Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Guru Nanak Rice Mills, Arnia and ors. Vs. Punjab National Bank and ors.
Decided On : Sep-06-2000
Court : Jammu and Kashmir
LAW: Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 8, Rule 5, Order 8, Rule 5, under:-- 1, Order 8, Rules 4, the Usurious Loans Act, Section 21A, the Banking Regulation Act, the Banking Regulation Act, Section 21A, the Banking Regulation Act, Article 141 of the Constitution
NORP: Sharma, J.1
DATE: 28-11-1991, quarterly, 1985, para-10, para-10, 1981, 1985, 72.755.00. 5, 1047, 1050, 1992, 1994, 1994, 2721, 1985, 1983, quarterly, 1996, 1986, 1994, 1994, 2721
ORG: the District Judge, Bank, Arnia, the Punjab National Bank, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, B.C. Letter, B. C. Letters, Court, CPC, AIR 1999, the High Court, Union Bank of India, Dalpat Gaurishanker Upadyay, AIR, Corporation Bank, AIR SCW, AIR, Courts, Legislature, the Reserve Bank of India, the High Court, Bank, the Reserve Bank, Court, the Reserve Bank, Court, Court, the Reserve Bank, Courts, the Reserve Bank, Court, Section 21A. Banks, the Reserve Bank, Bank of Baroda v. Jagannath Pigment & Chem, First Appeal No, Court, The High Court, High Court, Court, Corporation Bank, AIR SCW, the High Court
GPE: Jammu, p.a., C.P.C., Bombay, Bombay
PERSON: Rice Mill, Raghu Mehta, Chopra, Sardari Lal, Nos, --'5, Mehta, Balkari Lal, B. C. Letter, B. C. Letter, B. C. Letter, B. C. Letter, Nos, Sardari Lal, Sampuran Singh, Naranjan Singh, Mehta, D.S. Gowda, Krishna Reddy, Canara Bank, D. S. Gowda
CARDINAL: 2 to 8, 2 to 8, 21-8-1980, 2,26,922.97, 2, 10, 3, 3, two, 4, 5, 19, 4, 11, 3-12-1987, 2 to 8, 5(1, 1, only two, 11-11-1986, 3-12-1987, 3, 4, 30-6-1980, 2, 5, 31-12-1980, 3, 19-8-1982, 98,457.96., 2, 11-11-86, 1,25,825.50, 30-6-1986, 6, 3-12-1987, 1,20,952.50, 31-12-1987, 6, 2, 3, 2, 6, 18, 1, 5, 213, 228, 231, 8, 5, 280, 1,66,759.29, 13 1/2, 1,66,759.29, 364, one, 1,20,675.59, 1,66,759.29, 3
PERCENT: 12%
PRODUCT: Para 10
EVENT: Bombay 482
WORK_OF_ART: the Banking Laws (Amendment) Act