Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/S.Sterilite Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.

Decided On : Dec-19-2011

Court : Chennai

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 148, the Income Tax Act, the Factories Act, Section 80 IB, the Income Tax Act, Section 80 IB, the Income Tax Act, the Factories Act, Section 80 IB, the Income Tax Act, Section 80 IB, Section 115 JB, Chapter VIA, Section 80 IB, Chapter VIA, Section 80 IB, Chapter VIA of Rs.186,65,45,794/-, Section 80 IB, Section 80, Section 80 IB, Section 143(3, the Income Tax Act, Section 154, the Income Tax Act, Section 154, Section 147, Section 148, Section 147 of the Act, Section 139 of the Income Tax Act, Section 148, the Income Tax Act, Section 147, the Income Tax Act, Section 154, section 115JB, Section 148, Section 80IB of the Act, Section 80 IB, Section 80, Section 115 JB, Section 148, Section 80 IB, Section 148(1, Section 148, Section 147, Section 80 IB, Section 80 IB, Section 80 IB, Section 147 of the Act, Section 80IB of the Act  a, Section 115 JB, Section 80, Section 115 JB, Section 80HHC, Section 115JB, Section 80HHC, Section 80HHC of the Act, Section 115 JB, Section 154, Section 147, the Right to Information Act, Section 80 IB, Section 147 of the Act, Section 154, Section 154, Section 147, Section 154, Section 147, Section 154, Section 147, Section 80, Section 147 of the Act, Section 147 of the Act, Section 147, Section 147, Section 147, the Explanation to Section 147(1, Section 80 IB, Section 80 IB, Section 80IB, Section 148, Section 147, Section 80 IB, Section 147, Section 147(1, Section 147, Section 147 of the Act, Section 154, Section 154, Section 147, Section 147 of the Act, Section 147 of the Act, Section 80 IB, Section 147, Section 80 IB, Section 80 IB, Section 80 IB, Section 80 IB, Section 80, Section 84, Section 80, Section 80 IB, Section 80 IB, Section 154, Section 80, Section 115 JB, Section 143(3, Section 80 IB, Section 154, Section 154, Section 147, Section 154, Section 147 of the Act, Section 154, Section 147, Section 147 of the Act, Section 154, Section 147, Section 80 IB, Section 115 JB, Section 147, Section 154, Section 80, Section 80 IB, Section 147, Section 147, Section 147, Section 147, Section 147 Explanation 2(c, Section 80 IB, Section 147 of the Act, Section 147, the Explanation to Section 147, section 34, Section 147A, Section 147, the Direct Tax Laws Amendment Act, Section 147, Section 147 of the Act, Section 147 of the Act, the Amending Act, section 147.--A, Section 147, Section 147, the Amending Act, Section 147, Section 147, Section 80 IB, Section 80, Section 147 of the Act, Section 154, Section 147, Section 147, Chapter VI A, Section 115JB, Section 115 JB, Section 147, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226, Section 147 and Section 154, Section 80IB, Section 147 of the Act, the Constitutional Bench, the Right to Information Act, Section 147 of the Act, Section 147

ORG: W.P.Nos.24476, Court, Chinchpada Unit, CCR Refinery, the Union Territory of Dadra, Haveli, Court, the Rakholi Unit, Chinchpada Unit, Rakholi Unit, Chinchpada Unit, Rakholi Unit, Assessing, Units, the Chartered Accountant, the Chinchpada Unit, the Rakholi Unit, the Chinchpada Unit, the Rakholi Unit, Assessing, HHC, P &amp, L A/c. (iii) Mistake, ACSR Rakholi Units, Court, Court, Rakholi Unit of Rs.13.22, Chinchpada, Rs.404.42, Rakholi Unit, Chinchpada, Chinchpada Unit, Rs.67,17,311/-, Profit, Profit, ACSR, Chinchpada Unit, Chinchpada Unit, Rakholi Unit, Chinchpada Unit, the Chinchpada Unit, Rakholi Unit, Chinchpada Unit, Rakholi Unit, Chinchpada Unit, Rakholi Unit, the Chinchpada Unit, the Rakholi Unit, the Rakholi Unit, Chinchpada Unit, Income Tax, Chinchpada Unit, Rakholi Unit, the High Court, the Tax Audit Report under Section 44AB, Sections 148, Automobiles Ltd., the Income Tax Officer, Calcutta Discount Company Ltd., SC, Income Tax, Kelvinator of India Ltd., the Apex Court, Income Tax, Poona Vs Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd., Nestor Pharmaceuticals Limited, Southern Structurals Limited, Chinchpada Unit, the Rakholi Unit, Sunil Kumar Jain Vs, Court, Court, Explanation, Court, P.V.S. Beedies Pvt. Ltd., Dalmia Pvt, Income Tax, the Apex Court, Standing Counsel, Revenue, Standing Counsel, Chinchpada Unit, CCR Refinery, the Union Territory of Dadra, Haveli, Authority, the Chinchipada Unit, the Rakholi Unit, Units, the Chinchpada Unit, the Rakholi Unit, Chinchpada Unit, Rakholi Unit, Chinchpada Unit, Rakholi Unit, Revenue, year&rdquo, year&rdquo, Southern Structurals Limited, Income Tax, Poona Vs Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd., Nestor Pharmaceuticals Limited, Southern Structurals Limited, Court, Court, Automobiles Ltd., Sections, Revenue, the Apex Court, Calcutta Discount Company Ltd., Eicher Ltd., SC, Income Tax, Kelvinator of India Ltd., Assessing, the Apex Court, Calcutta Discount Company Ltd., the Apex Court, Legislature, Explanation, Emphasis, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, Explanation, The Apex Court, ITR, Lakhmani Mewal Das, the Apex Court, the Income Tax Officer, SC, Income Tax, Kelvinator of India Ltd., the Apex Court, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, Department, the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, Parliament, believe&rdquo, Parliament, Circular, ITR St., the Apex Court, SC, Income Tax, Kelvinator of India Ltd., the Chartered Accountant, the Apex Court, the Delhi High Court, Calcutta Discount Company Ltd., the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, Sunil Kumar Jain Vs, the High Courts, Court, the High Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Modern Steel Industries V. State, U.P., Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, V. Super Highway Services, National Sample Survey Organization, the High Court, Court, Chinchpada Unit, Rakholi Unit, Court, Dalmia Pvt, Income Tax, SC, Income Tax, Kelvinator of India Ltd., Calcutta Discount Company Ltd., the Office of the Commissioner

DATE: 24478, 2009, years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, 19.03.2009, years, 1961, 1948, the assessment year 1999-2000, April 1998, the assessment year 1999-2000, 1961, the assessment year 1999-2000, 1961, the assessment years 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04, 18th March 1998, 22nd February 1999, the assessment year 2000-01, the assessment year 1999-2000, the first year, 2000-01, the assessment year 2002-03, Form 10CCB, the assessment year 2003-04, the assessment year 2004-05, years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, the five year period, years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, 28.2.2005, 30.3.2006, 28.12.2006, years, the fourth year, the third year, the assessment year 2003-04, the fifth year, the fourth year, the assessment year 2004-05, the fifth year, the assessment year 2003-04, 20.7.2006, 13th October 2009, 19.03.2009, years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, the above assessment years, years, 30 days, 11.5.2009, the assessment year 2003-04, the assessment year 2003-04, 2003-04, 18.03.1998 (Previous Year 1997-98, 6th year, 1996-97 &, initial year being 1997-98, 7th year, the sixth year, the assessment year 2004-05, 19.3.2009, year 2003-04, three assessment years, 24.07.2009, four years, years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, four years, the assessment years, four years, the five years' period, 7th June 1996, 18th March 1998, five assessment years, April, 1998, 22nd February 1999, 18.03.1998, Form 10CCB, 2002, the assessment year 2003-04, 2005, the assessment year 2003-04, 1994, today, 1961, 2010, the year, the year, the four years', 2006, 1974, 2010, 1998-99, 2000-2001, years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, 2006, 1999, 7th June 1996, 18th March 1998, April 1998 and 22nd February 1999, the assessment years 1997-98, 1998-99, the year, the first year, the year, 1st April 1998, 22nd February 1999, the first five years, the initial assessment year of the date, year 1999-2000, 2000-2001, years 2002-03, 2003-04, 2004-05, the previous year, the initial assessment year, five years, the year, 2006, 1974, 2010, the assessment year 2003-04, 20.7.2006, May 2009, 1994, today, 2003-2004, 32, years 2002-2003, 2004-2005, the assessment year 2002-2003, 1961, 2007, 2010, 1961, a period of, eight years, four years, 37, four years, 1976, the particular year, 1987, 2010, post 1st April 1989, 1st April, 1989, 1987, October 31, 1989, 1990, 1989, 1989, 42, today, 1998, 2010, all the years, 44, years 2002-03, the four year limitation period, four years, the assessment year, 45, years, 46, 1961, 2006, 2011, 2003, 2001, 2010, 2009, 1998, 49, the first year, 1999-2000, 2000-2001, 2003-2004, years 2002-2003, 2004-2005, 2010, 1961, 2009

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, 11th, second, first

CARDINAL: 2, 07.06.1996, 3, 4, 115JB, 80, 143(3, 80, 5, 6., 10CCB, 80HHC, Form 3CD, 3CD, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 07.06.1996, 6.9.2002, 13, 14, 15, 154, 16, 206, two, 41, 320, 1, 1, 286, 674, 93, 322, 631, 1977, 110, 164, 17, 284, 18, 1, 1, 19, 237, 26.9.2011, 1, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 9, 26, 27, 1977, 110, 164, 286, 674, 93, 322, 631, 1977, 110, 164, 28, 29, 154, 147, 30, 206, two, one, two, 31, 41, 294, 310, 320, 1, 33, 1, 34, 1, 35, 41, 13, 14, 15, 12, 36, two, 38, 103, 39, 320, 40., 182, 1, 29, 7.2 Amendment, 41, 320, 43, 41, 47, 284, 48, 5, 2, 10, 14, 8, 50, 26.9.2011, 1, 320, 41, 51, 52, 1, 1

PERSON: Silvassa, Nagar, i. Assessee, Delhi Vs, Silvassa, Delhi Vs, Delhi Vs, believe&rdquo, Delhi Vs, Sahnia V. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Anr, Anr, Anr, Delhi Vs

NORP: Form No.4

PERCENT: 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 30%, 30%, 100%, 30%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%

GPE: Rakholi, Rs.404,42,59,243/-, Chinchpada, assessee, Assessee, Rakholi, Profit, Chinchpada, Delhi, Nahar, Rakholi, Delhi

PRODUCT: Section 148, 191, 191, 191, 191, 191

WORK_OF_ART: 548 (Bom, 548 (Bom, a Writ Petition, a Writ Petition

QUANTITY: 3 SCC 321

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //