Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kusum Lata Sharma Vs. State and anr.

Decided On : Sep-02-2011

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 12, Section 12, Section 498A IPC, Section 2, Section 2(q, Section 2(q, Section 2(q, the Domestic Violence Act, the Domestic Violence Act, Section 2(q, Section 2(q, Section 2(q, Section 2, Section 2(q, the DV Act, Section 2, Section 2(q, Section 19(1, Article 14, Section 2, Section 2(q, the DV Act, the DV Act, Section 2(a, Section 2(a, Section 498A, the Indian Penal Code, Section 498A. 9

CARDINAL: 1, one, 2005(in, 2, 2., 3., 4., 3, 650, 14, 15, 16, 588, 2, 3, 5, 472, 12, 13, 8, 139, 14, 155, 1961]2SCR295, 1996CriLJ3237, 14, 146, 28, one, 15, two, two, 16, two, 19, 6, 2(a, two, 7, 2(f, two, 8, 10, 11

ORG: Respondents, PS Hauz Khas, Nagender Vashishtha &amp, Court, Metropolitan Magistrate, the Protection of Women, the Complainant/Respondent No, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, the Respondent no.2, the Statements of Objects &, the „females, the Honble Supreme Court, Lordships, Legislature, the High Court, the Bombay High Court, Court, Court, UOI &, Southern Institute for Social Science Research, Court, the Supreme Court, Ahmedabad Municipal Corpn, the High Court, Seaford Court Estates Ltd., Asher, Parliament, Legislature, Court, Ors, S.S.C., the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation, the High School or College, Ahmedabad Urban Development Area, Court, Star India P. Ltd., The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Ors, Court, Parliament, State of Bihar v. Bihar Distillery Ltd., Court, the expression „relative, Court, the Statement of Objects &, the Statement of Objects &, the Honble Supreme Court, the Statement of Objects

GPE: New Delhi, Sou, Amravati, Crl, Municipality, Ors.&nbsp, Ahmedabad Municipality

PERSON: Shakuntala Sharma, Reasons, Sandhya Manoj Wankhade, Manoj Bhimrao Wankhade &, Respondent Nos, Varsha Kapoor, S.S. Jagnayak, Anr, Nilaybhai R. Thakore &amp, Anr, of M. Pentiah, Muddala Veeramallappa, Gopal Reddy v. Slate, Protection Order under Section, Residence Order under Section 19, Reasons, Reasons, Reasons

DATE: 8th March, 2011, 2005, 2011, 13, 2005, 2005, 15 th July, 2009, 5th March, 2010, 2009, 2010, 1999, 1994, 2008

PRODUCT: the Nagpur Bench, Respondent

WORK_OF_ART: Loopholes to Escape the Respondents, 2 All ER

ORDINAL: first, First

NORP: Indian

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //