Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Super Cassetts Industries Ltd. Vs. Music Broadcast Pvt. Ltd.

Decided On : May-03-2012

Court : Supreme Court of India

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Copyright Act, Section 31, the Copyright Act, the Copyright Act, Section 31, the Copyright Act, Section 31, the Copyright Act, the Copyright Act, Section 31of, the Copyright Act, Section 11, the Copyright Act, Section 12, Section 74, Section 31, the Consumer Protection Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 14, Section 14, the Copyright Act, Section 31, the Copyright Act, Section 31, the Copyright Act, Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code, Section 31, Section 31, the Copyright Act, the Copyright Act, Section 31, Section 25, Section 25(i, the Patents Act, the Copyright Act, Section 12, the Copyright Act, Section 12, Section 19-A of the Copyright Act, Section 31 of the Act.28, the Copyright Act, Section 30, Section 52 of the Act, Section 72, the Copyright Act, the Copyright Act, the Indian Copyright Act, Section 22(1, Section 19(6)of, Section 19(6, Rule 18, Section 19(6, the Copyright Act, the Civil Code, the Copyright Act, Section 30, Section 31(1)(b, Section 30, the Copyright Act, Section 31, Section 31(1)(b, Section 75, the Copyright Act, Section 31 of the Act, Section 31(1)(b, the Copyright Act, Section 31, Section 31, the Copyright Act, the Copyright Act, Chapter II, Section 11, Chapter, section 15, the States Reorganisation Act, section 74, the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 6, Section 31, Section 14, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 31, the Copyright Act, Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 31, Section 31

NORP: J.1, Indian, Indian, Punjab, Indian, Indian, Statute, Statute

ORG: the Copyright Board under Section 31, Board under Clause, Sub-Section, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, Super Cassettes Industries Ltd., the Copyright Board, Board, the High Court, the Copyright Board, The High Court, the Copyright Board, Super Cassettes, Board, Court, Super Cassettes, the Copyright Board, Entertainment Network India Ltd., Super Cassettes, Court, Phonographic Performance Ltd., the Copyright Board, PPL, Court, the Copyright Board, PPL, Super Cassettes, Super Cassettes, MBPL, Super Cassettes, the Copyright Board, MBPL, Super Cassettes, Super Cassettes, Writ Petition No.6255, the Copyright Board, Super Cassettes, Respondents, MBPL, the Delhi High Court, Board, Respondents, Super Cassettes, the Delhi High Court, MBPL, the Copyright Board for PPL, Super Cassettes, the Copyright Board, Super Cassettes, MBPL, Super Cassettes, MBPL, Super Cassettes, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, MBPL, MBPL, Super Cassettes, MBPL, the High Court, the Copyright Board, the Delhi High Court, inter alia, the Delhi High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Super Cassettes, the Copyright Board, PPL, the Board on 25th August, Super Cassettes, the Bombay High Court, Music Choice India Pvt. Ltd., Phonographic Performance Ltd., the Copyright Board, The High Court, Super Cassettes, MBPL, the Copyright Board, Board, the High Court, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, Tribunal, the Copyright Board, Board, Board, the High Court, the Copyright Board, Board, Court, Rajeev Hitendra Pathak &amp, Court, the District Forum, the State Commission, Court, the District Forum, the State Commission, Court, Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund Vs, Court, Court, Haryana High Court, State Election Commission, AIR 1997, P &amp, the High Court, the Election Tribunal, the Punjab State Election Commission Act, Court, the Election Tribunal, Court, the Election Tribunal, Lingamma Vs, AIR, the Appellate Tribunal, the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal Act,1976, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Copyright Board, the High Court, the High Court, the Copyright Board, the High Court, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, Tribunal, the Telecom Disputes Settlement &, Appellate Tribunal, the National Green Tribunal, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Copyright, the Copyright Board, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Union of India, Court, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Copyright Board, the High Court's, Copyright Board, Statute, Board, Super, Board, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, Board, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, Board, the Copyright Board, a Civil Court, Board, Court, Board, the Copyright Board, Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, the Parliament of the United Kingdom, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Morgan Stanley's, Court, Allahabad Bank, Court, the Recovery of Debts Due to, Suit, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal under Section 22(1, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Industrial Credit &, Investment Corporation of India Ltd., Grapco Industries Ltd. &amp, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Court, the District Forum, the State Commission, Court, Tribunal, Statute, the High Court, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, the High Court, a Civil Court, Court, Board, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, Board, the Copyright Board, Board, Super Cassettes, the Copyright Board, Respondents, Tribunal, Respondents, ENIL, the Appellant in Entertainment Network, Super Cassette Industries Limited[(2008, Board, Board, the High Court, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, Copyright Office, Copyright Board, Copyright Board, Board, Copyright Board, Copyright Board, The Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, Bench, the Copyright Board, Bench, Copyright Board, Board, the Copyright Board, Copyright Board, Board, the Copyright Board, a Civil Court, Sections 345, Board, Copyright Board, Board, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, The Copyright Board, Board, Board, Court, Tribunal, Court, Statute, Applicant, the Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund's, Court, Court, the District Forum, the State Commission, Magistrate, Magistrate, Tribunal, Allahabad Bank, Calcutta, Grapco Industries Ltd.'s, the Copyright Board, the Copyright Board, Court, Tribunal, the Copyright Board, Board, the High Court

DATE: 1957, 1st September, 2011, 28th March, 2011, 1st September, 2011, 2011, 2011, 16th May, 2008, 25th August, 2010, September, 25th August, 2010, 25thMarch, 2002, 2010, 25th August, 2010, 25th August, 2010, 15th September, 2010, 25th August, 2010, 25th August, 2010, 28th March, 2011, 25th December, 2010, 28th March, 2011, years, 25th August, 2010, 2009, 1957, 2011, 1986, 1994, 1994, 1985, 1977, 2008, 31, 1969, 1999, 1993, 1999, a month, 1956, 1973, 1860, 1973, 31, 1986, Section 31

CARDINAL: 1, 31, 2, two, 1, two, eight, 2%of, 39, 9, 287, three, 4, 225, four, 164, 18, 1, 1, 125, 228, three, 30, 31, 31, 31, 1914.29, 2, 65, 6, 755, 4, 14, one, 19, 13, 30, 116, 116, 12.Powers, 37, 1956).b, less than three, five, 345, 346, 2, 193, 228, 45, 346, 228, 31, 32and

GPE: India, India, it.7, Mumbai, Delhi, nugatory.10, Court.12, Karnataka, Bindeshwari, India, Singh, anapplication.39, Bindeshwari, M.K.

WORK_OF_ART: Super Cassettes, The Full Bench, Bench

PERSON: Amit Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Kashinath Karekar &, Anr, Sibal, Kartick Das, Sham Lal Vs, Sibal, Karnataka, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Kali Singh, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, M.K. Mohammed Kunhi, Singhvi, Calcutta Vs, Radha Krishna Maity &amp, Singhvi, Singhvi, Rajeev Hitendra Pathak's, Singhvi, Bhaskar P. Gupta, Singhvi, Singhvi, Gupta, Gupta, Gupta, Gupta, Prathiba Singh, Singhvi, Gupta, Singh, Harish Salve, Salve, Salve, Salveurged, Salve, Salve, Sibal, case.36, Sibal, Sibal, Sibal, Benches, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Bhaskar P. Gupta, Harish Salve, Rajeev Hitendra Pathak's, Sibal, them.40, Mohammed Kunhi's, Order XXXIX Rules 1, Salve

ORDINAL: 9th, 15th, 25th, fifth, firstly, 9th, second

LOC: 2010,Music Broadcast Pvt, Single Judge, Respondent, Respondent

PERCENT: 4%

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, the Civil Court.33, Bench

FAC: Sections 193, Sections 193

EVENT: the Civil Procedure Code

TIME: under this Act

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //