Sandip Devidas Thorat, Age 31 Years, Vs. the Principal Secretary (Appeals and Hearing), Home Department, State of Maharashtra, He Subdivisional Officer, Sangamner,

Decided On : Aug-10-2010

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

LAW: Article 227 of the Constitution of India, Section 56(1, Section 60, C.R.No, Section 379, the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 15, Chapter 16, Indian Penal Code, Chapter 16, the Indian Penal Code, the Police Act, Chapter 16, the Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code, Nashik, Chapters 16, the Indian Penal Code, Chapter 16, the Indian Penal Code, Article 227 of the Constitution of India.20

CARDINAL: 1, 2. Rule, 4, No.2, 24.12.2009, three, 8).5, 14, 23.04.2010, about 25.05.2010, 6, two, No.2, 17, 24.12.2009, No.2, 2001(3, five, five, 2, No.2, No.2, 24.12.2009, No.2, two, three, three, No.2, three, 17, No.2, 16, No.2, 24.12.2009, No.2, 17, 24.12.2009, 379, two, two, two, three, three, two, 17, No.2

DATE: 23 April, 2010, 24th December, 2009, 15th April, 2009, the period of one year, 29.9.2009, 1951, the period of one year, 24.12.2009, 23 April, 2010, 24.12.2009, 23 April, 2010, 1986, 31.12.2009, 26.02.2010, 23 April, 2010, 23.4.2010, 1034, 24.12.2009, 23.04.2010, 31.12.2009, 26.2.2010, 23.4.2010, 24.12.2009, 31.12.2009, 26.02.2010, 23.4.2010, 23.4.2010, 24.12.2009, 24.12.2009, 23 April, 2010, 24th December, 2009, 23 April, 2010, 23 April, 2010, 24th December, 2009

ORG: Appeals & Hearing, Home Department, State, SubDivisional Magistrate, Sangamner Division, Sangamner, FACTUAL, the SubDivisional Police Officer, Aurangabad, Bombay Police Act, no.1, no.2, the Appellate Authority, no.2, no.1 Appellate Authority, no.2, Kopargaon Police Station, the Appellate Authority, Kopargaon Police Station, Nashik, Appellate Authority, the Division Bench, Court, Nasik Districts, The High Court, Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Court, Tribunal, the High Court, Authority, Court, APP, the Appellate Authority, the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sangamner, State, SubDivisional Magistrate, State Government, the Environment (Protection, Kopargaon Police Station, Dist, no.2, District of Nashik, no.2, Appellate Authority, A.P.P., no.2, Appeals & Hearing, Home Department, State, SubDivisional Magistrate, Sangamner Division, Sangamner

GPE: Mantralaya, Mumbai, Kopargaon, Dist, Kopargaon, Ahmednagar, Ahmednagar, Kopargaon, District Ahmednagar, the District of Nasik, L.J., the Thane Commissionerate, CR, CR, Godavari, Godavari, jurisdiction.15, C.R., C.R., C.R., Godavari, Godavari, Godavari, Ahmednagar, Mantralaya, Mumbai

NORP: Dist, C.R.No, Dist

PERSON: Kopargaon, Exh, Exh, Taluka, L.J. 926, Buldana, 23.4.2010, CONSIDERATION, 23.4.2010, 23.4.2010, Rulings

FAC: Camp Shirdi

PRODUCT: Nashik, Districts, no.1, No.1, No.1, Ahmednagar, No.1, Rulings, No.1, Ahmednagar, no.1, no.1

LOC: Ahmednagar District, District Ahmednagar

WORK_OF_ART: Umar Mohamed Malbari Vs K.P. Gaikwad Dy, the Taluka of Bhiwandi, Punjaji Dagdu Gaikwad V/s State of Maharashtra, 24.12.2009, Nashik and Aurangabad, Nashik and Aurangabad, Nashik and Aurangabad

QUANTITY: more than 100 miles