ind Barath Powergencom Ltd. Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer and ors.

Decided On : Aug-04-2011

Court : Chennai

LAW: Section 133, Section 133, Section 133, Section 133, Section 133, Section 133, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 133, Section 188 IPC, Section 133, Section 188 I.P.C., Section 133 Cr, Section 133 Cr, Section 188 I.P.C., Section 133, Article 21 of the Constitution, Section 133 Cr, Section 188 I.P.C, Section 188 I.P.C., Section 188, Section 188 I.P.C., Section 188 I.P.C., Section 133, Section 133 Cr, Section 137, Section 133, Section 133 Cr, Section 133, Section 133, Section 133, Section 133, Section 133 Cr, Section 133, Section 134, Section 134(2, Section 133, Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 138 Criminal Procedure Code, Section 133 Criminal Procedure Code, Section 133, Section 138, Section 133 Cr, Section 133 Cr, Section 138, section 133, Section 142 Cr, Section 133, Section 133 Cr, Section 142 Cr, Section 133, Section 133(1, Section 133, Section 141, Section 142, Section 133, Section 133(1, Section 133, Section 133 Cr, Section 133, Section 133 of the Code, Chapter X of the Code, Section 133 of the Code, Section 133 of the Code, Section 133 and Section 144, Section 133, Section 133, Section 133, Section 133, Section 133, Section 133 Cr, Section 133, Section 133, Section 133, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 21 of the Constitution, Section 133, Order under section 133, Section 133, Section 143 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 291, the Indian Penel Code, Chapter X, section 133, section 133, Section 134 Cr, Section 135 Cr, Section 133 Cr, Section 133, Section 133 Cr, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 133 Cr, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 133, Section 133, Section 134 Cr, Section 134 Cr, Section 138 Cr, Section 133, Section 133

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 10.06.2011, 3., 710, 7.5, only 2, 7.5, 3(2, 3(3, 10.06.2011, 3(4, 3(5, 3(6, 926, 3(8, 4, 548,570,571,572, 578, 591, 5., 6, 6(1, 8, 8(1, 9, 10, 6.6.2011, 11, 133, 1, 12, 188, two hundred, one thousand, 13, two, 14, 1, 15, 16, two, 17, 134, 1, 2, 19, 134, 21, 7, 1, 4, 22, 23, 138, 1, 2, 3, 24, 25, 2, 295, 22, 142, 26, 2008(1, 27, II, 28, 10.2.1983, 30, 4, 162, 13, 31, 7, 389, 8, 4, 9, 11.The, 138, 33, 34, 4, 4., 3, 412, 5, 1996(2, 572, 36, 8, 5, 38, 39, 20, 19, 41, 135, 42, 43, 23.2.2010, one, 10.3.2010, 45, 926, 31.3.2011, (New, 8.In, two, 48, 2, 249, two, 1, 10.Before, 50, 51, 52

ORG: These Criminal Revisions, Criminal Revision Case No.534, the Tamil Nadu Power Grid, Arasadi Vilage, the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Drainage Board, the TWAD Board, Ottapidaram Taluk, The District Collector, M/s. Nila Sea Foods Private Limited, Court, Court, the Tamil Nadu Ground Water (Development and Management) Act, Government, the District Collector, the Tamil Nadu Power Grid, Court, W.A.Nos.923, the State Government, The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Legislative Assembly of Ottapidaram, Ottapidaram Taluk, R.D.O, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Additional Advocate, Ottapidaram, T.W.A.D. Board, R.D.O, Court, T.N.E.B., Ottapidaram, Ottapidaram Panchayat Union, Pandiapuram, Ottapirdaram Taluk, the Divisional Development Officer, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Madras High Court, the Tamil Nadu Ground Water (Development and Management) Act, Additional Advocate General, Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Executive Magistrate, the State Government, Executive Magistrate Subordinate, Conditional, Police, the Executive Magistrate, the Executive Magistrate, Ottapidaram, the Inspectors of Police, the Divisional Development Officer, Ottapidaram, The District Collector, the State Government, the Honourable Supreme Court, SC, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, The High Court, the High Court, Divisional Magistrate, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Supreme Court, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, The Executive Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, Court, Pepsico India Holding Ltd., District Revenue, J., Court, MLJ, Tenkasi, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, the High Court of Uttaranchal, Nainital, M/s. Bansal Industries, Nainital, Magistrate, Magistrate, The Calcutta High Court, CDJ, Cal HC 546, Sraban Kumar Sur v. State of, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, Municipal Council, Ratlam, Magistrate, Magistrate, Liquor Ltd., the Supreme Court, Supp, Magistrate, Lordships, the Apex Court, State of, Lordships, Magistrate, Sections 133, Magistrate, the Executive Magistrate, The Supreme Court, the Executive Magistrate, Supreme, the Executive Magistrate, the Executive Magistrate, the Supreme Court, CTC, Union of India, Court, Delhi Water Supply &amp, State, Haryana and Ors, the Executive Magistrate, the Allahabad High Court, ILR, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, the Executive Magistrate, Court, Court, the District Collector, Court, M/s. Nila Sea Foods Pvt. Ltd., K.Venkataraman, the Tamil Nadu Government, Court, M/s. Nila Sea Foods Ltd., the Tamil Nadu Ground Water (Development and Management) Act, Court, M/s. Nila Sea Foods Ltd., Court, the Honourable Supreme Court, Division Bench, Court, W.A.Nos.923, Tirupur Area Development Corporation Ltd., the Tamil Nadu Ground Water (Development and Management) Act, the Division Bench, Government, Court, Division Bench, Court, CTC, Madurai City Municipal Corporation, Tender Notification, Madurai Corporation, Streets, Petitioner-Association, Madurai Corporation, R.Ponnathal, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Government, the Executive Magistrate, the Tamil Nadu Ground Water (Development and Management) Act, the Executive Magistrate, Executive Magistrates, an Executive Magistrate, Executive Magistrate

PERSON: Ka, Tamil Nadu Water Supply, Ka, P.C., K.Krishnasasamy, Khan, Rajadurai, N. Sankar Ganesh, K.Chellapandian, K. Krishnasamy, Panchayats, Mayilvakana Rajendran, K. Krishnasamy, K.Krishnasamy, R.C.No.534/2011, Mela Arasadi, Ottapidaram Tahsildar, Such Magistrate, Shall, Magistrate, tom tom, M.Ajmalkhan, C.V. Sreenivasan, 138 Cr, P.C., V.S.Sankaranarayanan v. Sub-Divisional Magistrate, T. Sundathiram, J., C.V. Avarachan's, Roy v. State, K.Krishnasamy, Ratlam, Srhi Vardichan, Manga Nikumba, Baburao Bhikanna Naidu, Lrs, Anr, Bhagirath Agrawal, Supp, Manga Nikumba, M.K.Balakrishnan, Anr, Schedule V, Form, Appear, Ali, J., R.Sudhakar, J., v. K.Poomani, G.Prabu Rajadurai, P.C., P.C.

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, First, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

DATE: 2011, 23.02.2010, 2010, 10.03.2010, 2003, 2009, 9679-2011, a single day, 2011, 2011, every day, 548/ 2011, 14.06.2011, 10.6.2011, 2.9.2010, 3.2.2011, 2003, one month, six months, P.C. 18, 1995, 21026, 1996, 1996, 13/1/1988, 2001, 1299, 15 days, 2007, 27.3.2009, P.C. 29, 1980, 2003, the present day, 54, 1996, 27, 32, 2005, 1995, 54, 35, 2009, P.C. 37, 1886, the??????.day, 40, 2010, 21.4.2010, 44, 2010, 2011, 2003, 46, 2009, 2003, 47, 2005, 19.01.2005, 49, 2008, the enquiry, Section 143(2

WORK_OF_ART: Rs.3.2 Crores to, Their Lordships, Baburao Bhikanna Naidu, Queen-Empress v. Jokhu

GPE: Tuticorin District, Cr, P.C., Cr, Cr, Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, Tahsildar, Crl, P.C., P.C., P.C., Tamilnadu, Crl, P.C., Puthiamputhur, Crl, P.C., Puthiamputhur, Kulasekaranallur, Vallaram, Kawarnagiri, Chithalakattai, Tharuvaikulam, Puthiamputhur, Ottapidaram Panchayat Union, Cr, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., Tahsildar, Cr, P.C., Cr, Cr, C.A., Cr, P.C., P.C., P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, Crl, P.C., P.C., P.C., Halsbury, Cr, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., Cr, P.C., Crl, P.C., India, Madurai, Tahsildar, Dindigul District, P.C., P.C., Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C.

EVENT: 31.01.2009

NORP: Pudur, Malarkulam, Avarachan

FAC: Tamil Nadu Water Management Act and, the Krishanarayar Teppakkulam East

LOC: South Streets, this Temple City, New Tirupur Area Development Corporation Ltd., New Tirupur Area Development Corporation Ltd.

PRODUCT: Section 138