Acto. Vs. M/S Eicher Limited, Alwar.

Decided On : Mar-31-2011

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

LAW: Section 78(5, Tax World 13, Section 78(5, Section 2(42, the RST Act, Section 78(5, Section 6(2, the CST Act, Section 81, the RST Act, Rule 53, Section 81, the RST Act, Section 81, the RST Act, Section 78, Section 78, Section 22A(7, the RST Act, Section 78(5, the RST Act, Article 323B, the RST Act, Section 22A, section 22A(7, Constitution, Article 286(1)(b, Constitution, article 286(1)(b, the Entry Tax Act, section 3 of the Act, Section 78(5, Section 78(5, Rule 53, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286, Article 286 of the Constitution, Article, the List II, Constitution, the Entry Tax Act, Constitution, article 286(1)(b, Constitution, article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(a, Constitution, Section 4, Section 3, article 286(1)(a, the AET Act, section 81, Section 78, section 81, Section 81, Section 78(5

CARDINAL: 1, No.2 to 9, 69, 5602, 1108/21, No.2, 9, two, 269, 29, 8.2.2001, 2001CIRCULARSome, 27.6.1999, 140, 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 2007)9, 528, 115, 591, two, 115, 29, 29, 8.2.2001, 8.2.2001, 29, 29, 24, two, 24, only three, 24, 29, 52, 52, 52, two, two, 115, 591, 2, 29, 8.2.2001, 1.5.2008, 1.5.2008, 9, 4

ORG: the Tax Board, these Appellate Authorities, Sale Invoice, Tax Board, Court, M/s Jitendra and Co., Section 78(2, dtd.8.5.2002 inter alia, Bilty No.72151, ST-18A, Sales Tax Tribunal, CTO V/s, the Appellate Authorities, Court, Counsel for the Revenue, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Guljag Industries V/s CTO, Court, Tax Board, SC, AO, Section 78(2, Section 78(2, ST-18A, Court, ST-18A, Commercial Taxes Department of Government of Rajasthan, Circular, State, the Ministry of Commerce, Government of India, the Commercial Taxes Department, Circular, State, State, the Ministry of Commerce Government of India, the Ministry of Commerce as Importer, State, the Check-Posts/Document Collection Centres, Court, State, States of the Union of India, the State Government, the Central Sales Tax Act, the State Government, State, State, the State Govt, Original, Duplicate, State, the State Government, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, ST-18A, the Appellate Authorities, Court, Rajasthan Tax Tribunal, CTO V/s, the Rajasthan Tax Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Primus Imaging Pvt, State, State, the State Government, the Assam Entry Tax Act, State, Legislature, State, the Assam Entry Tax Act, the Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods, the Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods Into Local Areas Act, State, Legislature, State, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Guljag Industries V/s CTO, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Section 78(2, the Hon'ble Apex Court, justified.8, the Apex Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Guljag Industries, Circular, the Commercial Taxes Department, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Commercial Taxes Department, the Commercial Taxes Department, the Ministry of Commerce, Department, Circular, Department, Hon'ble Apex Court, Guljag Industries, the Hon'ble Apex Court, AO, ST-18A, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Guljag Industries, The Hon'ble Apex Court, Guljag Industries, Guljag Industries, the State of Andhra Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Telugu speaking Andhra Pradesh, Hon'ble Apex Court, Guljar Industries, Court, Primus Imaging Pvt. Ltd., Gauhati High Court, the State Legislature, State, the Union Government, the State Government, the State Government, State, the Assam Entry Tax Act, Court, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, the Assam Entry Tax Act, State, State, Legislature, State, the Kerala High Court, State, Kerala High Court, Gauhati High Court, Primus Imaging Pvt. Ltd., Kerala Tax on Entry of Goods, the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, State, State, State, the State Government, Court, State, State, Hon'ble Apex Court, the Commercial Taxes Department, Rajasthan Value Added Tax Rules, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Guljag Industries, State, the Commercial Taxes Department

PERSON: dtd.6.8.2002, Bill of Entry, Transport Receipt, R.B. Mathur, Vivek Singhal, Kar-Niti, Vivek Singhal, VST, Fr, William Fernandez V/s State, William Fernandez v. State, William Fernandez v. State, R.B. Mathur, Hindi, Schedule, William Fernandez v. State, William Fernandez v. State, Vivek Singhal, Rule 53(4),which

GPE: ST, Japan, ST, Japan, Japan, Mumbai, Mumbai, Alwar, Mumbai, Alwar, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, India, Kerala, Kerala, India, Assam, India, Kerala, Kerala, India, Japan, Japan, Mumbai, Alwar, the State of Rajasthan, the State of Rajasthan, ST, India, India, the State of Rajasthan, India, India, India, Fr, Kerala, abroad.12, Kerala, Single, the State of Rajasthan, ST, Mumbai

ORDINAL: first, Firstly, seventh

DATE: 72152, 1998, Para 29, 1994, February 8, ST 18A, 1994, 1994, the year 1999, 1956, or(iii, Rs.10,000/-, ST 18A, 1994, 1998, 1951, 1994, 1999, 2001, 2001, 1999, 1994, 1994, the year 1999, the year 1999, ST 18A, para 29, 2001, 54, 52, 1956, 2001, section 2(1)(h, 1999, 1994, 1994, ST 18A, 2006, the year 1999, columns No.2, 8.2.2001.16

NORP: inter-State, inter-State, contra, Gauhati, Indians, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State

EVENT: ST 18A, Tax World 13, ST 18A, ST 18A, ST 18A, ST 18A, ST 18A, ST 18A

LOC: Single, Single

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India, Schedule to the Constitution of India, the Constitution of India

MONEY: 286