Sundaramurthy Vs. the State Rep by the Deputy Superintendent of Police

Decided On : Apr-19-2012

Court : Chennai

LAW: Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Section 15, Section 32, Section 15, Section 32, Section 15, Section 32, Section 32(1, Section 32(1, Section 32(1, Section 32(1, Section 15(1, Section 32(1, Section 15(1, Section 15(1, Section 32(1, Section 32(1, Section 30, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 32(1, Section 32, Section 30, the Evidence Act, Section 32(1, Section 30, the Evidence Act, Section 30, the Evidence Act, Section 30, Section 20(8, Article 21.11, Section 120-B, Section 120-B, Section 5, section 15, Section 12, Section 15, Section 32, Section 15, Section 32

PERSON: Sec.34, Poonnamallee, JUDGMENTG.M. AKBAR ALI, Sec.207, Murugesan, Murugesan, R. Sankara Subbu, Navjot Sandhu, Afsan Guru, Niranjan Singh v. Jitendra9, A-22, Reeta Mary's case).9, Venkatasubramanian, Venkata Subramanian, Nalini, Nalini, Schedule, Nalini, Venkata Subramanian

GPE: Cr, Spl, Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri, Cr, Crl, Spl, Crl, Delhi, Ahmadi, Crl, Gujarat, Crl, Crl, Spl, W.P Nos, Apex, Gujarat

DATE: 2011, 2003, 23.11.2002, 2002, 1006 of 2002, 10.7.2007, 3.11.2009, 2011, 2003, 3.11.2009, 17.12.2009, 13920/2005, the last four years, the year 2003, the year 2004, 1715, 1996, 2003, 2005, 2007, 27.7.2007, 2006, 3.11.2009, 2011, 2003, 13919, 10.12.2008, 1996, 2005, the same trial.20, less than five years, 30 days

CARDINAL: 12.7.2011, 120B, 149, 148, 333, 353, 387, one, one, 2002.3, five, 27, 5, two, 2000(5, one, 86, 255, 26, 20.42005, 335, 29, two, two, 2, 409, 147, three, four, 147, ten thousand, two, one

ORG: Sessions Court of Trial of Bomb Blast, POTA Cases, POTA, IPC, POTA, the Radical Student Union, the Inspector of Police, NSD Wing, Uthangarai Police Station, A17, A22, Court, Crl, Crl, WP No.13919, Court, Chinnaiyan, Thirunagaram, NBW, POTA, TADA, POTA, POTA, POTA, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, POTA, POTA, POTA, POTA, TADA, TADA, CrPC, POTA, POTA, IPC, POTA, Parliament, POTA, Parliament, TADA, TADA, the High Court, Court, POTA, State, the Court under Section 30 of the Evidence Act, State, POTA, POTA, IPC, the Evidence Act.7, Shaheen Welfare Association vs Union of India and Others, Special Public Prosecutor, Special Public Prosecutor, Special Public Prosecutor, Special Public Prosecutor, the Apex Court, Special Public Prosecutor, TADA, TADA, Special Public Prosecutor, Special Public Prosecutor, Court, A.29, the High Court, Court, Government, the Legal Services Authority, TADA, Shaheen Welfare Association vs Union of India and Others, The Apex Court, TADA, TADA, TADA, TADA, Sections 3 and/or 4 of the TADA Act, Sections 3 and 4, IPC, Special Public Prosecutor, the Apex Court, TADA, TADA, TADA, the Apex Court, TADA, TADA, TADA, POTA, TADA, TADA, POTA, Subbu, TADA, POTA, POTA, Special Public Prosecutor, Special Public Prosecutor, Court, Department of the Tamil Nadu State Government, the Central Government, Special Court, Court, the Legal Aid Panel, Court

NORP: J.1, Maoist, Rules

EVENT: the 1993 Amendment of TADA, the 1993 Amendment of TADA

FAC: Kartar Singh case27, Kartar Singh case27, Sections 25

ORDINAL: first, second

WORK_OF_ART: Prakash Kumar Alias Prakash Bhutto vs State of, Kartar Singh, Prakash Kumar Alias Prakash Bhutto vs State of