Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Kusum Lata and Others Vs. Satbir and Others
Decided On : Mar-02-2011
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Article 142
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2, 3., 4., three, two, 5., 14.6.2006, three, three, 6, one, one, one, one, 8, 9, 10., 13, 530, 11, 16, 29, 16, 17, 6, 139, 17, a little more than four, 12, three, three, 13, three, 3, 15, 16
ORG: the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, FIR, Ashok Kumar, Tribunal, the High Court, Ashok Kumar, Satbir, Shri Ram Avtar, Mahendergarh Hospital, Tribunal, the High Court, FIR, Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, FIR, Court, Court, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Tribunal, the Tribunal on the assessment, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Delhi Transport Corporation, Court, Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, National Insurance Company Limited, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Court, Tribunal, Nationalised Bank
DATE: 12th January, 2005, HR-34-8010, HR-34-8010, HR-34-8010, the next day, HR-34-8010, 2009, 2009, 2004, 14, a period of, six weeks
PERSON: Surender Kumar, Kusum Lata, Ashok Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Surender, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Bimla Devi, Sarla Verma, Bench, Swaran Singh
ORDINAL: first, second, third, first, first
FAC: Mahendergarh Hospital
PRODUCT: Mahendergarh, no.1, no.1, no.1
GPE: Surender
PERCENT: 7%