U.K.Samal Vs. Lokayukt Organisation

Decided On : Apr-29-2011

Court : Madhya Pradesh

LAW: Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, Section 13(1)(d, Section 13(2, Section 10, Section 13(1)(d, the PC Act, Section 7, Section 8(c, Section 12, Section 3, Section 3, Section 4(1).&rdquo, Section 3, Section 8, Section 9 and Section 10, Section 13, Section 7, Section 7, Section 7, Section 7, Section 7, Section 7, section 13, Section 4, Section 4 of the Act, Section 4, Section 7, Section 7, Section 7, Section 133 and Section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (, Section 9, Section 17, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2(h, Section 4 of the Act, Section 9(1)(a, the PC Act, Section 7, Section 12, Section 12, section 10, Section 7, Section 7, Section 154, Section 13, Section 13(3, Section 13-A. (ii, Section 154, Section 154, Section 156 of the Code, Section 8, Section 10, Section 12, Chapter XXXVI

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 100, two, 13(2, 4., only 28, 2, 1, 2, 6., 8, 1, 226, 9, 10, 3, 11, only two, 1, 25, twenty five, 1-a, 1).&rdquo, 12, 3, 13, 1-a, 2, 2, 14, 15, 16, 1, 17, 19, 20, 12.Report, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 3, 4, 6, 3, 4, 21, 2, 22, 325, 23, 2, 34, more than one, one, 24, 2008)14, 337, 26, 27, 1, 2)…&hellip, 3, 1, 4, 28, 29, 30, 1, 37, 32, 33, 34

PERSON: Lokayukt, No.45/99, U.K. Samal, Purchase, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, S.12, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Rajendra Singh Chouhan, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, W.P. No.16863/2007(vi, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Adhiniyam, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Adhiniyam, Lokayukt, Lokayukta, Lokayukt, Adhiniyam, Adhiniyam, wherein, Lokayukt, Adhiniyam, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, S.12, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Adhiniyam, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Subject, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, enquire&rdquo, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Madhya Pradesh, enquire&rdquo, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Adhiniyam, Adhiniyam, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Adhiniyam, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, UpLokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Up-Lokayukt, Lokayukt, UpLokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Adhiniyiam, Adhiniyam, Lokayukt, Bench, Lalita Kumari, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukta, Lokayukta, Lokayukta, Lokayukta, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Singh Badal v. State of, Lokayukt, Lokayukt, Adhiniyam

DATE: 1981, 1988, 16/10/2007, 28/2/1995, 23/5/1996, the year 1996, 12/7/2007, 7/8/2007, the year 2004, 11 years, 12.7.2007, 1281, 1998, mid 70’s, the year 1975, April 1981, September 1981, Section 9(1)(a, 1984, 1984, 1947, 2003, 20.05.2003, 1981, 1982, 1947, Rule 2(iv, Section 9(1)(a, three months of the date, annually, annual, annual, 1979, Section 154(1, Section 154(1, 1950, 1952, five years, the year 1996, 12/7/2007, 11 years

LOC: the Lokayukt Sangathan, Vineet Narain’s

ORG: SPE, Adhiniyam, FIR, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Narsingh Mandal, M.P. State Road Transport Corporation, the Indian Administrative Service, Corporation, W.P. No.16863/2007TELCO, Tata Engineering, Locomotive Co. Ltd., Chassis, motorbus, Automobile Corporation Goa Limited (“ACGL&rdquo, M.P. Chronicle, the heading “MPSRTC, Rs.35.24, MPSRTC, ACGL Goa, Corporation, Gwalior and Indore, order:- “I, SPE, SPE, SPE, FIR, the Board of Directors, Corporation, Chairman’s, the State Government, Buses, ACGL, Corporation, Rs.35.24, Corporation, ACGL, a Public Limited Company, TELCO, Goa Government, UTI, Goa and Gwalior, W.P., Transport, the State Government, Transport, Goa and Gwalior, Higher Judicial Services of M.P., SPE, Adhiniyam, FIR, W.P., no.2 SPE, the Apex Court, Bar Council of Kerala, AIR 1999, the Supreme Court, FIR, the Supreme Court, Vineet Narain v. Union of India, CBI, the Central Government, Department, CBI, W.P., Special Public Prosecutor, FIR, the State Administrative Reforms Commission, the State Vigilance Commission, the State Vigilance Commission, ARC, the Vigilance Commission, ARC, the Government of India, the M.P. Legislative Assembly, Assembly, W.P., the Union Government, the State Government, The Lokayukt Organization, the Vigilance Commission, OBJECT “An Act, the Supreme Court, Court, House, W.P., Learned Senior Counsel, Legislature, information&rdquo, W.P., the State Legislature, Adhiniyam, W.P., the Madhya Pradesh Special Police Establishment, Superintendence, State, the State Government, Special Police Establishment, information&rdquo, W.P., Madhya Pradesh Lokayukta Evam UpLokayukta (Investigation) Rules, the Madhya Pradesh Special Police Establishment Act, information&rdquo, W.P., the Rules &, SPE, the Superintendence of Investigation, the Madhya Pradesh SPE, information&rdquo, information&rdquo, information&rdquo, W.P. No.16863/200718, Learned Senior Counsel, Adhiniyam, W.P., the State Government, the State Government, the State Legislative Assembly, Learned Senior Counsel, Section 2 W.P., SPE, The Apex Court, M.P. Special Police Establishment, State of M.P. (, AIR 2005 SC, the Office of the Lokayukta, the Supreme Court, Shri P.P. Tiwari, Superintendent of Police, Court, the Supreme Court, A.P., Coke, W.P., Court, SPE, SPE, the Apex Court, Govt, U.P., W.P. No.16863/200725, the Legal Advisor, Adhiniyam, W.P., Divisional Vigilance Committee, State, Central Government, Emphasis, SPE, FIR, SPE, SPE, the Apex Court, W.P., SC, Section 157 thereof &hellip, Codes, enquiry:&ndash, W.P., the Public Servants Inquiries Act, the Commission of Inquiry Act

GPE: LA, Babu, India, Babu

PRODUCT: Lokayukt, Ombudsman, M.P. Act No.20 of, Lokayukt, Lokayukt

NORP: Verghese, Rules

EVENT: M.P. Act No.19

WORK_OF_ART: The Superintendence, Legal

TIME: under this Act

ORDINAL: first, first