Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Secretary, Sh. A. P. D.JaIn Pathshala and ors. Vs. Shivaji Bhagwat More and ors.

Decided On : Jul-04-2011

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 9, Amendment Act 14 of 2007, Act 14 of 2007, Chapter VI, Article 233 of the Constitution of India, Article 234, Article 247, Chapter I of Part XI, Constitution, Article 323A, Article 323B, Article 323B, Constitution, a Constitution Bench, Constitution, the Constitution (Administrative Tribunals, Article 323A and Tribunals, Article 323B, Constitution, Article 162 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 162, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 311 of the Constitution

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 27.4.2000, three, Three, 3, 16.8.2000, 4, 16.8.2000, 13.10.2000, 17, Three, 5, 21.6.2001, nine, 6, 29.7.2000, 1.8.2000, 2.5.2008, 2.5.2008, two, 7., 31.3.2008, 31.3.2008, 5.8.2008, two, 15.9.2008, 31.3.2008, 5.8.2008, 27.4.2000, 9, 16.8.2000, three, one, 10, 2.5.2008, 5.8.2008, 11, 12, 13, 2, 2, 323A and, 14, one, 15, 12.10.1978, 16, 234, 247, 323B, 17, 18, 19., 20, three, 5.8.2008, 21, 22, 23, 2.5.2008, 5.8.2008

ORG: The Government of Maharashtra by Government Resolution, Grievance Redressal Committee, Divisional, Education, the Shikshan Sevak, Member Committee, Emphasis, The Bombay High Court, the High Court, the Grievance Redressal Committee, Education, The High Court, Committee, Committee, Civil Court, Committee, the State Government by Government Resolution, the High Court, Committee, Aurangabad, High Court, Aurangabad, the High Court, the State Government, Advocate General, the State Government, Grievance Committee, the Shikshan Sevaks, Grievance Committee, Committee, Sr. Division, Court, Advocate General, Court, Committee, the Grievance Committee, the School Tribunal, Committee, Aurangabad, Aurangabad, Shikshan Sevak, the School Tribunal, the Grievance Committee, the Grievance Committee, W.P., the Grievance Committee, The High Court, the Grievance Committee, Committee, Education, the Grievance Committee, the Grievance Committee, the High Court, Education, the Grievance Committee, the High Court, The Grievance Committee, the Grievance Committee, the Shikshan Sevak, the Grievance Committee, Court, the Shikshan Sevak Scheme, the State Government by Government Resolution, the Grievance Redressal Committee, the Education Department, The Grievance Committee, The High Court, Committee, the Civil Courts, the High Court, the State Government, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Civil Judge, the High Court, the State Government, the State Government, the High Court, the High Court, the Grievance Committee, the Shikshan Sevak, the State of Maharashtra, the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service, School Tribunals, Civil Judge (Senior Division, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Shikshan Sevak Scheme, the Shikshan Sevaks, the High Court, the School Tribunal, School Tribunals, State, State, the State Public Service Commission, the High Court, State, Parliament, Parliament, Administrative Tribunals, Legislature, Legislature, This Court in State, Vishwabharathi House, State, Associated Cement Companies Ltd., Court, State, State, State, Court, Tribunal, Union of India, Court, Civil Courts, Criminal Courts, High Courts, Legislature, Legislature, the European Commission of Human Rights, Parliament, State, the Legislature of the State, the State Government, Government, State, State, State, a High Court, the State Government, the High Court, the State Government, State, Legislature, the High Court, the Grievance Committee, The High Court, Grievance Committee, the High Court, Grievance Committee, the High Court, The Grievance Committee, the Grievance Committee, Shikshan Sevak, the State Government (Education Department, Dutt, University of Delhi -, Industrial Tribunals/Labour Courts, Statute, Committee of Vaish Degree College, the High Court, the Shikshan Sevak, Grievance Committee, the State Government, the Grievance Committee, the Shikshan Sevak, the Education Department, the Grievance Committee, the Education Department, the Shikshan Sevak

FAC: the Shikshan Sevak, the Shikshan Sevaks, the Shikshan Sevaks, the Shikshan Sevak

PERSON: Shikshan Sevaks, Shikshan Sevaks, Nagpur, Nagpur, Nagpur, Nagpur, Shikshan Sevaks, Shikshan Sevak, Shikshan Sevaks, Shikshan Sevak, Shikshan Sevaks, Shikshan Sevaks, Shikshan Sevaks, Shikshan Sevaks, Shikshan Sevaks, Shikshan Sevaks, Part XIV-A, Articles, Shankar Mehta v., Thakur Raghuraj Singh - 1955(1)SCR267, Statutes, Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu [1992Supp(2)SCC651, Statutes, Austria, Jawaya Kapur v. State, Chandra Mohan, Articles 233, Articles 323A, Statutes, Shikshan Sevaks, Shikshan Sevaks, Shikshan Sevaks, Lakshmi Narain -, Shikshan Sevak

DATE: one year, annually, the specified years, mid-year, monthly, 30 days, a period of, six weeks, today, 27.7.2001, 11.6.2001, April, 2001, July, 2001, 18.10.2003, the year 2004, 11.6.2001, September, 2007, 1977, the year 2000, 1976, and Bishamber

GPE: Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, India, District Judges, District Judges, District Judges, India, Karnataka, Zand

NORP: Single

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, second, first, first, Firstly, Secondly, Thirdly, Secondly

LOC: Single

EVENT: the 2007 Amendment

PRODUCT: 323B, Para 6(1

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //