Ms.Tamil Nadu Cements Corporation Ltd. Vs. the Joint Commissioner - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jun-05-2012

Court: Chennai

LAW: Section 115JA, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 115JA, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 115JA, the Companies Act, Section 115J, Section 115J, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 115J, the Companies Act, Section 115J, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 115J, the Companies Act, Section 115JA(2

ORG: Tax Case Appeals, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai, Court, CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Assessing Authority, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals, the Assessing Authority, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Income Tax (Appeals, the Apex Court, ITR 273 APOLLO TYRES LTD., C.I.T., the Apex Court, ITR, LTD, CIT, ITR, CIT, the Apex Court, ITR, LTD, CIT, the Apex Court, ITR 273 APOLLO TYRES LTD., the Apex Court, ITR 273 APOLLO TYRES LTD., ITR, Tribunal, Standing Counsel, Court, Court, Rs.1456.44, the Assessing Authority, the Assessing Authority, Tribunal, ITR 273 APOLLO TYRES LTD., C.I.T., the Apex Court, The Apex Court, The Assessing Authority, the Assessing Authority, The Apex Court, Legislature, ITR, LTD, CIT, the Income Tax Rules, ITR, CIT the Apex Court, the Income Tax Rules, the Supreme Court, ITR, LTD, CIT, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, ITR, CIT, Court, ITR, CIT, the Accounting Standard, Accounting Standards, the Delhi High Court, the Delhi High Court, Court, ITR, CIT, SWAMIJI MILLS LTD, ITR, CIT, Court, ITR, ASST, CIT, Court, Court, ITR, CIT, SWAMIJI MILLS LTD, the Apex Court, ITR 273 APOLLO TYRES LTD., the Apex Court, MAT, ITR, CIT, Tribunal, the Tax Case Appeal

CARDINAL: 24.5.2005, 255, 300, 251, 321, 300, 251, 255, 255, 307, 150, 255, 1A, two, 10, 300, 251, 321, 300, 251, 321, 307, 150, one, 7, 13, 15 and 19, 15, Two, 19, 14, 342, 250, 307, 150, 342, 244, 342, 250, 255, 307, 150

DATE: year 1997-98.JUDGMENT(Judgment, year 1997-98, the prior years, that particular year, previous year, that prior year's, the current year, the year, the prior year, the prior year, the year, the prior year, the prior year, the prior year, the year under consideration.8, the year, adjusting prior year, 1956, the year

WORK_OF_ART: Tax Case (Appeal, C.I.T. Pointing

PRODUCT: Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Bench

PERSON: MALAYALA MANORAMA CO., MALAYALA MANORAMA CO., Schedule 'S', C.I.T, Schedule 'S', MALAYALA MANORAMA CO., MALAYALA MANORAMA CO., KHAITAN CHEMICALS, KHAITAN CHEMICALS, C.I.T, KHAITAN CHEMICALS

QUANTITY: 300 DYNAMIC, 300 DYNAMIC, 300 DYNAMIC

PERCENT: at least 30 percent

GPE: Apex

EVENT: Parts II, Parts II, AS 5