Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

English Vs. Arizona

Decided On : Jun-01-1909

Court : US Supreme Court

LAW: chapter 2, Act 92, Section 84, Section 96

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English

GPE: Arizona, U.S., Arizona, U.S., Arizona, U.S., Arizona, Pima County, Arizona, Arizona, the City of Tucson, Pima County, Albany County, Albany County, Minnesota, the City of Tucson, the City of, Tucson

CARDINAL: 214, 214, 180, 214, 206, one, 186, 11, 1, 2)(a, 3, 4, 206, 483, 488, 96, 471, three, three, 471, 467, 21, 186

DATE: 1909, 1909, April 26, 1909, June 1, 1909, 1897, the 21st of December of the year, 1903, 1903, 1903, sixty days, thirty days, a few days

ORG: U.S. Supreme Court, THE SUPREME COURT OF, Court, the supreme court, Arizona Board, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Territory, Stanley v. Supervisors, Court, the District Court of, Congress Street, the supreme court, the supreme court, Congress, The supreme court, Page 214 U. S. 361 , the supreme court, the supreme court, Arizona Board, The supreme court, the supreme court, Court, the supreme court, the supreme court, the supreme court, Page 214 U. S. 364 , the supreme court, the supreme Page 214 U. S. 365

PERSON: Fox v. Haarstick, Lander v. Mercantile National Bank, Wight v. Davidson, McKENNA, Territory, Bogan, Fox, Stanley, Stanley, appellee, Allen H. English, Lander v. Mercantile National Bank, Weyerhaueser, Wright, Davidson

PERCENT: 156 U. S. 674, 121 U. S. 535 , 156 U. S. 674, 121 U. S. 550

MONEY: 12,533.75

ORDINAL: first, second

NORP: §

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //