Gautam Kant Nimaan Vs. Gnct of Delhi and Others

Decided On : Oct-29-2010

Court : Delhi

LAW: Rule 22, Rule 21, Rule 22, The Constitution Bench, Rule 24, Rule 24, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, Rule 22, Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, Rule 6, the Constitution Bench, Rule 5, Rule 5, Rule 6, Rule 5

CARDINAL: 1, two, 9000 14,500, 20 to 23, 20, 2, 22, two, one, 17.06.2010, 26.05.2010, 23/24.05.2010.7, 23/24.05.2010, 23/24.05.2010, No.1, 2, No.2, 1, two, three, 7, 443, three, 15, two, seven, one, 5, 250, more than one, two, One, 1968]3SCR1, 465, three, two, three, 660, 5(e, 1968, 3, 5(e, 16.08.2010, 7, 161, 2, three, One, 24, three, 6(3, three, 3, 325, 3, 364, 9, 190, 7, 550, seven, 983, 3, 2, 2, 2, 2.6, 2.6, two, 1, 21, 528)"21, One, three, three, 29, one, 9, 319, 2, 9, 636

ORG: Judicial, the Delhi Judicial Service, the Delhi Judicial Service Rules, the Delhi Judicial Service, National Capital Territory, The Delhi Judicial Service, the Delhi Judicial Service Rules, the Delhi Judicial Service Rules, Metropolitan Magistrate, the District Court, the Bar Association, Court, Court, State, IPC, the Court of the petitioner, Court, Court, the Registrar General, Delhi High Court, the Rohini Bar Association, FIR No.787/96 under Section 506/34 IPC, State, FIR, The Bar Association, Bar Association, Bar Association, the High Court, Court, the Bar Association, FIR.8, the High Court, the Registrar General, Court, the Bar Association, the High Court, Delhi Judicial Service Rules, appointment.(2, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Uttar Pradesh & Ors, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, M.K. Agarwal, Gurgaon Gramin Bank, U.P. Coop, Sugar Factories Federation, Court, Court, Municipal Corporation, U.P., Municipal Corporation, Ashok Kumar Misra, State of Punjab, Dayaram, the Supreme Court, Karnataka State Road Tpt., Corporation & Anr, Court, Court, Court, Dayaram Dayal, Court, Dayaram Dayal's, SC, Dayaram Dayal's, the High Court, Judicial, the Supreme Court, AIR 1996, the Central Services Temporary (Service) Rules, Court, Court, the Delhi Police, Delhi Police Service, State of Punjab, Court, Education & Anr, the Supreme Court, High Court, Registrar, AIR 2001, the Apex Court, the Madhya Pradesh Judicial Service, Classification, Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, State of M.P. & Another, AIR 1997, Lordships, AIR 1974 SC 2192, Court, Lordships, the Punjab Civil Service, Lordships, G.S. Ramaswamy & Ors, Sub-Inspector of Police, the Hyderabad District Police Manual, Lordships, Satya Narayan Jhavar, Lordships, Lordships, Court, Lordships, Corporation, Lordships, Corporation, Board, Corporation, Corporation, State Bank of India, the Service Rules, Court, G.S. Ramaswamy, Hubli & Another v., AIR 2003 SC, the Apex Court, Satya Narayan Jhavar, The High Court, the High Court, the Delhi Judicial Services Rules, the Supreme Court, J. & K. & Anr, Writ Petition (Civil, Court, Judicial, the Higher Judicial Services, Judicial, High Court of Jammu & Kashmir, the High Court, inter alia, Judicial, Jammu & Kashmir High Court, VijayaBank, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Medical Sciences, Court, Court, Court, p.529)"29, Krishnadevaraya Education Trust, L.A. Balakrishna, State of Punjab, the State Government

DATE: 18th August, 2010, 1970, 23.01.2007, 02.04.2007, 1970, a period of, two years, two years, a period of, two years, two years, the period of three years, two years, three years, the very same day, Some weeks later, 14.05.2010, 26.05.2010, 24.06.2010, 26.05.2010, 26.07.2010, 17.09.2010, the expiry of two year/three years, two years, 1997, 1998, two years, 2000, Para 9, Para 10 and 11, 1974, 1966, five years, three years, a period of, two years, three years, a period of, two years, the period of three years, 14-9-1988, three years, 3 years, three years, 2010, 3234, 2001, 1955, four years, 1974, 1930, a period of, 18 months, a period of, two years, two years, the first six months, six months, one year, 10.1.1979, the first few years, 1991, 1995, 1996, 1997, 2004, 2002, 2001, para 5, 2010, 2002

FAC: Departmental, Wagon, Shakti Nagar Extension

GPE: Scale, Delhi, New Delhi, P.S., Delhi, Rules, Gujarat, Bench, Satya, Singh v. State of Punjab, Ramjibhai v. State of, Gujarat, reason.14, Delhi, Delhi, Clause, Singh v. State of Punjab(supra, reason.14, Pavanendra, stigmatic.22

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second, first

NORP: Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Punjab, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules

PERSON: Varun Pal and Others, Rohini, Rohini, Varun Pal and Others, Shakti Nagar Extension, Datar, reserved.10, P.P. Khurana, Gazette, Dayaram Dayal v. State of M.P., Wasim Beg v. State, Dharam Singh, Akhilesh C. Bhargav.16, Samsher Singh, Kumar Mishra, Narayan Athya, Akbar Ali Khan, Kedar Nath Bahi, Tarsem Lal Verma v. Union, Baldev Singh Khosla, S. Manjunath, Wasim Beg, Wasim Beg's, Dharam Singh, Dharam Singh's, Samsher Singh, Anr, Jai Kishan v. Commissioner of Police, Anr, Dharam Singh, Dharam Singh's, Veena Sharma, Bench, Others, Satya Narayan Jhavar, Lordships, Dharam Singh, Samsher Singh, Bench, Bench, Ali Khan, Singh, Wasim Beg, Khan, Bench, Samsher Singh, Raipur v. Ashok Kumar Misra, Jai Kishan v. Commissioner of Police, Baldev Singh Khosla, Kumar Mishra, Dharam Singh, Bench, Shamsher Singh, Sukhbans Singh, Akbar Ali Khan, Hegde, Rajesh Kohli v. High Court, Registrar, Narayan Verma v. Sanjay Gandhi PGI, Chaitanya Prakash, H. Omkarappa, Bhagwan Singh

TIME: 11.30 a.m. to 12.30 p.m., the night, the intervening night, 2.15 a.m., the intervening night, 9.1.1979 i.e., 21.09.2010

LOC: the District Judge, Additional District, an Additional District

QUANTITY: 3 SCC 321

EVENT: another Constitution Bench, SC 3269

PRODUCT: Rule 24

WORK_OF_ART: Jurisprudence