Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Assistant Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. M/S Makkad Plastic Agencies

Decided On : Mar-29-2011

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 29(7, Section 84, the Tax Assessing Officer, the Tax Assessing Officer, Section 37, Section 86, Section 37, Section 37 of the Act of, the Tax Assessing Officer, Section 37, Section 37, Section 37, Section 154, Section 263, the Income Tax Act, Section 154, Section 263, the Income Tax Act, Section 154, Section 263, Section 154, Section 263, Section 263, Section 154, the Income Tax Act, Section 22, Section 37 of the Act of, Section 37

CARDINAL: 1, 3., 4., 29.03.2005, 5., 29.03.2005, two, 29.03.2005, 6., 29.03.2005, two, 8, 9, 10.It, 11.In, 22.01.2009, 1, 12.The, 29.03.2005, two, 13, 14.The, 2, 8, 12, 3, two, two, 9, 18, 20.In

ORG: the Rajasthan High Court, S.B. Civil, the High Court, Revision Petition, the Rajasthan Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, Assessing, the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax, Commercial Tax Department, the Appellate Authority, the Rajasthan Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, The Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, the Rajasthan Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, the Taxation Board a Revision Petition, the High Court, The High Court, the Taxation Board, the Revision Petition, the High Court, the Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, an Amendment Application, the Taxation Board, Amendment Application, the Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, the Supreme Court, the Rajasthan High Court, the Rajasthan Tax Board, Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, Board, the Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, Income Tax, Court, Court, the Assessing Authority, Court, U.P., the U.P. Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, Court, Kalabharati Advertising, the Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, the Taxation Board, the High Court, the Taxation Board

PERSON: Jodhpur Bench, Ajmer, Bikaner, Bikaner, Ajmer, Bikaner, Bikaner, levy penalty, Bikaner, Jodhpur Bench, Bhopal v. Ralson Industries Ltd., Upper Doab Sugar Mills Ltd., Hemant Vimalnath Narichania

DATE: 2010, 22.01.2009, 13.05.2008, the Assessment Year 2001-02, 1994, 1994, 13.05.2008, 1994, 22.01.2009, 22.01.2009, 13.05.2008, 1994, 22.01.2009, 22.01.2009, 22.01.2009, 1994, 22.01.2009, 13.05.2008., 13.05.2008, 1994, 13.05.2008, 1994, 1994, 1994, 2007, 16.We, 2000, 1995, 2010, 1994, 22.01.2009, 1994, 22.01.2009

MONEY: 10 per cent, 8 per cent, 2 per cent, 2 per cent, 8 per cent, 10 per cent, 10 per cent, 8 per cent

PRODUCT: Para 8

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //