Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sunita Gupta Vs. Inderjeet Singh and anr.

Decided On : Jan-31-2011

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 151 CPC, a "No Objection, the "No Objection, Order 23 Rule 3A, Section 21, the Indian Contract Act, Section 22, Section 19A, Section 20, Section 25, Section 27, Section 28, Section 29, Section 30

CARDINAL: 1, one, 5, 566, 657, 185, 1, 581.5, one, thereof.10

GPE: I.A., Kailash, New Delhi, no.3, India

PERSON: no.1 Shri Inderjit Singh, floor.2, no.1 Shri Inderjit, Singh, Sneh Lata Pahuja, Virender Pahuja, Devineni Tirupathirayudu v. Surapaneni Suramma, Devi Bhagat v. Rajinder Singh, Preetinder Singh, Singh 2010, Rajwanti, Kishan Chand Shehrawat, Chanchal Bansal, Himanshu Bansal, Banwari Lal v., Chando Devi, Singh, Babu Rao, Shri Inderjit, MCD

ORDINAL: second, third, second, second, second, third, third

DATE: two servant quarters, 30th March, 2009, 2006, 21st December, 2007, 1993, 22nd April, 2008, today, 1872

ORG: MCD, MCD, the Supreme Court, CPC, Court, Court, DLT, Court, CM, Reliance, the Supreme Court, Bholi, Court, Court, Union of India, Court, Court, MCD Bye Laws, this Court of the contract, Court, MCD, MCD

NORP: sanction.3, D.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //