Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ayushman Pandey. Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr.

Decided On : Mar-28-2011

Court : Jharkhand Ranchi

LAW: section 482 Code, section 12, the Act XLIII, section 3 of the Act, Section 23, section 19, section 22, section 20 of the Act, section 25, Section 2(a, Section 2(a, the d Act, Section 2(f, Section 2(s, Section 25, section 25, the Special Marriage Act, section 12, section 25, section 12

CARDINAL: 1, 772, No.2, 6.5.2010, Twenty, One, 18 to 22, at least two, one, 35, 30.3, 156, 2010.The, 15 and 17, 772, 2010.There

ORG: Court, the SDJM Ranchi, CJM Ranchi, the Protection of Women, Brahmin(Hindu, Neturis Block, the State Bank of India, House, S.P. Jain Centre, P.P Compound, Protection, the Civil Judge(Junior Division, Principal Judge Family Court Ranchi, Protection of Women, SDJM, SDJM, the Protection of Women, no.2, the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, the SDJM Ranchi, SDJM

DATE: 2010, 2005, 8.12.2008, 1954, the very day, every day, 31st March, 2009, 2009, 2009, 2005, 13.9.2010, 8.12.2008, 28.5.2010, 2005

NORP: Muslim, Title

PERSON: Ayushman Pandey, Bengal, Jamshedpur, Ayushman Pandey, Jamshedpur, Anil Kumar, Anil Kumar, Delip Zerath, Zerath

FAC: the Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, the SDJM Ranchi, Complaint Case

PRODUCT: Surgeon, Rs.23,000/-

GPE: Singapore, Act.3, Purulia, Purulia, M.T.S., Purulia, O.P.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //