Promoters and Builders Association of Pune,and ors. Vs. the State of Maharashtra, and ors.

Decided On : Oct-08-2010

Court : Mumbai

LAW: the Societies Registration Act, Section 48, Section 44, the Revenue Code, Section 45, Section 247, the Revenue Code, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 48 of the Revenue Code, the MRTP Act, Section 44, Section 44, the Revenue Code, Section 48, the Revenue Code, the Indian Partnership Act, Section 48, the Revenue Code, Section 44, the Revenue Code, Section 48(7, the Revenue Code, the MRTP Act, Section 44, the Revenue Code, Section 48, Section 48, the Revenue Code, Section 44, the Revenue Code, the Mineral Laws, the Mineral Laws, Section 48, the Revenue Code, Section 48, the Land Acquisition Act, Chapter III, Section 48(1, Section 48, Section 48(3, the Mineral Laws, Section 44, the Revenue Code, Section 48, the Revenue Code, Section 3(e, Section 3, Section 48, the Revenue Code, the Mineral Laws, Section 48, Section 48, the Revenue Code, Section 48, Section 48, the Revenue Code, Section 48, Section 48, the Mineral Laws, the Revenue Code, the Mineral Laws, the Mines Act, Section 4, Section 3(e, Article 31A(1)(e, Constitution, Article 31A(1)(e, Section 3 Clause, Section 3, Section 3 (d, Article 31A(1)(e)."28 Section 48, Section 15 of the Act of, Section 22, Section 22, Chapter IV of the Rules, Rule 2, Rule 2, Chapter IV of these Rules, Chapter IV, Rule 29, Section 48(1, the Mineral Laws, Section 3, the Revenue Code, Section 48, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

CARDINAL: 1, four, 785, 7, 7, 110/, 1/, 17,441.29, 7, 23, 5, 11,600, 970, 16000, almost 14, 5, 14, 6, 7, 7, 8, 15, 1, 1, 2, 5, 4).(6, 4, three, less than, one thousand, one thousand, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, 20, one, 2, 13, 4, 3, 16, 24, 18, 7, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 7, 4, 2, 442, 385, 2, 810, 521, 22, 7, 23, 2, 2, 25, 3, 27, 964, 16 to 24, 2, 3(i, 9, 2, 2, 2, 1, 36, 2, one hundred, two, hundred fifty, 29, 100, up to 1000, 2, 1, 2, 1, 964, 13, 34, 791, 41, 38, three, 7, three, three, 7, three, three, 39

DATE: 2008, 1860, 1950, 1966, 1966, 2008, two weeks, seven days, 05 February, 2008, 09 January, 2008, 05 February, 2008, 2008, 1932, November, 2007, 2010, 1955, 27 May, 2009, 03 June, 2009, 13116, 14 July, 2009, the year 200708, 14 July, 2009, 29 July, 2009, 1957, 2005, 1894, 1978, 1976, 1957, 1957, 1957, 03 February, 2000, 1957, 67 of 1957, 1988, July 10, 1989, 3 February, 2000, 1957, 1972, 1997, 1955, 1965, 1882, 1952, Section 2(jj, 1952, 1957, 1957, 19, 31, 1948, 1957, 1949, 1957, 1957, 1968, 1968, 1955, 1949, 1)(iv, 1955, 2007(1, 2007, 09 November, 2009, 03 February, 2000, 1957, 21, 1963

ORG: the Promoters and Builders Association of Pune, Bombay Public Trust Act, Respondents, the Petitioner/ Association, the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, Steel, RCC, Petitioners, Petitioners, the Petitioner/ Association, the Civil Court, Civil Suits, The Petitioners/ Association, Court, Petitioners, Petitioners, the Planning Authority under Section 45, Writ Petition No.1408, the Local Town Planning Authority, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Authority, Petitioners, Petitioners, Court, Writ Petition No.1912, the Builders Association, the Planning Authority, the Respondent No.5, the Respondent No.5, Court, Authority, Court, Village Owale, Petitioners, Petitioners, Bombay Minor Minerals Extraction Rules, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, Court, Petitioners, the Planning Authority under Section 45, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Petitioners, Respondents, the State Government, the State Government, Respondents, Petitioners, the Planning Authority, Petitioners, Authority, Minor Minerals, Mines and Minerals (Regulations and Development) Act, Petitioners, Modern Builders v. The State of Maharashtra, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Civil Court, State Government, the Civil Court, the State Government, the State Government, Collector, State, The State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, State, the Planning Authority, Authority, the Planning Authority, Planning, Petitioners, the Municipal Authority, the Municipal Authority, the State Government, the Apex Court, Delhi Administration, The Apex Court, U.P., the Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, Shingle, the Government of India, Central Government, clause.(F. No, Petitioners, The Union of India, Writ Petition No.1447 of, Court, the Central Government, Petitioners, the State Government, Petitioners, Petitioners, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, SubSection, the State Government, Legislature, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Petitioners, the State Government, Court, Petitioners, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Grasim Industries Ltd, Siddeshwari Cotton Mills, Tillmanns & Company, Ichchapur Industrial Cooperative Society Ltd., State, SC, K.K.Kochuni AIR 1960, SC, Suffice, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, inter alia, Petitioners, the Apex Court, Gujarat Pottery Works, Controller of Mining, AIR 1967 SC, the Shorter Oxford Dictionary, Union, the State Government, the State Government, the Government of Maharashtra, Maharashtra Land Revenue (Extraction and Removal of, the State Government, Minor Minerals, Table, Table, the State Government, TABLEOfficer, Limit, Circle Inspector, The Bombay Minor Mineral Extraction Rules, Minerals Concession Rules, the Forest Department of the Government, the Public Works Department, the Collector of the District, the State Government, Government, The Apex Court, AIR 1967 SC, the State Government, the State Government, Petitioners, Ravi Industries, Western Coalfields Ltd, Petitioners, Court, Petitioners, Government, Court, Petitioners, Petitioners, Petitioners, the Apex Court, M/s. Som Datt Builders Ltd. v. Union of India, the Apex Court, Central Government, the Apex Court, Court, Reliance, State of Uttranchal, AIR 2007, Uttaranchal, Court, Court, Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, the State Government, the State Government, the Municipal Authority, the State Government, the State Government, Authority, Petitioners, Appellate, Petitioners, Court, Petitioners, the Appellate Authority

NORP: Mandamus, bund, English, Rules, Circle, Petitions

PERSON: Demand, Certiorari, Petitioner No.2, Petitioners, Nayab Tahasildar, Haveli Taluka, District Pune, Taluka, infringed.10, Dass Chadha, Dass, Gazette, limeshell kankar, Going, Nagpur Bench, Kishanlal Sancheti, Amar Chandra Chakraborty, Ali Gulshan, Hamdard Dawakhana Wakf AIR, Lila Vati Bai, Chandra Gupta AIR, B.P Sood, Articles 14, Mamlatdars, Mahalkaris, B.P Sood, Bhagwan Dass, Nagpur, Petitioner, Petitioners

ORDINAL: second, third, fourth, third, third, third, second, second, third, fourth, first, first, Firstly

GPE: Kothrud, C.R., nallas, nallas, India, nallas, Brothers, Bhagwan, Rajendra, nallas, nallas, Bombay, Jagdish, India, basis.33

LOC: Pune, the District of Pune, Respondent

PRODUCT: Respondent No.2, Chalcedony, S.P.GUPTA, subSection

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India, Mineral Regulation Laws, Boulder,, N O T, Mineral Laws, Acts and Rules, Acts and Rules

QUANTITY: 16 wp.785.08, 32 wp.785.08, 34 wp.785.08

EVENT: the 1949 Rules