Kusum Jain. Vs. Vinay Kumar AgarwalA.

Decided On : Mar-07-2011

Court : Kolkata Appellate

LAW: Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 482, Section 357, Section 357(2, Section 138 of The Act, Section 138, the N.I. Act, Section 357 of the Code, Section 357(2, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Section 138, Section 138, Section 141, Section 138, Section 141, the N.I. Act, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357(3, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357, Section 357, Section 421 of the Code, Section 357, Section 421, Section 431, Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure;v, Section 357 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 357.21

CARDINAL: 1, 15,05,000/-, 15,00,000/-, 74, 2010.3, 3, 9.9.10, 986, 5, 138, Fifteen, five thousand, 15,00,000/-, Fifteen, 15,05,000/-, 15,00,000/-, 2, 9.9.2010, 3, 209.6, 2, 1, 10,50,000/-, 15,00,000/-, 10,00,000/-, 15,00,000, 1/4th, 15,00,000/-, 1 Company, 25,000/-(Rs., twenty-five thousand, 2, 2, 2, 2, 15,00,000/-, 15, 3, 2, two, 23.3.2006, 7,50,000, 2, three, 5,00,000/-, Five, 15,05,000/-, 15,00,000/-, 25,000/-, 1, 2, 15,00,000/-, two, 2, 14, 431, 439, 1, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 3, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 5, 15,00,000/-, 2, 10,00,000/-, 2, 3

ORG: Appellate Court, Metropolitan Magistrate, 4th Court, Calcutta, S.I., Court, Court, City Sessions Court, City Sessions Court, Calcutta, the Memo of Appeal, Crl, Court, City Sessions Court, Calcutta, Court, Kusum Jain, S.I., Trial Court, Trial Court, Appellate Court, Appellate Court, the Honble Apex Court, Kotak Mahindra Company Limited, the Honble Court, Appellate Court, the Trial Court, the Honble Apex Court, SC, the Honble Court, Trial Court, Trial Court, Trial Court, Trial Court, Trial Court, Appellate Court, Court, Metropolitan Magistrate, Appellate Court, the Trial Court, Appellate Court, the Honble Apex Court, The High Court, Court, The Honble Court, the High Court, the Honble Court, S.I., Trial Court, the Honble Apex Court, Court, The Honble Apex Court, the Honble Court, the Honble Court, Accused 1 Company, M/S Goodvalue Marketing Co. Ltd., Trial, S.I., S.I., S.I., The Appellate Court, the Appellate Court, the Honble Apex Court, S.I., Trial Court, the Honnle Court, the Trial Court, S.I., S.I., S.I., S.I., the Honble Apex Court, Court, The Honble Court, The Honble Court, Court, Sub Section, Sub Section, The Honble Court, Magistrates, Sub Section, Sub Section, Sub Section, the Honble Court, the Appellate Court, Court, Trial Court, S.I., Trial Court, Appellate Court, Trial Court, Appellate Court, Appellate Court, Trial Court, Court, Appellate Court

DATE: 1999, 3(three) months, 18.8.2010, 1999, Today, 15,05000/-, 3) months, 2007, 2001, three months, three months, one month, one month, monthly, four weeks, three months, one months, one month, two months, one month, three months, two months

PRODUCT: Calcutta

PERSON: LCR Appellant, Sudipta Maitra, S.I., Maitra, Maitra, Dilip S. Dahanukar v., Anr, Dilip S. Dahanukar, Jayamallya Bagchi, Bagchi, Dahanukar, S.I., Bagchi, Maitra, Maitra, Bagchi, justice.10, Dilip S. Dahanukar, Dilip S. Dahanukar, suspended;b, Dilip Dahanukar, Dilip S. Dahanukar, Dilip S. Dhanukar, Dilip S. Dahanukar, Maitra, Dilip S. Dahanukar

FAC: Stanny Felix Pinto v. M/s. Jangid Builders Pvt, Stanny Felix Pinto, Stanny Felix Pinto (Supra, the Dilip S. Dahanukar, Stanny Felix Pinto (Supra

GPE: J.T., Clause

ORDINAL: first, second