS, MBBS, Student, University, University, Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, Registrar, the Medical Council of India, MCI, MCI, University, MCI, University, MCI, MCI, University, the MCI Regulation, the Supreme Court, National Board of Examinations Vs, Visveswaraiah Technological University, the Tamil Nadu Dr., M.G.R. Medical University, W.P.Nos.4592, Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R.Medical University, Registrar, Chennai, Scheme, University, Scheme, University, Scheme, Scheme, University, University, the Government of India, The Centralized Admission Committee, The Government of India, the Central Government, MBBS, the University, University, the Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, University, University, MBBS, the Central Government, Medical Council of India Vs, the Academic council, University, Medical Council of India, MCI, MCI, the Supreme Court, Visveswaraiah Technological University, University, Central, State, University, the State/University, State, University, Central, University, the Supreme Court, M.D. University, the Executive Council of the University, the Academic Council, University, Academic, the Supreme Court, National Board of Examinations, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, The High Court, the High Court, The High Court

ORDINAL: second, second, second, third, third, 4th, third, 4th, first, second, second, first, 4th, fourth, 4th, fourth, 4th, 1st, first

NORP: iii)OTO-Rhino-Laryngology, follows:"17.No

PERSON: Gynaecology, Puducherry, notice.2, T.P.Manoharan, Kandan Doraisamy, Appendix, Ramamurthy, Krishnendu Halder, Mary Peter, Guindy, T.P.Manoharan, Krishnendu Halder, Jahan Singh, Ramamurthy

EVENT: the 3rd Academic Session

FAC: Resolution, Resolution, Resolution, Resolution, the Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute

GPE: M.B.B.S., B.D.S., examination.10, subjects.12, M.Y.Eqbal, Madhu, Singh, affect&nbsp, affect&nbsp

WORK_OF_ART: Rule, Regulation or Practices of the University

PRODUCT: 7 SCC 258

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //