Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

B.N.S.Reddy S/O Late B N Naja Reddy Vs. the Union of India and ors

Decided On : Nov-02-2010

Court : Karnataka

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Promotion Regulations, Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution and, Rule 9 and Regulation 9, Rule 9, the Land Acquisition Act, Regulations 5, Article 226 of the Constitution

ORG: ORDER1, Superintendent of Police (Vigilance, Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Ltd., the Central Administrative Tribunal Bangalore Bench, the Karnataka Police Service, KPS, the Indian Police Service, the Indian Police Service (Recruitment) Rules, Indian Police Service (Appointment, Promotion (Regulation, Karnataka Police Service, State Police Service Cache Officers, the Indian Police Service, Regulation, Selection Committee, IPS, IPS, IPS, theTribunal, Tribunal, IPS, the Karnataka State Police Service, KSPS, KSPS, Tribunal, l, Union of India, the State Government, Stale Police Officers, State Police Officers, the Union Public Service Commission, State Police Officers, Indian Police Service, the Union Public Service Commission, the Union of India, the State Police Service, the Indian Police Service, Tribunal, the Indian Public Service, Regulations, the Union Public Service Commission, the State Police Officers, the Indian Police Service, Regulations, Stale Police Officers, the State Police Service.6, the Karnataka State Police Service, Indian Police Service, the Honble Apex Court, Tribunal, the Government of India, IPS, Tribunal, State, KCS, Performance Reports) Rules, the State Government, the State Government, KAT, Lokayuktha, IGP, the State Government, State Police Service, IPS, Tribunal, Govt, Tribunal, IPS, IPS, the State Government, the Selection Committee, AGA, Nos.8, the Apex Court, the Union of India, Tribunal, the Apex Court, IPS, the Apex Court, IPS, IPS, the Union Public Service Commission, the Siate Police Service, the Central Government, the State Police Service, the State Police Service, State, Commission, the Central Government, the State Government, State, Sri Praveen Kumar Urva3, IPS, the State Government, the Indian Police Service, tfie Government of India, IPS, VV1P Security, Directorate of Civil Rights Enforcement, IPS, State, All India Service, IPS, Union of India, VsBombay Municipal Corporation, AIR 1986, SC, Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, Tliat, Govt, vs.- Union of India 8L, AIR 1970 SC, a Selection Board, a Selection Board, R.S.Das, Union of India 81 Others, AIR 1987 SC 593, the All India Services Act, Indian Administrative Services (Recruitment Rules, Indian Administrative Service, the State Civil Service, Committee, the State Government, the State Govt, All India Services, the Selection Committee, the State Govt, the State Govt, the Apex Court, State, U.P., Maharaja Dharmander, AIR 1989 SC 997, International Airport Authority of India 81 Others, AIR 1979 SC 1623, Govt, Project & Equipment Corporation of India Ltd., State of Punjab Si Another, Gurdial singh Si Others, Court, Singh Si Another, Union of India Si Others, ATJ, DPC, no.9, Union of India and Others, AIR 1997, Tribunal, Tribunal, State of HP and Others, Apex Court, Tribunal, State of Madya Pradesh, AIR 1993 SC 1221, the Apex Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Government, Tribunal, AIR 1990, SC, the Apex Court, Court, Selection, Selection Committee, Court, Smt, Union of India &, AIR 1996, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Bihar State Public Service Commission, another -vs.- Dr.Shiv Jatan Thakur, AIR 1994 SC 2466, the public service commission, member.h, the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal, Govt, Ramanand Prasad Singh, another -vs.- Union of India, All India Seniees, the Apex Court, Tribunal, R.S.Das, the Apex Court, All-India Service, the Union Public Service Commission, Commission, the State Government, IPS, KF, Tribunal, DPC, Court, Court, the Apex Court, the State Police Service, the State Govt, Regulation 5(4, the State Government, Respondents, the Apex Court, Bihar Public Service Cornmission, a Public Service Commission, the High Court, the Public Service Commission, All India Sendee, the All- India Service, Al! India Service, Confidential Reports, Court, the State Government, the Central Government, the Union Public Service Commission, IPS, accepted.43, Tribunal

PERSON: Bangalore, Nos, Codre Personnel, Nos, Karnataka Cadre, No.7 herein, Bangalore, No.7, Sri, ii.he, Sri B.K.Bhattacharya, No.7, Nos, Nos, Nos, Nos, Sri, Kalyan Basavaraj, Shela Krishna, AGA Smt, Sheela Krishna, Nos, Sri, later.22, Sri, M.R.Shailendra, Nos, Mate, Sri N.Somashekar2, Sri Syed Ulfath, Sri R.S.Harihar5, Sri B.Srikanlappa6, Sn K.Srinivasa7, Sri BA.Padmanayana8, Sri B.N.Srinivasa Reddy9, Sri, Nos, Bangalore, Rajendra Singh, cum merit, merit cum, Olga Tellis, wherein, Dayaram Shetty, Anil Katiyar, Durgdevi, Srikant Chaphekar, Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke -vs, B.S.Mahajan, Nutan Arvind, Appellant, Vijay Anandkar, Mir Ghulam Hussan, No.7, Very Good, Very Good, Good, No.7

CARDINAL: 13.9.2001, 1841/2000, No.9, 10 and 11, 10, 11, 4 to 8, 11, 1.12.2000, three, nine, three, 9 to 11, 6 and 8, 11, nine, three, 1/1/2000, No.8, 5(4, nine, three, 1/1/2000, nine, No.8, 9 and 10, 4, 5, No.8, 1.12.2000, 1, 8, 10, 9(1, 3, 1, 18/1/1997, 9, 1GP, No.5, 8, No.4, No.4, 7, three, nine, two, 9, No.7, two, two, one, No.4, No.9, three, two, No.7, five, only three, five, two, 11, No.7, 7, No.4, 9, No.9, No.9, 10 and J 1, No.9, 10, 9 to 10, 13, 9, 10.18, 10, 31.10.2001, 8 to 10, 9 and 10, three, two, 1, 2, 9, No.7, No.7, 10, 1, No.7, 11, 8 to 10, 6, 9, 9, 1, 5, 5, 3, 7, 4, 7, 21, nine, three, 1/1/2000, 4, 9, three, 5(4, 5(5, 1.12.2000, 9 to 11, 1.12.2000, 8, 6, three, 81, 180, 150, 3, 489, 3, 2, 3, 434, 10, 4, 23, 1, 9!i, 4, 135, 4, 33, No.9, 11, 9, No.9 to 11, 7, 11

GPE: O.A.No, brevity).2, Nos.9, the State of Karnataka, Nos.9, O.A., Karnataka, Nos.9, Karnataka Cadre, Karnataka, Karnataka, later.19, Karnataka, R.K.Masur, No.7, Bangalore City, IA, India, India, U.P.S., A.L.Kalra, India, Nos.9

DATE: 1954, 1955, 1984, the year 2000, 1841/2000, the year 2000, the year 2000, years, the last five years, 1954, December 2000, 1994, the year 1993-94, 18/10/1994, 7/4/1995, the year 1993-94, 10/5/1989, the year 1989, the previous five years, five years, the years 1994 - 95, 1998-99, the previous five years, the relevant years, five years, five years, years, 16 to 23 years, five years, about two years, four days, nearly eighteen months, 1993-94, 1/12/2000, Annual, five years, 1841/2001, 2003, the year 1955, 31.12.1997, sixty days, 2000, under Arl.2i, 1954, 1955, 1979, 1984, 1980, 2006, annual, 1997 4, annual, seven years, 1992, 20/1/1997, 1973, 1996, annually, annual, 7'1, the respective years

ORDINAL: first, second, first, third, third, first, third, second, fourth, first, second, fourth, second, third, 7th, 7th, 7th, 7th, second, first, third, second, second, second, first, first

NORP: Rules, Kadyan

PRODUCT: 31/10/2000, 31/10/2000, 31/10/2000, Rule 9, No.1 1, 31/3/1999, No.9, No.9, No.9, 31/10/2000, 31/10/2000, factors.f, 31/10/2000

FAC: Application, Respondent No.7

MONEY: 9.2001

WORK_OF_ART: Regulation, Officers, the Confidential Report

LOC: the Central Govt, Departmental

EVENT: SC 2656

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //