Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vishnu So Eknath Patil and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Decided On : Sep-29-2011

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

LAW: section 34, the Indian Penal Code, section 34, the Indian Penal Code, section 169 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, section 173(8, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 32, the Criminal Law, Article 226 of the Constitution and of the Supreme Court, Article 32, Article 142(1, Constitution, Section 6, the Delhi Act, Section 156(3

CARDINAL: 2, 8-6-2007, 17, 3, 2, 4, 504, 506, one, 2, 5, 504, 506, two, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 17, 8-6-2007, 4, 142, 2, 9, 129, six, ten, 3, 333, 14, two, 10-3-1989, 16, 6, 8-6-2007, 24-8-2007, 7, 8-6-2007

ORG: the Adhoc Additional Sessions, Shiradhon, CR No, the Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, Judicial Magistrate, the Court of Sessions, Shiradhon, CR No, CID, CBI, Adhoc Additional Sessions, CID, CID, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Reeta Nag, State, Magistrate - Held, Magistrate, Magistrate, CrPC, Magistrate, S. 319, High Court, Magistrate, Court, the Apex Court, Central Bureau of Investigation through S.P, the High Court, CBI, Court, the High Court, CBI, State, State Government, the Apex Court, Magistrate, CBI, CID, the State Government / Supreme Court / High Court, CID, the Court of Sessions

GPE: Osmanabad, Osmanabad, Osmanabad, India, Rajasthan, Osmanabad, Bombay, Osmanabad

PERSON: Kallamb, Gopinath Dnyanoba Patil, Gopinath Patil, Dharma Pande, Kallamb, Gopinath Patil and, Kallamb, Kallamb, Kallamb, Gopinath Patil, Dharma Pande, Osmanabad, Prayer, 2, Osmanabad, Jaipur, vide Kashmeri Devi v. Delhi Admn, Bench

NORP: Dist, Sessions

TIME: the afternoon, about 3.30 pm one

DATE: 8-6-2005, 7-8-2006, 2009, 2001

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //