Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Km. Indu Mishra Vs. Union of India and ors.

Decided On : Nov-26-2010

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 3, the National Security Act, Article 22, Constitution, Section 364 IPC, Section 10 of the Act, Section 3, the National Security Act, Section 3, Section 3, Section 3, Section 8, Section 8, Section 14 of the Act, Section 21, Section 3, Section 3, List 1, List 3, Constitution, Section 3, Section 21, Central Act, Section 21, the National Security Act, Article 22(5, Constitution, the COFEPOSA Act and PITNDPS Act, Section 3 of the COFEPOSA Act, the PIT NDPS Act, the COFEPOSA Act, the National Security Act, the Preventive Detention Act, Section 3, the National Security Act, Section 3, Section 8, the National Security Act, The COFEPOSA Act, the PITNDPS Act, Section 3, Section 3 of the COFEPOSA Act, the PITNDPS Act, ii)an, the National Security Act, Section 3(4, Section 3, Section 8, The COFEPOSA Act, the PITNDPS Act, Section 3, the COFEPOSA Act, the PITNDPS Act, Section 3, the COFEPOSA Act, the PITNDPS Act, Section 3, the National Security Act, the COFEPOSA Act, the PITNDPS Act, Section 3, the COFEPOSA Act, the PITNDPS Act the Central Government, Section 11, the COFEPOSA Act and Section 12, the PITNDPS Act, Section 3 of National Security Act, Section 3 of COFEPOSA Act, the Maharashtra Act, the National Security Act, Section 3 of the Act, Section 21, Section 14, Section 8, section 14, Section 3, Section 3, Article 22, Constitution Bench, the Maharastra Act, Article 22, Constitution, Section 3, ACC 33, Section 21, Section 21, the National Security Act, Section 3, Section 2, Section 8, Constitution, the National Security Act, the National Security Act, Section 3, Section 3, Section 21, Section 11, the COFEPOSA Act, Internal Security Act, Maharashtra Act, Article 22(5, Constitution, National Security Act, the National Security Act, Section 3, the National Security Act, Article 22

CARDINAL: 1, 41, 2, 5, 2)If, 2, 3., 22/23, 50, 23.1.2002, 26/27, 3.2.2002, One, 4, 5, 4, 4, 5, 6, 5, 7, 4, 4, 6, 2, 3, 2, 7, 3, 3, 2, one, 8, 4, 3, 4, 3, 9, 8, 1, 10, 14, 3, 12, 13, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 14, 5, 3, 5, 2, 646, 15, 1, 195, 8, 4, 16, 5, 2, 621, 5, 10, 2, 17, 641, 9, 4, 18, 19, 482, 20, 4, 38, 19, 3, 4, 1, 34, 1, 2, 2, 4, 2, 22, 23, 8), 2, 1, 1, 2, 5, 5, 98, 24, 25, 1, 3, 41, 883, 26, 3, 45, 5, 569, 27, 97, 2, 420, 198, 5, 4, 8), 5, 613, 7, 2, 621, 12, 211, 1, 295, 1, 195, 2, 28, 641, 35, 29, 102, 75, 567, 659, 30, 31, 3, 2, 1, 5, 32, 3, 4, 33, 10, 7, 2, 8, 4, 5, 34, 5, 10, 10, 17, 2, 145, 36, 10, 8, 5, 1, 2, 5, 2, 3., 4, 39

ORG: Court, Court, State, ACC, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, the District Magistrate/Detaining Authority, Apex Court's, Kamlesh Kumar's, no.1, the District Magistrate (Detaining Authority, the State Government, the District Magistrate/Detaining Authority, the State Government, the District Magistrate/Detaining Authority, the State Government, the Division Bench, P.S. Muthiganj, Km, Smt, P.S. Muthiganj, Allahabad, Security Guard, Sultanpur - Pratapgarh, Security Guard, Km, Jagdamba Prasad Pande, Dr. Agarwal, Dr. Agarwal, No.9038057095, No.27348, Assembly Election, the State Government, State Government, Home, the Advisory Board, the Advisory Board, Advisory Board, Central Government, Home and Internal Security Department, Government of India, State, Advisory Board, a High Court, Parliament, Parliament, an Advisory Board, an Advisory Board, The Central Government, the State Government, State, District Magistrate, District Magistrate, the State Government, District Magistrate, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, a State Government, the National Security (Second Amendment) Act, Defence, Foreign Affairs, the Security of India, State, State, AIR 1985 SC 1082, Advisory Board, State, Advisory Board, Tribunal, State, the State Government, the Central Government, Union of India, the Supreme Court, Kamlesh Kumar Ishwar, Patel v. Union of India, A.C. Razia v. Government, Union of India, the Supreme Court, Allahabad, Court, the District Magistrate, the State Government, the State Government, the District Magistrate, The State Government, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the State Government, the State Government, the District Magistrate, the State Government, the Supreme Court, Prevention of Dangerous Activities of, Boottleggers, Drugg-Offenders, Forest-Offenders, Immoral Traffic Offenders and, the State Government, Union of India &, Ors, the Supreme Court, the Central Government, the State Government, The Supreme Court, the Central Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Central Government, a State Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Vide, the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, the District Magistrate, the Commissioner of Police, the State Government, the State Government, the Maintenance of Internal Security Act, i)the Central Government, the Central Government, iii)the State Government, the state Government, the Supreme Court, the district Magistrate, the Commissioner of Police, the District Magistrate, the Commissioner of Police, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the State Government, Government, State Government, Government, the Apex Court, SC, the Supreme Court, the State Government, the State Government under Section 8, Detaining Authority, Detaining Authority, the State Government, the State Government the Detaining Authority, Bombay General Clauses Act, the Detaining Authority, the State Government, the State Government, Court, Court, COFEPOSA, Vide Para 8, J.T. Report, the Detaining Authority, the State Government, the Detaining Authority, Court, The Division Benches, L.J. 3652, the State Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Court, the District Magistrate, the Detaining Authority, the Detaining Authority, the Supreme Court, State, Maharastra, Santosh Kumar Acharya, Court, ACC, the District Magistrate, The District Magistrate (Detaining Authority, the State Government, the District Magistrate, the State Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, Court, the Apex Court, Santosh Shankar Acharya's, the State Government, the Apex Court, District Magistrate, the State Government, District Magistrate, Sitapur &, the Division Benches, Court, the District Magistrate, the State Government, the Supreme Court, the State Government, AIR 1970, SC, AIR 1974 SC 2154, Vimal Chand, AIR 1979 SC 1501, State of, AIR 1981 SC 1621, Smt, Ibrahim Bacchu Bafan, Gujrat, AIR 1985 SC 697, Smt, Gracy, AIR 1991, AIR 1991, SC, Prakash Bahal v. Union of India, Kamlesh Kumar Ishwar, Patel v. Union of India, SC, Usha Agarwal v. Union of India, Union of India, Union of India, Black's Law Dictionary, U.P., AIR 1969, SC, P.L. Lekhpal v. Union of India, AIR 1967 SC, AIR, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, The District Magistrate, the State Government, The District Magistrate/ Detaining Authority, the State Government under Section 3, the Central Government, the Central Government, a State Government, a State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Union of India &, COFEPOSA, Government, COFEPOSA, the State Government, the State Government, District Magistrate &, the Supreme Court, State, The Supreme Court, Veeramani, the State authority, the State Government, the Central Government, Ibrahim Bachu Bafan's, the State Government, the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Gamblers, Immoral Traffic Offenders and, the State Government, The Supreme Court, Santosh Shankar Acharya's, the Bombay High Court, the State Government, The Supreme Court, the Detaining Authority, the State Government, the Advisory Board, the Advisory Board, The Supreme Court, Union of India, the District Magistrate/ Detaining Authority, the District Magistrate/ Detaining Authority, the State Government, Ministry of Home Affairs, Court, State, Santosh Kumar Acharya, Santosh Kumar Acharya, Court, the Supreme Court, Sri Anand Hanmathsa Katara (Supra, Karnataka Act, the National Security, The District Magistrate/ Detaining Authority, the District Magistrate/ Detaining Authority, the State Government, the State Government, The District Magistrate/ Detaining Authority, the State Government

PERSON: Ram Lal, Deepak Agrawal, Child Specialist, Kamlesh Narain Mishra, Ashok Mishra, Ashok Singh, Dinesh Tewari @ Pappu Shooter, Sandeep Singh, Deepak Agarwal, Ashok Mishra, Agrawal, Indu Mishra, Agrawal, Savita Agrawal, Deepak Agarwal, Agarwal, Indu Mishra, Indu Mishra, Dinesh Tewari @ Pappu Shooter, No.9838054138, Ashok Mishra, Indu Mishra, Ashok Mishra, No.9838054138, Agarwal, Indu Mishra, Dinesh Tewari @ Pappu Shooter, Sandeep Singh, Naini, Shri Prem Prakash Yadav, Shri Sudhir Mehrotra, Addl, Rajasthan v. Shamsher Singh, Haradhon Saha v. State, Senthil Kumar, Art.22(5, Art.22, Chaya Ghosal, Geeta Ram Das v. State, Manni Lal v. Superintendent, Naini, AWC, Manni Lal, Tamil Nadu, Goondas, Ishwardas Patel, Santosh Shankar Acharya, Nawab Dulha v. Union, Kumar Mishra v. Superintendent, Gorakhpur, Jai Prakash Shastri, Mohammad Jaid v., Sushil Singh v., D.M. Kheri, Prem Prakash Yadav, Hardan Saha v. State of, Kumar Kundalia, Amir Shad Khan, L. Himingiana, Nutan J. Patel v. S.V. Prasad, Amanulla Khan Kudeatalla, Khan Pathan v. State, Santosh Shankar Acharya, A.C. Razia v. Govt, Harshala Santosh Patil v. State of Mah, Sneh Khemka, Shri Yadav, Manni Lal v. Supdt, Sheshdhar Mishra v. Supdt, Rai Bahadur, Sunil S. Gatate v. State, Shri Yadav, P. Ramanatha Aiyar's, Arun Shanker v. State, Bidya Deo Barma v. Distt, Magistrate Tripura, Shri Yadav, Hira Bai v. State of, Shri Yadav, Shri Sudheer Mehrotra, Addl, Ishwardas Patel, Shankar Acharya, Santosh Shankar Acharya, Veeramani v. State, Tamil Nadu, Veeramani Case, Amir Shad Khan, L. Hmingliana, Umar Bakshi v. Union, Amir Shad Khan's, Art.22, Gundas, Art.22, R. Keshava v. M.B. Prakash, Chaya Ghoshal, R. Keshava v. M.B. Prakash

GPE: U.P., New Delhi, Allahabad, Allahabad, Allahabad, Central Jail, India, North Block, New Delhi, India, Bengal, Art.22, Tamil, Harish, Kerala, Veeramani v. State, Kamlesh, JT, J.T.report, New Delhi, Muzaffarnagar, New Delhi, Pankaj, Kumar Chakrabarty, West Bengal, Kirit, Anand, Kerala, JT, Gujrat, Kerala, Harish, Central Jain, U.P., M.P., Kamlesh, Idrish

DATE: 2000, 1715, 2002, 44, 1117, 12 days, 22.4.2003, 2002, daily, 3 weeks, three months, three months, three months, 1980, three months, three months, more than twelve days, five days, later than ten days, twelve days, fifteen days', later than five days, later than ten days, 1987, 10 of 1987, 1984, twelve months, 22, three months, three months, 1975, 1999, 2008, 1995, 2004, 2005, 1975, 1985, more than twelve days, twelve days, 1994, 1982, 1995, 1980, 1950, 1971, more than twelve days, 1950, 1971, more than twelve days, twelve days, 10 days, 1980, 2000, 12 days, 2002, 2002, 2000, 28th May, 2001, 20th May, 2001, 23rd May, 2001, 23rd May, 2001, 2002, 2003, 12 days, 1981, 1991, 1995, 1995, 1999, 2000, 2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2004, 1985, 1985, 1997, 2000, 3709, 2010, 1984 ALJ 1031, 1987, 1980, 1974, 1980, 12 days, 1980, 2006, 2000, 1994, 1991, 39, 1980, 1985, 1980, 35, 2001, 2005, 2003, 37, 1980, 12 days, 2002, 44, 1117, 1980, 1985, 1980, 38, 1980, 12 days

NORP: Idrish, Maharashtra, Idrish, Idrish, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Idrish, Maharashtra, Maharashtra

TIME: the night, about 10.10 p.m., about 10.30 p.m., 3.10 a.m., the night, 11.00 p.m.

LOC: Mohalla Unchamandi, the Central Government. (2

PRODUCT: Maruti Zen Car, Maruti Car, iv)an, 323, 908, the Full Bench, the Full Bench

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India provides:-, the Constitution of India, Sixth Edition, Shri Anand Hanumathsa Katare v., the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India

ORDINAL: first, first

EVENT: General Clauses Act, General Clauses Act, the Preventive Detention Act, Supp SCC 195

QUANTITY: Raziya

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //