Vikas Gachli Vs. Competition Commission of India

Decided On : Sep-01-2011

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Constitution Bench, Rule 18

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 13, one, 3., three, 7, 3, 3, 4, 3, 721, one, 20, 4., 7, 7, 5, 9, 4, two, 9, 6, 9, 9, two, 4, 7, 8, 7, 9, 12, 13, 14, 11, 15, 16, 15, 17, 13, 20, one, 18, 19, 20, 3, two, 8, 8, one, one, one, 10(ii, one, 21, 6, 293, 10, 3, 7, 11, 3, 330, 8, 161, 2, 479, 6, 777, 12, 3, 721, two, 13, 14., only 1, 15, three, more than 10 and five, less than 10, 100, 100, 16, 1, 2, 40, only 6, 34, 17, 13, only 5, 4, 3, 1, 18, 22, 19

ORG: -Court, Vikas Gachli, the Competition Commission of India, SC, Reliance, Karnataka Public Service Commission, A.P., Durgacharan Misra, State of, Umesh Chandra Shukla v. Union of India, Nos.4, LPA No, Union of India, Durgacharan Misra, Commission, Lordships, Commission, Court, State of Bihar &amp, Ors, OBC, State, the Apex Court, the Punjab Civil Service, Judicial Branch) Service Rules, the High Court, the High Court of Punjab, Lordships, the State Government, the State Government, Government, of Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission, the Apex Court, State, State, State, Court, State, Haryana v. Subhash Chander Marwaha, the Supreme Court, State, Ors, Raj Kumar Sharma &, State, State, UOI &, the High Court, the Delhi Judicial Service Rules, the High Court, the National Law School of India University, Board, Commission, Commission, Amit Tayal, Commission, LPA No.561/2011, Yogesh Yadav, Commission, OBC, a Competition Commission, Commission, Commission

DATE: 24th May, 2011, 11th November, 2009, 2008, 1990, 2008, 1987, 1985, 14th February, 2010, August, 2011, 2010, 1974, 1994, 1993, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2010, 1985, 1970, 14th February, 2010

PERSON: W.P.(C, Hemani Malhotra, N.T. Devin Katti v., Hemani Malhotra, K. Manjusree v. State of, Yogesh Yadav, Munsifs, Devin Katti, Hemani Malhotra, Mithilesh Kumar, Haryana v. Subash Chander Marwaha, Bench, Haryana, Kumar Potdar, Neelima Shangla v. State, Jatendra Kumar v. State of Punjab, Jagdish Chopra, S.S. Balu, Anr, Anr, Rajkishore Nanda, Chandra Shukla v., Rule, Bangalore, Neha Raj, Praachi Mishra, Vijay Kumar, M.L. Tayal

PERCENT: 55.25%, at least 65% or 70%, 65/70%, 54.24%, 80%, 20%, 50%, 40%, 65/70%, 50/40%, 50/40%, 80%, 20%, 50/40%, 65% / 70%, 65%, 45%, 55%, 40%, 40%, 100%, 60%, 65%, 50%, 40%, 50/40%, 65%, 65%

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, first, second, first, second, 5th, Firstly, Secondly, first, second, third

GPE: Orissa, N.T., Rules, Shankarsan Dash v. Union of India, Kerala, Orissa, Umesh

MONEY: 50 marks, 30 marks, 55 per cent, two marks, 54.25 marks, 20 marks, 70 marks, 65 marks

NORP: Rules, Rules, Rules