Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commercial Taxes Officer, Baran. Vs. M/S Onkarmal Shyam Lal.

Decided On : Oct-21-2010

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

LAW: Section 86, the Declaration Form 18(C, Section 78(5, Section 78(5, Section 78(5, Section 78, Section 78(2, Section 78(5, Section 78(2)(a, Section 78, Section 78(2)(a, Section 78(5, Section 78(5, Section 78(5, Section 78(2)(a, Section 78(5, Act 7 of 2002, Section 78(5, Act 7 of 2002, Act 7 of 2002, Section 22-A(3, Section 22-A(3)].11, Section 78(5

CARDINAL: 1, 30.06.1999, 30.06.1999, 09.08.2004, 17, 70, 2009(1, 30.06.1999, 29, 22-3-2002, one, 5, 22-3-2002, 5, 4, 22-3-2002, 30.06.1999

ORG: petitioner.2, the Rajasthan Tax Board, Section 78(2, Rajasthan Tax Board, the Tax Board, Tax Board, Hon'ble Apex Court, Bajaj Electricals Limited, the Hon'ble Apex Court, the Appellate Authorities, Rajasathan Tax Board, Assessing, the Rajasthan Tax Board, the Apex Court, Bajaj Electricals Limited, the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, Section 78(2, Court, Guljag Industries, Guljag Industries, the Hon'ble Apex Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Rajasthan Tax Board, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Section 78(2, the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, the Hon'ble Apex Court, Guljag Industries, the Rajasthan Tax Board, Assessing

DATE: 1994, 1994, 16.12.2005, 1994, 1994, 22.03.2002, 28, 1994, 1994, 16.12.2005

PERCENT: 30%, 30%

PRODUCT: Rs.60,481/-, 2007)7 SCC 269

PERSON: Ajmer, Assessing Officer, Ajmer

MONEY: Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //