Bharath Skins Corporation Vs. Taneja Skins Company Pvt. Ltd

Decided On : Dec-21-2011

Court : Delhi

LAW: Page 1, Article 1 of the Schedule, Page 2, Article 1 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article 1 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Page 3, Mercantile Law Amendment Act, Section 8, the Limitation Act 1859, Article 1 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, Section 8, the Limitation Act, Page 4, Article 1, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Article 1 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article 1 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article 85, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 1 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, the Indian Limitation Act, the Banking Companies Act, Page 5, the Indian Limitation Act, the Indian Limitation Act, the Banking Companies Act, Article 85, the Indian Limitation Act, Article 1 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article 115 of the Jammu, the Indian Limitation Act, the Indian Limitation Act, Page 10, Page 11, Article 115 of the Jammu, Article 1 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article 1 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article in the Schedule to the Limitation Act, Article 14 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article 14 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article 1 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article 14 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article 14 of the Schedule to the Limitation Act, Page 12, Article 14, Page 13, Article 14 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article in the Schedule to the Limitation Act, Article 113, Article 113, Article 113, Page 15

DATE: November, 2011, December, 2011 +, 29.08.2001, 02.09.1985, 03.09.1982, 03.09.1982, 1963, 1963, the year, such year, 1963, 1623, 1795, 1828, 1857, 1859, 1963, 1859, years year, such year, 13/2002, 1963, 1963, 1963, 1963, 1711, 1908, 1963, 1908, 1908, three years, the year, such year, 1859, 1871, 1877, 1908, June 25, 1947, December 29, 1950, December 29, 1950, 1908, 1963, 1349, June 23, 1947, 1930, 13/2002, monthly, 1963, 1963, 1963, 1963, 1963, 1963, 1963, years, 1849, the 1st of January, the 2nd, 3rd,, monthly, quarterly, the 1st of January, a subsequent day, the 1st of January, 1856, 1963, 1963, three years, 13.07.1985, 13.07.1985 and, 24.07.1985, 02.09.1985, 29.08.2001, DECEMBER 21, 2011

CARDINAL: 13/2002, 26,30,000/-, 2, 3., 11.08.1978, 56, 15, 19,42,982.26, 7,000/-, 19,35,982.26, 4, 5, 6, No.2, one, 101, one, 15, Three, 15, 18 and 19, 18 and 19, 11, 12, 11, 1871, 142, 144, 1953, 91, 1960]1SCR563, 13, 6, 15, 7, 15, two, two, one, 14, 8, 15, two, 5, 6, 649, 9, 15, one, 13,000, 15, 10, 13,000, 13,000, 15, 16, 17, 18, 15, Three, 20, 21, 3.106, 15, 18, one, one, one, 24, 14, 15, 25, 26.06.1985, 24.07.1985, 2,000/-, 5,000/-, 26, 27, 15

ORG: Rao, Advocate, JUSTICE, P) Ltd., M/s.Bharat Skins Corporation, Legislature, AIR 1965, SC, The Shillong Banking Corporation, the Supreme Court, Holloway, Tea Financing Syndicate Ltd., Central Calcutta Bank Ltd., Court, Hindustan Forest Company, Holloway, Bank, Emphasis, the Supreme Court, AIR 1959, Hindustan Forest Company, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the Tea Financing Syndicate Ltd., Halloway, A.C.J., Rankin, C.J., the High Court, Rankin, C.J., RFA(OS, Emphasis

PERSON: Atanu Mukherjee, versus TANEJA SKINS COMPANY PVT. LTD, J.N.Aggarwal, S.P. GARG, Common Law, Catlings, Schedule, Hirada Basappa, Gadigi Muddappa, Chandrakamal Bezbaruah I. L.R[1931, Monotosh K. Chatterjee, Act XIV, Schedule, Chandrakamal Bezbaruah, Dood v. Wigley, Bonsey v Woodsworth

LOC: Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Madras, Jammu, Single Judge

ORDINAL: first, first, first, 4th, 5th, first

GPE: RFA(OS, RFA(OS, England, RFA(OS, England, India, RFA(OS, Sections, RFA(OS, RFA(OS, RFA(OS, RFA(OS, RFA(OS, RFA(OS, RFA(OS

MONEY: 15 Limitation Act, 15 Limitation Act, 7,000/-

LANGUAGE: English

FAC: Kesharichand Jaisukhlal v

NORP: Indian, Art.87, A. Such, Indian

PRODUCT: Calcutta, No.1