Employees Provident Fund Organization Vs. Rollwell Forge Ltd and anr.

Decided On : Jun-15-2011

Court : Gujarat

LAW: Section 7A of the Employees' Provident Funds, Section 7(Q, Section 7(A, Section 7(O, Section 8(F, Section 8(B, Section 7A. Section 7(I, section 1, section 3, section 7B, section 14B, Section 8 of the Act, section 1, section 3, section 14B, Section 7-A of the Act, the Civil Procedure Code, Order 41 Rule 5 of, Order 41 Rule 5, Section 7-O, Section 7-A, Article 226, Article 226, Section 7-I of the Act, Article 226

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 30.1.2001, 11.2.2009, 4., two, 5, 19.2.2009, zero, 6, 2.5.2009, 8., 9, 10, 11, 12, two, 180, 313, 163, 300, 13, 14, 15, 16, 1, 1, 17, 1, 3, 4, 1, 5, 7C, 18, seventy-five, 19, 20, 3, 4, 1, 7B, 7C, 21, 22, 3, 1, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 1.5.2009, 28

ORG: the Employees Provident Fund Organization, the Appellant (Original Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Section 7 Clause 'A' of the Act, the Respondent herein &, Original Petitioner, Appellant, Learned Single, Learned Single, Counsel for the Appellant, Rs.20,37,041.07p, the High Court, Learned Single, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Learned Counsel, Bombay High Court, Karnataka High Court, Driving Centre Ltd., Union of India, ELT, Bom.) and Charak Pharmaceuticals v. Union of India, ELT, Counsel for the Respondent &, Counsel for, Counsel for, Tribunal, The Central Provident Fund, Additional Central Provident Fund, Provident Fund, Regional Provident Fund, Appeals, the Central Government, the Central Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Government, the Central Government, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Appeal, Appeal, Court, Legislature, Appellate, Court, Tribunal, this High Court, this High Court, Appeal, Appellate, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court

DATE: 1.5.2009, 1952, April, 2001 to January, 2007, April, 2001 to January, 2007, 2009, 30.1.2009, 11.2.2009, 23.3.2009, 25.3.2009, 2005, 2004, 60 days, 14, 2009

LOC: Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Respondent, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single

PERSON: Appellant, Appellant, Niral R. Mehta, Kishore M. Paul, Counsel

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

NORP: Rules

GPE: Single, Counsel, Counsels, assessee

WORK_OF_ART: Scheme

PERCENT: 75%, 75%

ORDINAL: Secondly

FAC: Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant