Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kusum Lata and Others Vs. Satbir and Others

Decided On : Mar-02-2011

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Article 142

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 2, 3., 4., three, two, 5., 14.6.2006, three, three, 6, one, one, one, one, 8, 9, 10., 13, 530, 11, 16, 29, 16, 17, 6, 139, 17, a little more than four, 12, three, three, 13, three, 3, 15, 16

ORG: the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the High Court, FIR, Ashok Kumar, Tribunal, the High Court, Ashok Kumar, Satbir, Shri Ram Avtar, Mahendergarh Hospital, Tribunal, the High Court, FIR, Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the High Court, FIR, Court, Court, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Tribunal, the Tribunal on the assessment, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Delhi Transport Corporation, Court, Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, National Insurance Company Limited, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Court, Tribunal, Nationalised Bank

DATE: 12th January, 2005, HR-34-8010, HR-34-8010, HR-34-8010, the next day, HR-34-8010, 2009, 2009, 2004, 14, a period of, six weeks

PERSON: Surender Kumar, Kusum Lata, Ashok Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Surender, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Dheeraj Kumar, Bimla Devi, Sarla Verma, Bench, Swaran Singh

ORDINAL: first, second, third, first, first

FAC: Mahendergarh Hospital

PRODUCT: Mahendergarh, no.1, no.1, no.1

GPE: Surender

PERCENT: 7%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //