R.Antony Vs. the District Collector

Decided On : Oct-21-2011

Court : Chennai

LAW: Rule 17, Rule 17

CARDINAL: 1, 11, 8.30, 3, 1, 869, 2, 5, 7.This, 7, 231, 7, 394, 9, 562, two, 5, 7, 1, 26, 26, 11

PERSON: Tmt, Maria, lorry accident, Maria, Tamil Nadu, Ibrahim Mahammad Issak, Trichy, Mst, Atkin, Stevenson, Jyothi Ademma, Fenton, Macnaghten, Macnaghten, Shakuntala Chandrakant Shreshti v. Prabhakar Maruti Garvali

TIME: 03.11.2010, 7.30 a.m., early hours of the morning

ORG: the Construction Workers Welfare Board, Special Government Pleader, Group Personal Accident Insurance Scheme, the Tamil Nadu Construction Workers Welfare Scheme, Personal Accident Insurance, FIR, Welfare Board, Chennai, Supreme Court, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Mackinnon Mackenzie and Co., Superintending Engineer, Parambikulam Aliar Project, Court, Satiya, Sub-Divisional Officer, M.P., Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, the Supreme Court, Plant Engineer, Thorley &amp, Co. Ltd., AC 443, AC 667, the Supreme Court, inter alia, the Social Construction Workers Welfare Scheme, the State Legislature, the Workmen's Compensation Act, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme

GPE: Dindigul, S.Rly, Smt, Basantibai, A.C., Haldane, A.C., JT

DATE: the same day, 1994, 2001, 2007, 1970, 1969, Para 5, 1983, 1995, 1975, 1971, 1932, 2006, 1903, 1914, 2007, a period of, eight weeks

ORDINAL: second, first, second, second

FAC: the Tamil Nadu Manual Workers Social Security and Welfare Scheme

PRODUCT: Para 9

NORP: Donoghue

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act