Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande Alias Handege Vs.

Decided On : Mar-29-2011

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Indian Succession Act, Section 217, Section 269, Section 269, The Succession Act, the Succession Act, Section 268, Section 295, Section 266, Section 269, Section 269(2, Section 269(2, The Succession Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Succession Act, The Succession Act, Section 269(2, the Indian Succession Act, Section 211, Section 213, Section 216, Section 220, Section 222, Section 227, Chapter II, Section 247, Section 261, Chapter IV of Part IX, Section 264, Section 266, Section 269, Section 276, Section 278, Section 291, Section 307, Section 317, Section 319, the Indian Succession Act, the Indian Succession Act, Chapter IV of Part IX, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 295, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 266, Section 268, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 269, Section 269, Section 268, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 269, Section 269, Section 269, Section 269, Section 269, Section 269(2, Section 247, Section 269, Section 266, Section 266

PERSON: Sushila Vithalrao Hande, Caveat, D.K.Deshmukh, Rupali Mehta, Tina, Sain, Rupali Mehta, Rupali Mehta, Rupali Mehta, D.K.Deshmukh, Rupali Mehta, Mohammadan, Sikh, Order XXXIX, Order XXXIX, Rupali Mehta's, Sam Shoff, Shiraz Byramji Anklesaria,2, Kamta, Jasjit Singh4, Vijaya C. Gurshaney,5, Kumar Birla, Rajendra Singh, Mohammadan, Sikh, Sikh, Sam Shroff, Shiraz Byramji Anklesaria,7, Mohammadan, Sikh, Will, Atula Bala Dasi, Dwarkadas Kalliandas,9, Dhanraj Jain, Eknath Vithal Ogale,10

DATE: 2 October 2002, 1925, 1908, 247, 1908, 1908, 1908, 1993, 2003, 2008, 19258, 1925, 1925, 1925, 1908, 1908, 1908, the 9 1932, 70010

PRODUCT: Appellant, Calcutta 561, Appellant

ORG: Fifth Respondents, Fifth Respondents, Fifth Respondents, Court, the Civil Court, the Civil Court, Learned Single, the Testamentary Petition, Letters of Administration, Plaintiff, Letters of Administration, Court, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Court, the Testamentary Court, Legislature, Legislature, Sections 192, a Testamentary Suit, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Original Side Rules, Court, the Testamentary Court, Letters of Administration, The Testamentary Court, the Testamentary Court, the Civil Court, Court, Court, Legislature, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Testamentary Court, Court, Court, Court, Letters of Administration, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court of Probate, SC, the Probate Court, Delhi Development Authority, the Supreme Court, Testamentary Court, Probate, Letters of Administration, the Supreme Court, the Probate Court, the Probate Court, Court of Justice, Court, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Court, Letters of Administration, Court, Court, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Court, the Court of the District Judge, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, State, Letters of Administration, the High Court, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Court, the Letters of Administration, Court, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Letters of Administration, Court, Section 268, the Court of the District Judge, Letters of Administration, Court, Court, Letters of Administration, Legislature, Legislature, Sections 266, Court, Legislature, Sections 266, Court, Court, Appellant, Court, Court, the Civil Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, the Calcutta High Court, Court, Pandurang Shamrao Laud, Reliance, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, BLR, AIR 1995 SC, Appellant, Court

CARDINAL: 1 2006(6, 2, 2, 193, 211, 213, 222, 251, 253, 261, 264, 266, 268, 269, 273, 276, 291, 295, 307, 308, 317, 318, 319, 332, 368, only two, 2 2007(2, 5, 3, 280, 2, 7, 4, 1, 217, 1, 1908.11, 269, 1, 1908.14, 7 2007(2, 268, 1, 2, 2, one, 2, 268, 1, 1, 1, 266, 268, 2, one, 2, 268, 15, 2, 8, 35

GPE: C.R., the Learned Single, Ishwardeo, Singh, Chiranjilal, Krishna, Jaina, Muhammadan, Jaina, Jaina, Nirupama, Mansukhlal

NORP: Hindu, Buddhist, Indian, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, Hindu, Buddhist, Indian, Christian, Hindu, Buddhist, an Indian, Christian

WORK_OF_ART: The Code of Civil Procedure, The Succession Act

FAC: Sections 266

LOC: the District Judge, the District Judge

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //