Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dr. (Mrs.) Suhasini Umesh Karanjkar Vs. Kolhapur Municipal Corporation and anr.

Decided On : Jun-06-2011

Court : Mumbai

LAW: Section 30, Section 30, Diagnostic Techniques Act, Section 27 of the Act, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, Rule 12, Section 32, Section 30, Section 34, Amendment Act 14 of, Section 3 of the Act, Section 4, Amendment Act 14 of 2003, the Amendment Act, Section 2(d, Section 2, Section 2(i, section 4, Section 5, Section 6, Section 18, Act 14, Section 22, Section 23, Section 23, Section 17(4, the Amendment Act, Section 17, the Amendment Act, Section 29, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, Act 14 of, Section 32, Section 30, Section 34, Section 32, Section 30, Rule 11, Section 11, Amendment Act 14 of 2003, section 17, section 30, section 23, section 30, the Amendment Act 14 of 2003, Rule 11, Rule 12, section 30, Section 32, Section 34, Rule 12, Rule 12, Section 34 of the Act, Section 32, Section 30, the Amendment Act 14 of 2003, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, Rule 12

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 2, 2, 2., 3, 1, 12, 4, 12, 5., 2, 12, 6, 2, 12, 8, 9, 2, 10., 2, 3., 4, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 1, 1, 16, ten thousand, fifty thousand, 2, 17, 18, 3, 12, 30, 1, 2, 1, 19, 20, 21, 9, 6, 9, 7, 22, 2, 2, five, 23, 12, 12, two, 1, 2, 3, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 2, 2, 29, 2, 2, 30, 8), 39, 31, 2, 1976)4, 2, 348, 4, 1996(3, 32, 721, 33, 34, 2, 12, 35, 12, 8, 650, 70, 2, 37, 38, 39, No.2, 40, 1000, 976, 965, 962, 945, 913, 883, 801, 839, 41, 42

DATE: 23 December, 2010, 1994, 2010, 1994, 1996, 3 September 2003, 31 March 2013, 22 January 2009, 17 February 2009, 5 March 2009, 7 March 2009, 31 August 2009, 14 September 2010, 1994, 1996, 1996, 2003, 1 January 1996, 1994, recent years, 2003, 2003, 2002, three years, five years, 2003, 2003, a period of, two years, 2003, 2003, 14 February 2003, thirty days, 1996, a period of, two years, each month, fifth day, three years, a period of, 30 days, a period of, 30 days, 1395, 1995, 296 5 2007(7, 1957, Para 11, 1996, 2008, 36, 1994, 2010, the last five decades, 0-6 years, 1961, 1971, 1981, 2001, 2011, 6 years, one year, the year 2010, 31 December 2011

ORG: Court, Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection, the Appropriate Authority or Authorized Officer, Popatrao Tarte, Gynecologist, Maternity and Surgical Hospital, Genetic clinic/Ultrasound Clinic, Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Rules, the Appropriate Authority, The Appropriate Authority, Gynecologist, the Appropriate Authority, The Appropriate Authority, the District Collector, the Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, Court, the Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, the Genetic Clinic, Genetic Centre, the General Laboratory, the Genetic Clinic, Ultra Sonography Machine, Genetic Laboratory/Genetic, the Division Bench, the District Collector, Appellate Authority, Court, the Appropriate Authority under Section 30, Additional Government Pleader, the Central Government, House, Parliament, Parliament, the Appropriate Authority, the Statement of Objects &, Genetic Counselling Centres, Genetic Laboratories, The Statement of Objects, inter alia, Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse, Government, State, Parliament, Genetic Counselling Centre, Genetic Laboratory, Genetic Clinic, Genetic Counselling Centre, Genetic Clinic, Centre, Laboratory of Clinic, Genetic Counselling Centre, Genetic Clinic, Diagnostic Techniques, the Appropriate Authority, the State Medical Council, Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, Genetic Counselling Centre, Genetic Clinic, Authority, Genetic Counselling Centre, Genetic Laboratory, Genetic Clinic, Authority, Central Government, House, Houses, the Central Government, Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection, Genetic Centre, the Genetic Clinic, Appropriate Authority, Every Genetic Centre, Ultrasound Clinic, the Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, The Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, The Appropriate Authority, Genetic Counselling Centre, Genetic Laboratory, Genetic Clinic, Imaging Centre or, Ultrasound Clinic, Genetic Laboratory/Genetic Clinic/Genetic Counselling Centre, Parliament, Legislature, the Statement of Objects, Parliament, each House of Parliament, Parliament, Houses, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Tata Engineering, Locomotive Company Ltd, P.S.G. College of Technology,3 Pali Devi v. Chairman, Managing Committee,4, Gujrat Pradesh Panchayat, the Supreme Court, House, Parliament, AIR 1995 SC, AIR 1996, AIR 1957, SC, Apex Court, Statement of Objects, Dadasaheb, Dadasaheb, Lata Mangeshkar Medical Foundation, ICU, Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection, Court, the Appropriate Authority or Authorized Officer, Additional Government Pleader, National, Additional Government Pleader :-, Courts of the Judicial Magistrate, the Metropolitan Magistrates, Criminal Cases, the Principal District Judges, State, State of Goa, the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, the Metropolitan Magistrates

GPE: Dadasaheb, L.J., Dadasaheb, Clause, Pimpri, Bombay, Dadasaheb, Beed District, Kolhapur District, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai

PERSON: Kolhapur, Law, L.J. 110, Nargolkar, Reasons, Reasons, fluid........, Reasons, Gram Panchayat, P. Kasilingam v., Supp, Leelavati Bai v. State, Reasons, L.J. 110, Sagar A. Mane, S.R.Nargolkar, Uday Warunjikar

NORP: Rules, Rules, Rules, Genetic, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, No.of

PRODUCT: Amendment Act 14 of 2003, 521, Districts

WORK_OF_ART: Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Amendment Act

FAC: Genetic Centre

TIME: under this Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //