Yograj Infras.Ltd. Vs. Ssang Yong Engineering.

Decided On : Sep-01-2011

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Companies Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 17, Section 17, the Main Agreement and the Agreement, Section 37(2)(b, Section 37(2)(b, Rule 32, the International Arbitration Act, Rule 32, Rule 32, Rule 32, Section 9, Section 9, Section 42 of the 1996 Act, Section 9, Section 42, Section 42, the Arbitration Agreement, the Arbitration Agreement, the Arbitration Agreement, the Arbitration Agreement, Section 37, the International Arbitration Act, Rule 24, Rule 24, the Supplementary Agreement, Rule 24, Section 37, Rule 32, the International Arbitration Act, Section 9, Section 9, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 37 of the 1996 Act, Section 9(b, the International Arbitration Act, Section 42 of the 1996 Act, Section 2(2, Rule 32, the International Arbitration Act, Rule 32, the International Arbitration Act, Section 2(2, Rule 32, Section 42, Section 42, Section 37 thereof.&nbsp

CARDINAL: 1, 2., 3, Four, 26, 13, 28, 6,05,00,000/-, about 88.15, Three, 5,00,00,000/-, 4, 31.10.06, 6.05, three, 101, 1, 101, 1, 101, 3, 5, 144,42,25,884/-, 5, 1,5,7,8,10,19,20,21,22,23, 2, 3(i, 6, No.2, 8., only two, 35, approximately 7, 7.20, 2010.&nbsp, 9, 10, 27.1, 11, 12, 4, 105, 4, 190, 7, 220, 13, 1.1, 1996.&rdquo, 14, 15, 27, 16, two, 1, 305, 3, 17, 18, 19, 20, 221,36,91,097/-, 21, 22, 23, 24, 1, 305, 25, 26, 27, 28, 46, 29, 30, 27, 27.1, 27.2, 32, 28, 33, 27.1, 34, 28, 27.1, 27.1, 37, 36, 38, 4, 105, 4, 190, 7, 220, 1.1, 41

DATE: 1956, 12th April, 2006, 2,19,01,16,805/-, 13th August, 2006, 1996, 31st October, 2006, 29th May, 2009, 22nd September, 2009, 1996, 30th December, 2009, 20th May, 2010, 20th May, 2010, 4th June, 2010, 2010, 5th June, 2010, 29th June, 2010, 32, 5 June 2010, September 2009, 5 June 2010, 13 August, 2006, 23 June 2010, 6 July 2010, 2010, 2nd July, 2010, 1996, 23rd July, 2010, 2010, 26th July, 2010, 31st August, 2010, 13th August, 2006, 23rd September, 2006, the order 29th June, 1996, 2002, 2002, 2008, 2009, 2002, 1996, 1996, 1998, 1992, 1996, 1996, 2002, 30 months, 11th February, 2009, monthly, 22nd September, 2009, 28th September, 2009, 16th August, 2010, 5th June, 2010, 13th August, 2006, 29th June, 2010, 1996, 29th June, 2010, 23rd July, 2010, 31st August, 2010, 2002, 31st August, 2010, 13th August, 2006, 30th December, 2009, 10th March, 2010, 13th August, 2006, 2002, 1998, 1996, 1940, 1961, 1961, 2002, 13th August, 2006, 1996, 31, 1996, 13th August, 2006, 35, 1996, 37, 143A, 2002, 2002, 2008, 2009, 2002, 39, 1996, 40

PRODUCT: Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Award, Agreement, Sections 9 and 37(2)(b, Rule 1.1 of the SIAC Rules, Agreement, Application under Section 9

GPE: the Republic of Korea, Seoul, Korea, New Delhi, New Delhi, India, Narsinghpur, Narsinghpur, Singapore, Singapore, India, India, India, Singapore, Singapore, India, Singapore, Narsinghpur, India, India, Singapore, India, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Narsinghpur, Singapore, India, Singapore, Singapore, India, India, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, India, Singapore, Singapore, India, Singapore, India, Singapore, India, Singapore, the Republic of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, India, India

ORG: the National Highways Authority of India, Construction Co. Ltd., Jhansi-Lakhnadon Section, NH, the State of Madhya Pradesh, SSY, the Appellant Company, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Appellant, Performance Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantees, the Respondent Company, Appellant, Narsinghpur, Madhya Pradesh, Court, the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, Appellant, SIAC Arbitration No.37, inter alia, SSY, Performance Bank Guarantee, Syndicate Bank, SSY, Bank Guarantees, SSY, SSY, the Cross-Claimant, Claimant, PME, Annexure A (Machinery Details, the Claimant's Application, PME, Tribunal, Statement of Materials at Site, the Claimant's Application, Claimant, ref, PME, Arbitrator, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Civil Revision, the High Court, the High Court, the Special Leave Petition, Hotmix Plant, the Arab Bank Loan, Project, Court, Khara and Tarakunde Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., Ramdin Ultratech Pvt. Ltd., the Hotmix Plant, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, the SIAC Rules, the SIAC Rules, inter alia, the SIAC Rules, Court, Bulk Trading S.A., Venture Global Engg, Satyam Computer Services Ltd., Citation Infowares Ltd., Equinox Corporation, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, the International Arbitration Act, the SIAC Rules, the High Court, the SIAC Rules, Indian Courts, the High Court, Agreement, the High Court, the District Court, Contract, this Hon'ble Court, this Hon'ble Court, the District Court, the High Court, the High Court, the SIAC Rules, Agreement, Agreement, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the High Court, the Arbitration Agreement, Curial, Curial, the SIAC Rules of, Court, Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd., ONGC, NTPC, Curial, Court, Curial, Curial, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the High Court, Advocate, the Indian Courts, the Arbitral Tribunal, the “law of, arbitration&rdquo, the National Highways Authority of India, the Singapore International Arbitration Centre Rules, inter alia, SIAC, inter alia, the District Court, Arbitrator, The Civil Revision, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the High Court, inter alia, The Special Leave Petition, inter alia, the SIAC Rules, the District Court, Curial, the Arbitrator at Singapore, the Singapore International Arbitration Act, Curial, Court, Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd., ONGC Ltd. &, Curial, Arbitrators, the District Court, the High Court, the Court of District Judge, Agreement, Curial, the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the “seat, arbitration&rdquo, English Courts, Court, NTPC, the Foreign Awards, Recognition and Enforcement, the Indian Courts, the Arbitral Tribunal, Curial, NTPC, Court, inter alia, Courts, Court, the Foreign Awards, Recognition and Enforcement, NTPC, the SIAC Rules, the Terms of Reference, Court, the Jabalpur Bench, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Indian Courts, Indian Courts, the SIAC Rules, the Arbitrator in Singapore, the SIAC Rules, the Singapore International Arbitration Centre, Party, Agreement, Agreement, the SIAC Rules, the SIAC Rules, Agreement, the Arbitral Tribunal, Curial, the SIAC Rules, Curial, the SIAC Rules, Sections 34, Court, the SIAC Rules, Curial, Bulk Trading S.A., Venture Global Engg, Satyam Computer Services Ltd., Citation Infowares Ltd., Equinox Corporation, the Singapore International Arbitration Centre Rules, Court, the SIAC Rules, the SIAC Rules

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, the Appellant on, Single

PERSON: SSang Yong Engineering, G.R. Easton, Nehru Place, Delhi, b. restrain, Indu Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Rules, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Malhotra, Dharmendra Rautray, Rautray, Routray, Graham Easton, Routray, Narasinghpur, Routray, Routray, Routray, Routray, Routray, Award, Routray, Narasinghpur, Routray, Routray, Routray, Award, Routray, Routray, Routray, Routray, Routray, Routray, Routray, Cap, Statutes

WORK_OF_ART: The Work Order, The Sole Arbitrator, The Sole Arbitrator

PERCENT: 92%, 36%

NORP: c., d., Indian, Indian, Rules, Indian, Indian, Rules, Rules

FAC: the Sole Arbitrator, Bhatia International, the Sole Arbitrator, Bhatia International, Bhatia International, the SIAC Rules, Bhatia International, Bhatia International, Bhatia International, Bhatia International

ORDINAL: third, third, third

QUANTITY: 274,580 cubic metres, 27,580 cubic metres

EVENT: Clause 28, a Supplementary Agreement

TIME: the minutes

LANGUAGE: English, English