C.Ram Prakash and anr. Vs. Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd. and ors.

Decided On : Aug-23-2011

Court : Chennai

LAW: the Electricity Act, Section 14 of “The Electricity Act, Section 164 of “The Electricity Act, the Indian Telegraph Act, the Electricity Act, the Indian Telegraph Act, Section 10, the Indian Telegraph Act, Article 300-A of the Constitution of India, Section 10, the Indian Telegraph Act, the Electricity Act, Section 10, the Indian Telegraph Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 3, the Indian Telegraph Act, Hart and Sachs, Section 3, the Indian Telegraph Act, Section 10, the Indian Telegraph Act, Sections 10 and 16, the Indian Telegraph Act, Section 16, the Indian Telegraph Act, Section 16, the Indian Telegraph Act, Section 16, the Indian Telegraph Act, Section 16, the Indian Telegraph Act, Section 10, Section 16, the Indian Telegraph Act, Section 10, Section 16(1, Sections 17 and 19A of the Act, Sections 17 and 19A, Section 16(1, Section 16 of the Act, Section 188 I.P.C., Section 16(1, Section 188, Section 16, Section 10.&rdquo, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the Indian Telegraph Act, the Electricity Act, Section 10, the Indian Telegraph Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2., One, 400, 3, 40, 4, 18.11.2010, 100, 5., 21.12.2010, 6., 8., 9, 1, 2, 2, 3, 1, 4, 5, two, 6, two, 8) Kerala, 5, 9, 3, 10, 3, 11, 4, 12, 4, 13, two, 14, two, 15)Ramakrishna, 16, 743, 16, three, 17, 18, 3, 10, 11, 5, 12, 13, 3, 786, 7, 14, 2, 13, 116, 14, 16, 330, 17. In, 106, 13, 740, 18, 30, 15, 73, 19, 15, 16, One, 5, 246, 5, 729, 17, 144F, 2d, 608, 620, 18, 19, 2010(5, 18, 9, 16, 722, 19, 20, 21, 798, 5, 24, 31, 20, 1, 277, 21, 7, 56. In, 802, 21, 138, 57, 180, 5, 485, 9, 59, 289, 9, 1, 59).&rdquo, 60. In, 733-34, 38, 366, 25, 538, 1947)].&rdquo, 38, 135, 61. In, 297, 52, two, 87.]&rdquo, 702, 21, 21, 763, 22, 10 and 16, 23, 10, Two, 1, 24, 4, 353, 25, 26, No.1, No.2

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, the Full Bench of, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, unnecessary.”2 15, ldquo;It, No.1, LR 527, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, the Full Bench of, The Full Bench, No.1, No.1

ORG: the Central Transmission Utility, the Ministry of Power, Madurai, Government of India, Central Transmission Utility, the Government of India, the Telegraph Authority, the Government of India, the Writ Petition, Court, CTC 353, Court, Court, the Writ Petition, the Writ Appeal, B.P. &amp, T. Product v. K.S.E. Board, Kerala 47, Nithyanandam, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Madras - 2 &, Ismail v. Union of India - AIR, T.N. Electricity Board, Madras - AIR, Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., Writ Appeal No.572 of, Corporation (India) Limited, Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, State Electricity Board, SC, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, India) Ltd., The District Collector, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Chennai, Power Grid Corporation of India Limited, Superintending Engineer, TNEB, the Writ Petition, in Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, context&rdquo, the Hon'ble Apex Court, P) Ltd., v. Union of India, (1989), Statutory Construction, Farwell L.J., Mclntyre Bros. &amp, Tribhuban Parkash Nayyar v. Union of India4, SCR, U.P. SEB v., Hari, AIR, Statute, Statute, Court, Court, RBI, Peerles General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd., Court, gaps&rdquo, Yahoo!, Formerly 'Overture Service Inc.', Intellectual Property Appellate Board, CTC 625, U.P., the Hon'ble Apex Court, Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited, 2009, Sections 23, Justice K.Jaganatha Shetty in Union, Court, Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Carew and Co. Ltd., Union of India8, Bux10 this Court, Crawford, Statutory Constructions, Justice, Parliament, Blackstone, 1st Edn, University of Chicago Press, Kishan Mazdoor Panchayat12 this Court, United Bank of India v. Abhijit Tea Co., Justice Frankfurter, The Interpretation and Application of Statutes, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Neville Wadia14 this Court, Purposive Construction, Purposive Interpretation, 62. In Union of India v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd.15 this Court, State, the House of Lords, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, European Community, River Wear Commrs, AC, Scope of Sections, the Division Bench, Scindia Potteries, India Ltd., AIR 1980, Sec, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, I.P.C., Court, CTC, Court, Court

DATE: 2003, 2003&rdquo, 2003&rdquo, 1885, 2003, 1885, the year 2008, 2009, the year 2009, 1885, 1885, 1972, 1994, 1997, 2001, 2006, 2007, 2007, 2007, 2008, 2008, 2008, 1024, 2008, 2008, 2009, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2003, 1885, 1885, the year 1885, 2010, 830-31, 1885, 1987(1, 12th, SC 1230, 2010, 58, 1765, 1979, '25, 47, 2007, 1885, 1885, 1885, 1885, 1885, February, 1974, April, 1978, May, 1978, 2003, 1885, 2011, 2011

PERSON: Licensee, T. Narayanan v. Power, Gounder v. Power, Magistrate, M.Ponnuswamy, Glanville Williams, Cotton Mills, Francis Bennion, S.S. Magnhild, McCardie, J., KB, Chinnappa Reddy, in Zameer Ahmed Latiful Rehman Sheikh v. State, Imam v. State of Bihar, (2011, Frankin, G.P. Singh, Statue Law, Oliver Wendell Holmes, J.R. v. S.Rajeevan, Kariogowda, Holmes, J., Filip Tiago De Gama, Krishna Iyer, Frankfurter, Learned Hand, Bhudan Singh v. Nabi, Ram Mittal v., Ishwar Singh, Vol, Reed Dickerson, experience&rdquo, Barak, Barak, Aharon Barak, Blackburn, William Adamson17

LOC: Single Judge, Single, M.P.(MD

ORDINAL: second, first, First, second, second, second

FAC: Vivasaya Vizhipunarvu Iyakkam, Delhi 157

GPE: W.A., MD, Karur District, Karur, W.P.No.18367, Guiseppi v. Walling, Singh v., India, US, Gujarat, Gujarat, Quintavalle

NORP: Dist, Latin, Statute, Latin, contra, K.P. Varghese, R., European, European

TIME: the entire Act

MONEY: #, 33 &amp

WORK_OF_ART: the Laws of England, Hart and Sachs