Elgi Equipments Workers and Staff Union and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Decided On : Feb-28-2011

Court : Chennai

LAW: the ESI Act, the ESI Act, the ESI Act, the ESI Act, Section 87, Section 1(4, the ESI Act, Article 21 of the Constitution, the ESI Act, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 21 of the Constitution.10, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 21, Article 19(1)(g, Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Article 21, Article 21 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 21, Article 142, Constitution, Article 136 of the Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301 of the Constitution, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301, Article 21, Article 21, Article 19, Article 19, Article 14, Article 14, Article 21, Article 14, Article 21."19, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 21, Article 21, Article 19, Article 21, the ESI Act, the ESI Act, Article 21, the ESI Act, Chapter VIII, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Article 21

CARDINAL: two, 50, 1, 2, 1100, 583, 9, 2363, 189, as many as 79, 23.12.1996, II, 6 to 8, 6, 10.1, 12.5, 7.1, 7.7, one, 185, 186, 1, 8, 2, 4, 4, 3, 15, 15, 4, 117, 25, 25, 3, 24, 24, 39, 1, 32, 1, 56, seven, one, 1, 251, 13, 13, 1, 21, 23, one, 171, 23.Apart, about 35, 70, 12, 1, 201, 5, 2, 15, 15, 43, 41 to 43, 41, one, 25

ORG: the Union of India, ESI, the Central Government, the Trade Union, Standing Counsel, ESI, ESI, The State Government, Government, ESI, ESI, Management, ESI, State, ESI, ESI, ESI, Karnataka High Court, the Supreme Court, Government, Trade Union, the Karnataka High Court, Indian Express Newspapers, Private Ltd., Union of India, the Division Bench, the Karnataka High Court, Consumer Education, Research Centre v. Union of India, the Karnataka High Court, Scheme, State, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Emphasis, ESI Scheme, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Union Territory, the Supreme Court, State of Punjab, Government, Government, the Supreme Court, Municipal Corporation, Reliance, State, the Supreme Court, Reliance, State, State, AIIMS, State, Government, the Supreme Court, Reliance, Court, State, State, the Supreme Court, State, Reliance, State, the Supreme Court, District Registrar, Collector v. Canara Bank, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Union of India, Reliance, Reliance, Indian Express, AIR 1986, SC, AIR 1978, SC, Court, All India Bank Employees', AIR 1962 SC, EEG, dB., Vertigo, K.Park 'Text Book of Preventive and Social Medicine', 7th Edn, the Supreme High Court, Sound Pollution v. Union of India, UOI, the Supreme High Court, Reliance, the Bombay Rent Act, Division Bench, Court, Court, Government, State, State, State, State, State, the State Government, Reliance, the Central Government, ESI, the Supreme Court, the Right to Health, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State, State, State, AIIMS, Court

DATE: 22.09.2006, 1950, Rs.10,000/-, 10.11.2006, 20.11.2006, the year 1992 to 2001, 31.03.2001, 31.03.2006, 1999, 1997, 1998, 1981, 8, 1997, 11, 1986, 1998, 35, 1978, 25, 1982, 32, 2005, 56, 1989, today, today, 1993, 1966, 2005, 1998, several years, 1947, the day, 32

GPE: Rs.7,500/-, A.Rajamani, Rs.3000/-, India, India, States, Ramsharan Autyanuprasi, AIR, Paragraph, India

ORDINAL: first, second, third, first, third, third, third, third, third, third

PERSON: 01.11.2010, filed.6, Mill, Rs.6500/-, Paragraphs, Sanjay Mohan, Sanjay Mohan, Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Mohinder Singh Chawala, Jan Mohammed Usmanbhai, Ram Lubhaya Bagga, Maneka Gandhi, Maneka Gandhi, Articles 21, Chandra Mohan v. State of U.P, Maneka Gandhi v. Union, Bench, P.N. Bhagwati, Supp, Raj, Kottayam, Maneka Gandhi's, Rajagopala Iyengar, Leq, Articles 41 to, Chandra Mohan's, Mohinder Singh Chawala, Ram Lubhaya Bagga's

WORK_OF_ART: LLJ 766 Mad, The Superintendent of Police

NORP: Punjab, Punjab, mans, Rosecrans, Indian, Punjab

LOC: Paragraph 25